CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7781989; ADJ8262771
Regular
Oct 03, 2013

MIRIAN GARCIA vs. COOPER COLD FOODS, INC., ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY as administrator for STAR INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is granting reconsideration of its own prior decision and rescinding a July 23, 2013 decision that had overturned a prior finding of 2% permanent disability for applicant's right knee injury. The WCAB determined that its August 9, 2012 order granting reconsideration was improvidently granted because the applicant had already filed a successive and improper petition for reconsideration. Consequently, the prior order and the subsequent rescinded decision are vacated, and the applicant's petition for reconsideration is dismissed.

WCABReconsiderationPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgePermanent DisabilityIndustrial InjurySuccessive PetitionImprovidently GrantedVacated
References
4
Case No. Docket No. 10
Regular Panel Decision

Zhong v. August August Corp.

Plaintiff Jian Zhong filed a class action against defendant August August Corp. alleging denial of overtime compensation and minimum wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Minimum Wage Act (NYMWA). Defendant August filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The court granted the motion in part, dismissing the FLSA overtime claims and related state law claims, but denied it in part, allowing the FLSA minimum wage claims and related state law claims to proceed. Plaintiff Zhong was granted leave to amend the complaint to address the deficiencies in the dismissed claims.

FLSANYMWAWage and Hour DisputeOvertime CompensationMinimum Wage ViolationMotion to DismissRule 12(b)(6) MotionLeave to AmendClass Action PotentialSupplemental Jurisdiction
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Leban Store Fixture Co. v. Properties

The plaintiff, a secured creditor, sold equipment to Picnic Parlor of Westbury, Inc. via a conditional sales agreement. Picnic Parlor defaulted and abandoned the premises owned by August Properties, Inc. August Properties subsequently refused the plaintiff access to remove the collateral unless demands for rent arrears, insurance, and a cash bond were met. The plaintiff complied with the bond and proof of ownership requests but refused rent and insurance, arguing it was not the tenant. The plaintiff then initiated a conversion action against August Properties. The trial court found August Properties liable for unreasonably interfering with the plaintiff's immediate right to possession of the collateral. The appellate court affirmed this decision, citing UCC 9-503 and 9-313 (8), stating that a landlord cannot refuse a secured party permission to remove collateral if statutory requirements are met, beyond requesting proof of ownership and a removal bond.

Conversion of personal propertySecured creditor rightsUCC Article 9Landlord-tenant disputeDefault on security agreementRight to possession of collateralUnreasonable interferenceAuctioneer's saleConditional sales agreementReal estate owner obligations
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

District Council No. 9 v. APC Painting, Inc.

Plaintiff District Council No. 9 (the Union) initiated this action under the Labor Management Relations Act to enforce several arbitration awards against APC Painting, Inc., its related APC and Apollo entities, and individual Gregory Fucci. The Union sought to confirm awards from the Joint Trade Committee (JTC) regarding violations of a collective bargaining agreement, including underpayment of wages and employment of non-union workers. Defendants moved to dismiss claims against Fucci and the Apollo entities, arguing non-participation in arbitration and denial of alter ego liability. Magistrate Judge Gorenstein denied the defendants' motion, allowing the alter ego theory to be pursued, and granted the Union's motion for partial summary judgment. The court confirmed the arbitration awards against the APC entities, affirming the limited judicial review of such awards and rejecting defendants' objections.

Labor LawArbitration AwardCollective Bargaining AgreementLMRA Section 301Alter Ego DoctrineCorporate Veil PiercingSummary JudgmentMotion to DismissWage ViolationsFringe Benefits
References
85
Case No. 2016-334 S C
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 27, 2017

2 & 9 Acupuncture, P.C. v. 21st Century Advantage Ins. Co.

This case concerns an appeal by 2 & 9 Acupuncture, P.C. from an amended order that granted summary judgment to 21st Century Advantage Insurance Company, dismissing a complaint to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. The defendant argued it had paid the plaintiff in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule. The Appellate Term, Second Department, reversed the lower court's decision, finding that the defendant failed to prima facie demonstrate proper denial of payment for services billed under CPT codes 97026 and 97016. Consequently, the defendant's motion for summary judgment regarding these specific CPT codes was denied.

No-Fault BenefitsSummary JudgmentCPT CodesWorkers' CompensationAppellate ReviewInsurance LawMedical BillingAcupunctureSuffolk CountyPayment Dispute
References
3
Case No. 2023 NY Slip Op 06370 [222 AD3d 756]
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 13, 2023

Matter of William O. (Duff)

August O., Jr., as guardian of William O. and administrator of his estate, moved to settle his final account, which included confirming a referee's report. The report concerned claims against and by Claudette Duff, William O.'s geriatric care manager. The Supreme Court, Richmond County, confirmed the referee's findings that Duff improperly collected $9,750 in rent and denied her claim for alleged unpaid expenses. Duff appealed this order. The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the Supreme Court's order, concluding that the court providently exercised its discretion in directing Duff to reimburse the estate and denying her claim.

GuardianshipMental Hygiene LawFiduciary DutyRent CollectionEstate AdministrationAppellate ReviewFinal AccountReferee's ReportUnpaid ExpensesGeriatric Care Manager
References
2
Case No. ADJ7709362
Regular
Dec 05, 2011

Gloria Kudelko vs. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves a defendant's petition for removal and reassignment of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board matter. The defendant sought removal of an order from August 9, 2011, which scheduled trial, ordered a claims adjuster to appear, and ordered her to show cause for failing to appear at a prior conference. The Board granted the petition, rescinded the August 9, 2011 order, and returned the case for reassignment to a different WCJ for trial. The Board also stated the current WCJ should proceed with the sanctions issue, allowing the adjuster an opportunity to show good cause for her non-appearance.

Petition for RemovalWCJ SanctionClaims Adjuster AppearanceReassignment WCJMandatory Settlement ConferenceShow Cause OrderIndustrial InjuryWCAB Rule 10453Interlocutory OrderPetition for Reassignment
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Monteiro v. Rasraj Foods & Catering, Inc.

The plaintiff appealed two orders from the Supreme Court, Queens County. The first order, dated August 24, 2009, referred specific issues concerning the plaintiff's personal injury claim to the Workers' Compensation Board. The second order, dated February 9, 2010, denied the plaintiff's motion for reargument. The appellate court dismissed the appeal from the February 9, 2010 order, citing that orders denying reargument are not appealable. Regarding the August 24, 2009 order, the court affirmed the referral of employer-employee relationship and course of employment issues to the Workers' Compensation Board due to its primary jurisdiction. However, it modified the order by retaining jurisdiction over the issue of whether the defendant provided appropriate workers’ compensation insurance coverage, deeming it a question of law for the court.

Personal InjuryWorkers' Compensation BoardPrimary JurisdictionEmployer-Employee RelationshipCourse of EmploymentWorkers' Compensation Insurance CoverageAppellate ReviewMotion to ReferReargumentSupreme Court (New York)
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Kenneth V.

This is an appeal from a Family Court order that found respondent August V., Ill neglected his children. The proceeding was initiated by the petitioner, alleging neglect due to the parents' refusal to accept intensive counseling for two children exhibiting aggressive behavior, including wielding a knife. The Family Court initially found the father neglected all seven children. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, finding no evidence of parental misconduct by the father. The court determined that treatment recommendations were not directly communicated to the father, and he was unaware of the escalated fighting. Consequently, the petition against August V., Ill was dismissed due to insufficient proof of neglect.

NeglectChild protectionParental misconductFamily lawChild welfareAbuseErie CountyAppellate reviewParental responsibilityMental health services
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Dimitropoulos v. Painters Union District Council 9

The plaintiff, Peter Dimitropoulos, sued District Council 9 of the International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades ("DC-9") for age discrimination under the ADEA. He alleged the union improperly handled his grievance, failed to refer him to jobs, and wrongfully expelled him. The court found no evidence that the union's handling of his grievance or his expulsion after a fight were motivated by age. Crucially, regarding job referrals, the plaintiff admitted he failed to sign the required "out-of-work book," providing a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for not receiving referrals. As the plaintiff failed to present a genuine issue of material fact showing intentional age discrimination, the court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, thereby dismissing the ADEA claim.

Age DiscriminationEmployment LawLabor Union LiabilitySummary Judgment MotionFederal Court CaseADEA ClaimJob Referral DiscriminationUnion Grievance ProcessMember ExpulsionDisparate Treatment
References
13
Showing 1-10 of 1,233 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational