CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ4436706 (SAC 0168766)
Regular
Jun 04, 2015

BARBARA NEWHOUSE vs. E GONZALEZ MD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Here's a summary for a lawyer: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued an order dismissing a Petition for Reconsideration filed by petitioner Barbara Newhouse. This dismissal is a direct result of the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of the petition. The original decision that was subject to reconsideration was issued on February 26, 2015. The Board acted upon the withdrawal to formally close this matter.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissedWithdrawnBarbara NewhouseEgonzalez MDState Compensation Insurance FundWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJ4436706SAC 0168766
References
0
Case No. ADJ7948651
Regular
May 09, 2016

Barbara Tom vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, JT2 INTEGRATED

This case involves a petition for reconsideration by the defendant, City of Oakland, following an award of permanent disability to applicant Barbara Tom. The defendant argued the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) erred by not deferring to the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) opinion and by not developing the record with the AME. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which found the AME's opinion deficient. The WCJ's report detailed how the primary treating physician's report was more persuasive and thoroughly reasoned, supporting the WCJ's findings over the AME's.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAgreed Medical Evaluator (AME)Primary Treating Physician (PTP)AMA GuidesPermanent Disability RatingCarpal Tunnel SyndromeSubstantial EvidenceWCJ OpinionMedical Opinion Deference
References
2
Case No. 534851
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 01, 2023

In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara Saporito

Claimant Barbara Saporito appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision that she voluntarily withdrew from the labor market. Saporito, a court reporter, sustained a work-related back injury in 2004 but was terminated from her job in 2006. She subsequently worked sporadically as a freelance reporter before ceasing employment, seeking additional disability awards for lost time. Although a WCLJ initially awarded benefits, the Board reversed, finding her separation and continued unemployment were not causally related to her disability. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, citing inconsistencies in Saporito's testimony, her acknowledged lack of medical evidence for significant periods, and the absence of documentary support for her termination as reasons for upholding the Board's finding of voluntary withdrawal.

Voluntary WithdrawalLabor MarketDisability BenefitsCausationSubstantial EvidenceCredibility DeterminationMedical Evidence GapsEmployment TerminationAppellate ReviewCourt Reporter
References
12
Case No. ADJ4295446 (GOL 0087464)
Regular
Mar 20, 2014

Virginia Landaw vs. Toyota of Santa Barbara, Public Service Mutual Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's petition for removal, which sought to have hearings held at the Santa Barbara district office rather than Oxnard. The WCAB found that the relocation was necessary due to insufficient space at the Santa Barbara facility, impacting lobby, hearing room, and parking availability. The Board reaffirmed its authority to calendar hearings at different offices based on available resources and cited the applicant's minimal increased travel as insufficient grounds for removal. The WCAB also highlighted the availability of CourtCall and the ongoing efforts to secure a more suitable Santa Barbara location.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDivision of Workers' CompensationDistrict OfficeVenueCourtCallMandatory Settlement ConferenceExpedited HearingJudicial NoticeAdministrative Law Judge
References
12
Case No. ADJ1674856
Regular
Dec 29, 2010

BARBARA SOREM-HUGHLETT, BARBARA HUGHLETT vs. VENTURA COUNTY, CHARTIS COSTA MESA

This case involves multiple workers' compensation claims filed by Barbara Sorem-Hughlett against Ventura County and Chartis Costa Mesa. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has issued an Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration in these consolidated cases. Therefore, all future communications, objections, and motions related to these claims must be directed to the WCAB's San Francisco office, not any local office, pending a Decision After Reconsideration. The order was filed on December 29, 2010.

Sorem-HughlettVentura CountyChartis Costa MesaPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersRonnie G. CaplaneJames C. CuneoAlfonso J. Moresi
References
0
Case No. ADJ1153404
Regular
Jan 03, 2014

BARBARA DIEFENBACH, (BARBARA CLARK) vs. SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by Barbara Diefenbach (Applicant) against San Joaquin Community Hospital. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition on its merits, adopting the reasoning of the administrative law judge. Furthermore, the petition was subject to dismissal for failure to serve all adverse parties. The Board also admonished the petitioner for procedural violations, including attaching an unauthorized medical report and filing a supplemental petition improperly.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationDENIEDLabor Code section 5905WCAB Rule 10842WCAB Rule 10848sanctionsLab. Code§ 5813administrative law judge
References
3
Case No. ADJ1259001
Regular
Apr 08, 2014

Patricia Scharli vs. County of Santa Barbara, Corvel Corporation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Patricia Scharli's Petition for Removal. The denial was based on the administrative law judge's report, which concluded that moving a mandatory settlement conference from Santa Barbara to Oxnard due to space limitations at the new Santa Barbara office was a mere inconvenience, not significant prejudice. The WCAB has statutory authority to determine hearing locations based on budgetary and space constraints, and can calendar hearings at different offices even without formally changing venue. The WCAB encourages the use of CourtCall for attorneys to mitigate travel difficulties for applicants.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDivision of Workers' CompensationDistrict OfficeVenueCalendaring AuthorityMedical Treatment Lien ConferenceCourtCallMandatory Settlement ConferenceExpedited Hearings
References
1
Case No. ADJ1153404 (BAK 0112784)
Regular
May 28, 2009

Barbara Clark vs. SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM

This case involves an applicant, Barbara Clark, whose petition for writ of review was denied by the Court of Appeal. The Court found her petition frivolous and intended to harass the defendant, San Joaquin Community Hospital (represented by Adventist Health System). Consequently, the Court remanded the matter to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award attorney fees and costs against Clark. The WCAB, finding the requested fees and costs reasonable, awarded Adventist Health and its attorney $5,266.47 against Barbara Clark.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemittiturPetition for Writ of ReviewFrivolous PetitionSanctionsAttorney FeesCostsUnreasonable DelayMeritless PetitionLabor Code Section 5801
References
1
Case No. ADJ9198656; ADJ9192994
Regular
Jul 07, 2025

JEANETTE LIRA vs. COTTAGE HEALTH SYSTEM, PSI, SANSUM SANTA BARBARA MEDICAL, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendants Cottage Health System and Zurich American Insurance Company sought reconsideration of a Joint Findings and Award. Cottage Health contended it was incorrectly identified as the liable employer instead of Sansum Santa Barbara Medical, insured by Zurich. Zurich argued there were multiple injuries or that compensation was barred by the statute of limitations. The Appeals Board denied Zurich's petition, granted Cottage Health's petition, and amended the award to reflect Sansum Santa Barbara Medical, insured by Zurich American Insurance Company, as the liable party.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJeanette LiraCottage Health SystemGallagher BassettZurich American Insurance CompanySansum Santa Barbara MedicalAdjudication NumbersJoint Findings and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationComplex Regional Pain Syndrome
References
6
Case No. 09-CV-8140 (KMK)
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 31, 2011

In Re Dayton

Plaintiffs Michael Dayton and Barbara Nieves, individually and as guardian for their five infant children, brought action against the City of Middletown, its police officers, Orange County, and the Department of Social Services Orange County (DSS) alleging federal and state law violations. The claims stemmed from a November 2008 incident involving an alleged attack by a felon and subsequent police actions, followed by Family Court proceedings where neglect findings were entered against the parents. The court granted DSS's motion to dismiss with prejudice, finding it not a suable entity. Motions to dismiss the federal § 1983 Monell claims against Middletown and Orange County were granted without prejudice due to insufficient pleading of a municipal policy. State law claims against Orange County were dismissed without prejudice due to untimely notice of claim for adult plaintiffs, with infant claims requiring state court application. Claims arising from the Family Court's neglect finding and protective order were dismissed with prejudice under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, but other allegations regarding Orange County's conduct during Family Court proceedings survived. The Middletown Officers' motion for summary judgment was denied without prejudice, citing insufficient factual inconsistencies for dismissal prior to discovery. Plaintiffs were given thirty days to file a Second Amended Complaint.

Civil Rights ViolationsFourth AmendmentEighth AmendmentFourteenth Amendment42 U.S.C. § 1983Motion to DismissSummary JudgmentRooker-Feldman doctrineMonell claimFailure to Train
References
98
Showing 1-10 of 225 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational