CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 07, 1979

Claim of Lennon v. Kaiser

The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed a referee’s decision, determining that on January 24, 1975, the claimant was an employee of partners Ralph Kaiser and William Benson, and sustained injuries during employment. Testimony revealed conflicts regarding the claimant’s employment status and duties. Kaiser stated he never met the claimant until the day of the incident and instructed him to stay on the ground, yet admitted to an oral partnership with Benson and sharing profits. The claimant, conversely, testified both partners gave him directions, with Kaiser telling him to push shingles, and Benson having previously paid him. Despite the conflicting accounts, the board's finding of employment and injury was affirmed due to substantial evidence in the record.

Workers' CompensationEmployment RelationshipPartnershipAccidentInjurySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewConflicting TestimonyRoofing BusinessEmployee Status
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 01, 2009

People v. Nunn

This case addresses whether a court's discretion to deem a misdemeanor complaint charging a drug offense as an information, without a field test or laboratory analysis, violates a defendant's due process rights. The court distinguishes People v Kalin and Matter of Jahron S., applying the three-factor test from Mathews v Eldridge. It concludes that the substantial private interest in physical liberty and the risk of erroneous deprivation necessitate a laboratory report or field test in most drug-related cases, imposing minimal burden on the prosecution. Specifically, for defendant Mr. Nunn, the misdemeanor complaint was deemed an information on June 1, 2009, after the certified laboratory analysis was filed.

Due ProcessCriminal ProcedureMisdemeanorControlled SubstanceDrug PossessionMisdemeanor InformationMisdemeanor ComplaintPrima Facie CaseLaboratory AnalysisField Test
References
21
Case No. ADJ800932 (OAK 0299866) ADJ2725270 (OAK 0299867) ADJ635812 (OAK 0299868) ADJ4541817 (OAK 0308810)
Regular
Feb 16, 2010

JOAN STEPP vs. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board found the prior decision to be insufficient regarding apportionment of disability among multiple injuries as required by *Benson*. Additionally, the Board questioned the vocational expert's analysis for a finding of total permanent disability, as it did not adequately address retraining feasibility per *LeBoeuf*. The matter is remanded for the Agreed Medical Evaluator to provide clarified apportionment opinions and for a new decision consistent with *Benson* and *LeBoeuf*.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuriesCumulative TraumaPermanent Total DisabilityApportionmentAgreed Medical EvaluatorBensonLeBoeufVocational Expert
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Benson v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems

Plaintiff Selina Benson filed a complaint against North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems and individual defendants, alleging discrimination based on race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, and marital status, along with retaliation and breach of implied contract, under Title VII, NYSHRL, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985, and 1986. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss various claims. The court dismissed most NYSHRL claims (except retaliatory discharge) due to the election of remedies doctrine, and similarly dismissed most §§ 1981, 1985, and 1986 claims against North Shore due to preclusion. Additionally, Title VII claims against individual defendants and those alleging sexual orientation discrimination were dismissed. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss claims as time-barred under the continuing violation doctrine and dismissed the implied breach of contract claim, while allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint to add a collective bargaining agreement claim.

Employment DiscriminationTitle VIINew York State Human Rights LawRetaliationHostile Work EnvironmentSexual Orientation DiscriminationDisability DiscriminationRace DiscriminationGender DiscriminationBreach of Contract
References
42
Case No. FRE 213077; FRE 213078 FRE 194033; FRE 194034 FRE 194035
Regular
Mar 11, 2008

ROSA NUNEZ vs. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a prior workers' compensation award for multiple injuries, including cumulative trauma and specific injuries. The Appeals Board rescinded the previous award, remanding the matter for further development of the record. The primary issue is the proper apportionment of permanent disability based on the causation standard established by SB 899 and the *Benson* decision, as prior medical reports lacked sufficient detail for this analysis.

ReconsiderationFindings of FactAward and OrdersStipulated AwardCumulative InjurySpecific InjuryPermanent DisabilityApportionmentFormula AFormula C
References
7
Case No. ADJ3566182 (SAL 0077480) ADJ2182459 (SAL 0064054) ADJ3789006 (SAL 0067540) ADJ3867926 (SAL 0067541) ADJ1537096 (SAL 0069548) ADJ3077033 (SAL 0090420) ADJ1445385 (SAL 0100034)
Regular
Nov 07, 2008

JOSE PADILLA vs. CAMPBELL'S FRESH, Permissibly SelfInsured and Adjusted By CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE COMPANY; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, rescinding it due to an unresolved issue regarding permanent and stationary dates for the applicant's injuries. The WCJ's reliance on the *Benson* decision for separate permanent disability awards was questioned given that *Benson* was under appellate review. The case is returned to the WCJ to clarify whether the permanent and stationary dates for the various injuries are the same, and to await the appellate decision in *Benson* if they are.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and OrdersPermanent DisabilityReconsiderationCumulative TraumaAgreed Medical EvaluatorApportionmentBenson v. The Permanente Medical GroupWilkinson v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
References
10
Case No. ADJ2110739 (MON 0313927)
Regular
Oct 01, 2010

Rosalind Eskridge (Vallery) vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

This case returns to the trial level for a comprehensive re-analysis of applicant's permanent disability rating, specifically focusing on the Diminished Future Earning Capacity (DFEC) adjustment factor. The Board rescinded the prior award because the judge's decision did not fully adhere to the *Ogilvie* en banc decisions, which mandate a specific four-step analysis for rebutting the DFEC. The judge must now conduct a complete *Ogilvie* analysis, potentially developing the record further, to determine if the applicant's demonstrated earning loss and other relevant factors, including *Montana* factors, justify an individualized DFEC adjustment over the scheduled rating. The applicant bears the burden of proving that her evidence substantially overcomes the prima facie validity of the scheduled DFEC.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDiminished Future Earning CapacityDFECPermanent Disability Rating Schedule2005 PDRSOgilvie analysisAgreed Medical ExaminerDisability Evaluation UnitDEUAgreed Medical Examiner
References
6
Case No. SJO 0264010
Regular
Feb 11, 2008

CIPRIANO LOMOTAN vs. GE INFRASTUCTURE SECURITY, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

In *Lomotan v. GE Infrastructure Security*, the Appeals Board vacated a judge's notice of intention to impose sanctions and a related job analysis order. This decision followed a Commissioner's Conference where the parties reached a compromise and release resolving all issues, including vocational rehabilitation benefits. The Board found no basis for sanctions and determined the job analysis issue was moot due to the settlement.

RemovalAppeals BoardSupplemental OrderSanctionsWCJCommissioner's ConferenceCompromise and ReleaseVocational RehabilitationSupplemental Job Displacement BenefitsJob Analysis
References
0
Case No. ADJ3864552 (LAO 0788138)
Regular
Jan 03, 2011

ANTONIETA GUERRERO vs. WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORK, INC., ZURICH LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For FREMONT In Liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award due to insufficient analysis by the WCJ regarding the date(s) of cumulative trauma. The Board found the WCJ's decision lacked specific reference to evidence, particularly on whether multiple or a single period of cumulative trauma applied. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings, a new decision, and adequate analysis of all contentions, including permanent disability and apportionment.

Cumulative traumaOveruse syndromeFibromyalgiaPsyche injuryPermanent total disabilityApportionmentAttorney feesFindings and AwardReconsiderationWCJ
References
7
Case No. ADJ6502802
Regular
Feb 28, 2011

JOSE OLIVEIRA vs. RIVER FRONT APARTMENTS, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY, PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a maintenance worker's shoulder injury sustained on June 8, 2007. The workers' compensation judge awarded 39% permanent disability based on a qualified medical evaluator's analysis. The defendant argued this analysis, which applied the hernia chapter of the AMA Guides, was flawed and that impairment should be assessed using the upper extremity chapter. After reconsideration, the Appeals Board affirmed the original Findings and Award, adopting the judge's reasoning.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Reconsiderationindustrial injurymaintenance workerleft shoulderpermanent disabilitypanel qualified medical evaluatorAMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairmenthernia chapterWhole Person Impairment
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 329 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational