CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ11164231
Regular
Nov 06, 2013

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, (Deceased) vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case involves a petition for exhumation and autopsy filed by the dependents of a deceased sheriff to determine the industrial cause of death. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition because the applicants failed to provide any expert medical opinion supporting the necessity of an autopsy, despite multiple continuances in the case for discovery. The Board cited case law emphasizing that exhumation is a sensitive matter requiring substantial justification and expert support to demonstrate its probable value in providing significant information. While the petition is denied, it can be refiled with appropriate supporting evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Exhumation and AutopsyIndustrial InjuryCardiac ArrestArising Out Of Employment (AOE)Occurring In The Course Of Employment (COE)Declaration of Readiness to Proceed (DOR)Labor Code Section 5706Labor Code Section 5707Expert Opinion
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cheeks v. City of New York

Plaintiff Tatiana Cheeks sued the City of New York for false arrest and malicious prosecution after she was arrested for the death of her infant daughter, Cha-Nell, who died of malnutrition in 1998. Detective Donald Faust arrested Cheeks based on a medical examiner's autopsy report concluding malnutrition without an internal medical explanation, inferring parental neglect. Cheeks contended she diligently fed her daughter, and her expert proposed a 'failure to thrive' syndrome. A jury initially found no probable cause for the arrest, but the appellate court found that probable cause existed as a matter of law based on the autopsy report and Cheeks's sole caregiver status. Ultimately, the court reversed the jury's judgment for the plaintiff and remanded for a new trial due to the trial court's error in excluding part of the autopsy report (stating 'homicide (parental neglect)') after the plaintiff's counsel 'opened the door' to questioning about medical defects. The dissenting justices argued the issue of probable cause was for the jury and that the exclusion of the 'parental neglect' statement was proper.

False ArrestMalicious ProsecutionProbable CauseMalnutrition DeathParental NeglectAutopsy ReportMedical Examiner FindingsExpert Witness TestimonyFailure to Thrive SyndromeAppellate Review
References
49
Case No. ADJ771417 (SDO 0240813)
Regular
Oct 06, 2008

ARTHUR ECKERT, Deceased, RAQUEL ECKERT vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAIN PREP, legally uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, adjusting agent

This case involves a deceased worker, Arthur Eckert, and his widow's petition for workers' compensation benefits. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was filed over eight years late. Even if timely, the petition would have been denied as medical evidence, including the autopsy, concluded Mr. Eckert died from pre-existing heart valve disease, with no evidence of an industrial cause.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingDismissalFindings Award and OrderDeceased HusbandArising Out of EmploymentHead InjuryFatal Heart AttackValvular Heart Disease
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 25, 1981

Claim of Anderson v. William Youngblood Associates

The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed a decision holding that the death of John Anderson resulted from an accidental injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment. The board found that Anderson was attending a town meeting on behalf of his employer, William Youngblood, and was reimbursed for travel expenses. His stop at a restaurant after the meeting to discuss it was not considered a deviation from employment. Additionally, the court found no reversible error in excluding the results of a blood alcohol test from an autopsy report.

Workers' Compensation BoardAccidental InjuryCourse of EmploymentEmployer LiabilityTravel ReimbursementMeeting AttendanceBlood Alcohol Test ExclusionAutopsy ReportEvidentiary RulingSubstantial Evidence
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 07, 1985

Claim of Burt v. County of Chemung

The claimant's decedent, a heavy equipment operator for Chemung County Highway Department, was found dead on July 7, 1980, while operating a roller. An autopsy revealed severe coronary artery disease, and medical evidence indicated a myocardial infarction occurred at least six hours before his death. The medical findings concluded that the decedent's work effort was unrelated to his death. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Board's determination, which is founded upon substantial evidence, was affirmed.

Workers' CompensationMyocardial InfarctionCoronary Artery DiseaseDeath BenefitsWork-Related InjuryMedical EvidenceAppellate ReviewSubstantial EvidenceDecedentEmployer Liability
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 04, 2006

Claim of Johnson v. County of Clinton

Claimant filed for workers' compensation death benefits after her husband died at work. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge denied the claim, finding that the presumption of compensability had been rebutted. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the denial of benefits, ruling that the decedent’s death was not causally related to his employment. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, noting that the presumption of compensability was inapplicable as the death was witnessed and explained by autopsy, and deferred to the Board's resolution of conflicting medical expert opinions.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsCausationPresumption of CompensabilityMedical Expert TestimonyAppellate ReviewBoard DecisionAutopsyConflicting Opinions
References
2
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 00977 [180 AD3d 466]
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 11, 2020

People v. Cueva

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the judgment convicting defendant Wilmer Cueva of criminally negligent homicide and reckless endangerment. Cueva, a construction foreman, was found to have personally ordered unsafe actions resulting in a fatal trench collapse. The court rejected the defendant's unpreserved legal insufficiency claim and found the verdict supported by overwhelming evidence. Furthermore, the court found no error in the jury instructions, the admission of gruesome autopsy photos, or the denial of defendant's motion to suppress his statements.

criminally negligent homicidereckless endangermenttrench collapse fatalityconstruction safety violationsforeman liabilityappellate affirmationsufficiency of evidencejury instruction reviewautopsy photo admissibilitysuppression motion
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Nothaft v. Hawkeye Construction, Inc.

In March 2005, a truck driver died at a construction site due to hypertensive and arteriosclerotic heart disease. His spouse, the claimant, sought workers’ compensation death benefits. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and subsequently the Workers’ Compensation Board determined that the death was not causally related to his employment. The claimant appealed this decision. The court affirmed the Board's decision, citing substantial evidence from the autopsy report and a medical expert indicating no work-related connection, despite the presumption of compensability for an unwitnessed accident.

workers compensationdeath benefitscausal relationshiphypertensive heart diseasearteriosclerotic heart diseaseunwitnessed accidentpresumption of compensabilitymedical expert testimonysubstantial evidenceappellate review
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Hanna v. Able Body Labor

This case involves an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision which ruled against the causal relationship between a decedent's death and his employment. The decedent died from cardiac arrhythmia, and despite an initial finding by a WCLJ applying a presumption of compensability, the Board reversed this, stating the autopsy and death certificate provided substantial evidence to rebut the presumption. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, noting the lack of contradicting medical evidence from the claimant. The court also denied the claimant's request for further proof, citing her failure to raise the issue before the Board.

Workers CompensationDeath BenefitsCausal RelationshipUnwitnessed DeathPresumption of CompensabilityCardiac ArrhythmiaAtherosclerotic Coronary Artery DiseaseMedical EvidenceAppellate ReviewRebuttal of Presumption
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Barrett v. Transport System of Western New York, Inc.

Decedent, a 58-year-old long-distance truck driver, was found dead in his truck in Pennsylvania. An autopsy and toxicological analysis yielded no clear cause of death. His widow filed a claim for death benefits, which the employer's carrier controverted, arguing no causal relationship to employment based on a medical consultant's report. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed compensability, citing the presumption that unwitnessed deaths occurring in the course of employment arise out of employment, which the carrier failed to rebut with substantial evidence. The employer and carrier appealed this decision, but the court affirmed the Board's determination.

Workers' CompensationUnwitnessed DeathPresumption of Arising Out of EmploymentCausal RelationshipMedical EvidenceSudden Death SyndromeRebuttal of PresumptionLong-Distance Truck DriverDeath BenefitsAppellate Review
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 30 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational