CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ6951777
Regular
Nov 23, 2010

GINGER LOGAN-CANNON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board rescinded the original September 9, 2010 Findings and Award. A clerical error in a subsequent order setting aside the award, which mistakenly referred to other case numbers, was corrected to include the correct case number. The matter is remanded for further proceedings to address the November 29, 2010 hearing.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardClerical ErrorRescindedRemandWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJAdjusting AgencyLegally UninsuredCompanion Cases
References
3
Case No. ADJ1312021
Regular
Nov 01, 2013

GRICELDA AREVALOS vs. PERSONNEL PLUS, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order corrects clerical errors in a prior decision regarding Gricelda Arevalos's case. The errors involved an incorrect case number in the caption and an extra space within the case number later in the document. The Board is correcting these errors to reflect the accurate case number ADJ1312021 without further proceedings. This amendment ensures the official record is accurate.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDCLERICAL ERRORSORDER CORRECTINGPETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONCASE NUMBER CORRECTIONADJ7430358ADJ0302021ADJ1312021SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGSCONTINGENT PROCEEDINGS
References
0
Case No. 08-cv-6567L
Regular Panel Decision

Davis v. NYS Department of Corrections Attica Correctional Facility

Plaintiff Stefanie A. Davis, a former employee of the New York State Department of Corrections at Attica Correctional Facility, filed a lawsuit alleging race and gender discrimination and unlawful retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State Human Rights Law. She claimed her supervisor assigned her a disproportionate number of minority inmates, and she faced retaliation after complaining. Defendant's initial motion for summary judgment was granted for all claims except retaliation. Following this, Defendant filed a second motion for summary judgment on the remaining retaliation claim. The court granted Defendant's second summary judgment motion, concluding that Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for retaliation, specifically noting the absence of protected activity and materially adverse employment action.

Employment DiscriminationRetaliationTitle VIINew York State Human Rights LawSummary JudgmentRace DiscriminationGender DiscriminationProtected ActivityAdverse Employment ActionPro Se Litigant
References
24
Case No. ADJ3283274 (VNO 0386537) ADJ4545965 (VNO 0386536) ADJ3421140 (VNO 0347301)
Regular
Jan 25, 2010

BARBARA STRAUSS vs. WEST MARINE, INC., CIGA for RELIANCE in liquidation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the caption of a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying reconsideration. The error involved the incorrect assignment of ADJ and VNO numbers to the relevant case numbers. The WCAB is correcting this error to accurately reflect the case numbers as ADJ3283274 and VNO 0386537. This correction ensures proper record-keeping for applicant Barbara Strauss and defendants West Marine, Inc., et al.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorCorrected Case NumberADJ NumberVNO NumberReversal of NumbersLiquidation
References
0
Case No. ADJ7284005, ADJ7912473
Regular
Apr 06, 2017

RONALD PHILPOT vs. PERFORMANCE DAIRY SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, ULLICO CASUALTY COMPANY, IMPERIUM INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a clerical error in a March 17, 2017 Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board inadvertently swapped defendants between two consolidated cases (ADJ7912473 and ADJ7284005) and used an incorrect case number. The Board rescinded the prior decision and substituted a corrected version to accurately reflect the assigned defendants and case numbers. The corrected decision details the specific injuries, defendants, and awards for each applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorRescindedSubstitutedJoint Findings Award and OrdersIndustrial InjuryRight ShoulderBrainLeft KneeLumbar Spine
References
1
Case No. ADJ7998455
Regular
Sep 10, 2012

BOBBY RIVERA vs. STURGEON & SONS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

This case involves clerical errors in a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order denying reconsideration. Specifically, the case number and district office listing in the September 6, 2012 Opinion and Order were incorrect. The Board has issued an order to correct these errors by interlineation on the original document. The corrections involve adding the final "5" to the case number and changing the district office from "Grover Beach" to "San Luis Obispo."

Order Correcting Clerical ErrorsWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardOpinion and Order Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardADJ7998455San Luis Obispo District OfficeGrover Beach District OfficeInterlineations
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Arbitration between New York State Department of Correctional Services & New York State Correctional Officers

This case involves an appeal from a Supreme Court order vacating an arbitration award. Petitioners, the Department of Correctional Services and Governor's Office of Employee Relations, challenged an arbitrator's decision to grant a correction sergeant, Charles Hannigan, approximately $4,000 in vacation and holiday accruals. The arbitrator had initially issued an award with a 45-day suspension for Hannigan and then retained jurisdiction to ensure "made whole" implementation. Petitioners argued the arbitrator exceeded his power by reopening the arbitration. The Supreme Court agreed and vacated the award, a decision affirmed by the appellate court. The appellate court found that the arbitrator's retention of jurisdiction and subsequent reopening of the award violated explicit limitations in the collective bargaining agreement.

Arbitration awardVacaturArbitrator's jurisdictionCollective bargaining agreementPublic employmentCorrection officerBack payEmployee benefitsWaiverScope of arbitration
References
21
Case No. ADJ15751788
Regular
Jul 18, 2025

OLGA BENITEZ vs. MISSION FOODS, ARCH INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued an order on July 18, 2025, to rectify a clerical error in a prior decision dated May 29, 2025, concerning case number ADJ15751788. The error involved the omission of the case number from the caption of the earlier Opinion and Order Granting Petition For Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration. The Board clarified that this correction was made without the need for granting reconsideration, citing that such errors can be corrected at any time. Additionally, an earlier Petition for Removal, related to the same parties, was dismissed on May 29, 2025, subsequent to its withdrawal by the petitioner.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorOpinion and OrderCase NumberPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAdjudication NumberGallagher Bassett ServicesArch Indemnity InsuranceMission Foods
References
2
Case No. ADJ9760064
Regular
Jul 12, 2016

FRANKLIN POWERS vs. TEN WEST TOWING-PTO, SERVICES/STRUCTURE AND CLAIMS RESERVE MANAGEMENT, et al.

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order corrects a clerical error in their prior July 1, 2016 decision. Specifically, it amends a mistaken case reference on page 1, line 17, to accurately cite the companion case of Lawrence O'Donnell, ADJ9681671. The purpose of this order is solely to rectify the incorrect case number for administrative accuracy. This correction does not alter the substance or outcome of the Board's original ruling.

Clerical errorOrder correcting clerical errorOpinion and Order Granting RemovalAppeals BoardCompanion caseLawrence O'DonnellADJ9681671Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationSan Francisco District Office
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 01, 1992

Seelig v. Sielaff

The Supreme Court, New York County, initially issued a judgment enjoining respondents from releasing the social security numbers of correction officers without their consent and ordered the implementation of privacy safeguards. This judgment was subsequently reversed on appeal, vacated, and the proceeding was converted to one for a declaratory judgment. The appellate court declared that the release of correction officers' social security numbers by the respondents, in response to a Public Officers Law § 87 request, constituted an unwarranted invasion of privacy under Public Officers Law § 89 (2), citing federal precedents. The injunctive relief previously granted was also deemed improper as the Personal Privacy Protection Law (Public Officers Law § 92 [1]) exempts local government units and the judiciary from its provisions.

Freedom of Information LawPrivacy InvasionSocial Security NumbersCorrection OfficersPublic Officers LawDeclaratory JudgmentAppellate ReviewGovernment RecordsConfidentialityCPLR Article 78
References
9
Showing 1-10 of 17,676 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational