CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ669666 (MON 0318802)
Regular
Feb 22, 2011

JANE DOWDS vs. LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, permissibly self-insured; administered by TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a prior workers' compensation award. The applicant argued the administrative law judge erred in applying the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule and failing to award additional disability for irritable bowel syndrome. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's recommendation to defer the issue of permanent disability related to irritable bowel syndrome and attorney's fees, reserving jurisdiction at the trial level. The rest of the original award was affirmed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLong Beach Unified School DistrictTristar Risk ManagementFindings and AwardPermanent Disability Rating ScheduleIrritable Bowel SyndromeHypertensionReconsiderationDeferred IssueJurisdiction Reserved
References
Case No. VNO 0506664 VNO 0506924
Regular
Nov 06, 2007

MICHAEL SOUTH vs. CITY OF GROVER BEACH, CITY OF ATASCADERO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's petition regarding two industrial injuries: irritable bowel syndrome and bilateral upper extremity injuries. While the Board noted the petition was timely filed, it adopted the WCJ's report which found no permanent disability for the irritable bowel syndrome based on the treating doctor's opinion. The Board also upheld the use of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule for the upper extremity injury, as the applicant's medical reports predating January 1, 2005, did not establish permanent and stationary status or permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsideration DeniedIrritable Bowel SyndromeBilateral Medial EpicondylitisBilateral Cubital Tunnel SyndromePolice OfficerPermissibly Self-InsuredJoint PetitionTimely FiledPermanent Disability Rating Schedule
References
Case No. ADJ4585939 (VNO 0527178) ADJ2581067 (VNO 0527236)
Regular
Jan 02, 2014

KATHLEEN NUTT vs. TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, ALPHA FUND

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision granted reconsideration and affirmed a prior ruling, with a key amendment. The amendment expanded the applicant's entitlement to further medical treatment to cure and relieve the effects of her industrial psychiatric injury, hypertension, fibromyalgia, sleep disorder, and irritable bowel syndrome. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the administrative law judge's report into its decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJindustrial psychiatric injuryindustrial hypertensionfibromyalgiasleep disorderirritable bowel syndromefurther medical treatmentcure and relieve
References
Case No. ADJ7320474
Regular
Jun 08, 2015

XOCHILT GAMEZ vs. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a petition to reopen for new and further disability related to a psyche and irritable bowel syndrome injury. The defendant argued the applicant did not sustain new and further disability, but the WCAB granted reconsideration. The Board amended the original findings to clarify that all outstanding issues, including permanent disability, are deferred with jurisdiction reserved. The WCAB affirmed the substance of the WCJ's decision, granting the petition to reopen for new and further disability.

new and further disabilityPetition to ReopenLabor Code section 5410Labor Code section 5803psyche injuryirritable bowel syndromepermanent disabilitytemporary partial disabilitywage lossjurisdiction reserved
References
Case No. ADJ3588877 (SAC 0332526)
Regular
Jul 19, 2011

Laurie Shreffler vs. Electronic Data System, Hewlett Packard, Travelers Insurance Company

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision, the Appeals Board reversed the finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury related to diabetes. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which favored Dr. Nishimura's medical opinion over Dr. Nacouzi's regarding the diabetes. While the award for temporary and permanent disability remains, the applicant is no longer entitled to industrial medical treatment for her diabetes. The decision otherwise affirmed the original award for injuries to the neck, low back, psyche, and irritable bowel syndrome.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardElectronic Data SystemHewlett PackardTravelers Insurance Companyindustrial injurylow backneckpsycheirritable bowel syndromediabetes
References
Case No. ADJ7783776
Regular
Nov 02, 2016

MARY ATANDA vs. TACO BELL/YUM! BRANDS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision regarding applicant Mary Atanda's industrial injuries. The WCJ had awarded temporary disability, permanent disability, and further medical treatment for admitted lumbar spine, neck, and knee injuries. However, the WCJ did not adequately explain the reasoning for denying claims for psychiatric injury, arm injury, circulatory system issues, headaches, or irritable bowel syndrome. Therefore, the Board rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and a decision that sufficiently explains the grounds for determination.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardWCJAOE/COEorthopedic injurylumbar spineneckright shoulderright knee
References
Case No. ADJ10908468
Regular
Jun 30, 2025

DANIEL DORIS vs. DBI BEVERAGES, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Defendant filed a Petition for Reconsideration of a Findings and Award, challenging the deferral of issues regarding catastrophic injury and vocational expert fees. The Appeals Board, treating the petition under a removal standard despite a final order, agreed with the WCJ that the record was incomplete concerning applicant's work restrictions and vocational feasibility, thus requiring further development. Concluding that the defendant failed to establish substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if an adverse final decision ultimately issues, the Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardCervical spineLumbar spinePsychUpper extremitiesLower extremitiesBowelBladderApportionment
References
Case No. ADJ1588834
Regular
Mar 18, 2013

SOLEDAD YAP vs. MARINERS POST ACUTE NETWORK, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the judge's findings. The Board adopted the judge's report, which thoroughly addressed and refuted the defendant's arguments regarding temporary disability awards and the compensability of the applicant's urological condition. Defense counsel was admonished for mischaracterizing the record and citing evidence not in the record, with a warning of potential sanctions. The judge's findings, including the industrial causation of the applicant's cauda equina syndrome and associated permanent disability, were found to be supported by substantial evidence.

Petition for ReconsiderationAgreed Medical Examiner (AME)Qualified Medical Examiner (QME)Temporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityCompensable ConsequenceCauda Equina SyndromeUrological ConditionBowel DysfunctionBladder Dysfunction
References
Case No. ADJ1218003 (MF) (SBR0308128) ADJ2204113 (SBR0353225)
Regular
Aug 03, 2009

TIM PANDZIC vs. COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant appealed a decision finding no injury AOE/COE to his internal organs and disputing penalties for unreasonable delay and forcing trial. The Board rescinded the previous findings and returned the case to the trial level for further record development on the injury claims. The applicant also indicated willingness to withdraw penalty and sanction issues.

AOE/COEurological systembladder dysfunctionbowel dysfunctionLabor Code Section 5814unreasonable delaypermanent disability awardLabor Code Section 5813sanctionspetition for reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ4008604 (LBO 0390525) ADJ7754215
Regular
Dec 12, 2013

JOEL WILLIS vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM, Permissibly Self-Insured

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the City of Anaheim's petition for reconsideration. The Board upheld the administrative law judge's finding that a police officer sustained industrial injury to his psyche, hypertension, GERD, and IBS. Defendant argued the psychiatric injury stemmed from financial difficulties, not work stress, and that the Agreed Medical Evaluator's report was unsubstantiated. The Board found the AME's report constituted substantial evidence and was properly relied upon by the WCJ, despite the defendant's claims.

Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardindustrial injurypsycheinsomniahypertensiongastro-esophageal reflux diseaseirritable bowel syndromepolice officerreconsiderationAgreed Medical Evaluator
References
Showing 1-10 of 36 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational