CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ANA 0347858
Regular
Sep 12, 2008

KEYIN L. ROSS vs. SAN DIEGO CHARGERS and LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (CIGA), SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, KANSAS CITY CHIEFS, TIG

The WCA's decision is affirmed for two reasons: Kansas City is wrong in claiming that San Diego was self-insured, and CIGA's statutes preclude Kansas City from recovering from San Diego.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCIGALegion Insurance CompanyKansas City ChiefsSan Diego Chargerscontributioninsolvent insurercovered claimsInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(5)deductible reimbursement
References
5
Case No. ADJ4357759 (SDO 0267149) ADJ4317475 (SDO 0359844)
Regular
Sep 09, 2010

SUSAN KUJAWA vs. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied San Diego Unified School District's petition for reconsideration regarding apportionment of temporary disability liability. The Board found that jurisdiction was not barred by the five-year statute of limitations, as the issue of temporary disability remained outstanding until settlement approval. The Board upheld its prior decision to apportion 94% of temporary disability to San Diego Unified and 6% to Novato Unified, based on the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion and party stipulations. San Diego Unified's arguments regarding jurisdiction and reliance on the AME's medical opinion were found to be without merit.

ApportionmentTemporary DisabilityPetition for ReconsiderationAgreed Medical Evaluator (AME)Stipulations and AwardsJurisdictionStatute of LimitationsContributionMedical OpinionPermanent Disability
References
6
Case No. SDO 0249452
Regular
May 12, 2008

GAIL GODFREY vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE ENTERPRISE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION by BROADSPIRE for SUPERIOR PACIFIC CASUALTY COMPANY

The California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board found that the County of San Diego was the applicant's special employer, making them jointly and severally liable for her injury. This determination was made despite a contract stating the applicant was not a County employee, as the Board found sufficient evidence of San Diego's control over her work. Consequently, the County is considered "other insurance available" to the applicant, meaning CIGA is not liable for her benefits.

CIGAcovered claimspecial employergeneral employerlabor brokerageindustrial injuryinsolvent insurerother insurancejoint and several liabilitycontractual exclusion
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

San Antonio Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of San Antonio

The San Antonio Building and Construction Trades Council (SABTC) and individual representatives challenged the City of San Antonio regarding prevailing wage requirements for construction workers on a convention center hotel project. SABTC argued that Chapter 2258 of the Texas Government Code mandated prevailing wages, but the trial court denied this, finding that despite being a 'public work', no 'public funds' were used for its construction. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment. It determined that public funds pledged as security for revenue bonds, or the bonds themselves, did not constitute public funds used for the 'construction' of the project under the relevant statute.

Prevailing Wage LawPublic WorksPublic FundsAssociational StandingLabor LawDeclaratory JudgmentTexas Government CodeRevenue BondsHotel Occupancy TaxStatutory Interpretation
References
16
Case No. 15-25-00093-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 19, 2025

State of Texas v. City of San Antonio, Ron Niremberg, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of San Antonio, and Erik Walsh, in His Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of San Antonio

The State sued the City of San Antonio, its Mayor, and its City Manager for ultra vires conduct under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, seeking declarations that the City’s plan to spend taxpayer dollars on travel for out-of-state abortions violates the Texas Constitution’s Gift Clause. The district court granted the City’s plea to the jurisdiction, asserting the claim was not ripe, and dismissed the suit. The State argues that the City’s plan to fund out-of-state abortion travel violates the Gift Clause by lacking public benefit, failing to serve a public purpose, and not retaining public control over funds. The State contends that delaying judicial review would cause great hardship due to the imminent risk of constitutional injury from the disbursement of funds, which the City intended to expedite before SB 33's effective date or by the end of its fiscal year. The State asserts the case is ripe for review because the illegal activity is "likely to occur," and despite SB 33 prohibiting such funding, the City's belief it can disburse funds by September 30, 2025, keeps the controversy live.

Public Funds MisuseAbortion Travel FundingTexas Gift ClauseRipeness DoctrineUltra Vires ActConstitutional ChallengeState-City ConflictReproductive Rights PolicyTaxpayer MoneyInjunctive Relief
References
89
Case No. 04-11-00402-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 29, 2012

City of San Antonio, and Its Agent, San Antonio Water System v. Albert Kevin Martin, A/K/A Kevin Martin

Albert Kevin Martin filed a whistleblower action against his former employer, San Antonio Water System (SAWS) and the City of San Antonio, alleging constructive discharge after reporting asbestos pipe disposal concerns to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). A jury initially found in Martin's favor, but SAWS appealed, disputing the causal link between Martin's report and his constructive discharge, and challenging the compensatory damages award. The appellate court affirmed the jury's finding of causation, concluding that SAWS's adverse actions were linked to Martin's whistleblowing, despite SAWS's alternative explanations. However, the court determined there was legally insufficient evidence to support the jury's award for past and future compensatory damages, particularly regarding mental anguish and chest pains, as the evidence presented did not meet the required legal standards for establishing such damages. Consequently, the appellate judgment was "AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED," deleting all references to compensatory damages from the trial court's judgment.

WhistleblowerConstructive DischargeRetaliationAsbestosEnvironmental ComplaintTCEQCausationCompensatory DamagesMental AnguishLegal Sufficiency
References
19
Case No. 04-14-00451-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 26, 2014

Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control, Inc. v. City of Public Service Board of San Antonio, a Municipal Board of the City of San Antonio

Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control, Inc. appealed an order granting a plea to the jurisdiction on its attorney's fees claim in a breach of contract suit against the City of San Antonio acting through the City Public Service Board (CPS). The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, affirmed the trial court's decision. The court determined that Chapter 271 of the Texas Local Government Code, as applicable to the 2004 contract, did not waive governmental immunity for attorney's fees. Furthermore, the court rejected arguments that CPS waived immunity by seeking affirmative relief or engaging in a proprietary function. The appellate court concluded that the trial court properly granted the plea to the jurisdiction due to the absence of a clear and unambiguous waiver of immunity for attorney's fees.

Governmental ImmunityAttorney's FeesBreach of ContractPlea to JurisdictionTexas Local Government CodeChapter 271Waiver of ImmunityProprietary FunctionSubject Matter JurisdictionAppellate Review
References
20
Case No. ADJ123485
Regular
Aug 21, 2014

AUGUSTINE BARRAGAN vs. MISSION BUILDERS HOME IMPROVEMENT, LP, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, KUKLAKI, INC, VICTORIA STATHIS, SAN DIEGO ROOFING, INC, GARY LOUGIAKIS, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

This case involves applicant Augustine Barragan against multiple defendants, including Mission Builders Home Improvement, LP and Kukliki, Inc. (dba San Diego Roofing), which are uninsured. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued an Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration. Pending a Decision After Reconsideration, all future filings and communications must be submitted in writing directly to the WCAB Commissioners' Office in San Francisco, not to any district office or via e-filing.

Augustine BarraganMission Builders Home Improvement LPCalifornia Insurance CompanyKuklaki Inc.San Diego Roofing Inc.uninsuredVictoria StathisGary LougiakisUninsured Employers Benefits Trust FundPetition for Reconsideration
References
0
Case No. ADJ755792
Regular

KIT DAWSON vs. SAN DIEGO TRANSIT

This case involves Kit Dawson's workers' compensation claim against San Diego Transit. The applicant, Dawson, sought reconsideration of a decision by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB reviewed the petition and the judge's report. Ultimately, the WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the reasoning of the administrative law judge.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgePermit Self-InsuredDenial of ReconsiderationCase ADJ755792Case SDO 0261150
References
0
Case No. ADJ8866375
Regular
Nov 18, 2016

KRISTINA SCOTT vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board concerns a petition for reconsideration filed by Kristina Scott against the County of San Diego. The WCJ issued a Findings, Award and Order on August 30, 2016. The petition for reconsideration has since been withdrawn by the applicant. Therefore, the Board has issued an order dismissing the petition for reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationWithdrawnDismissedFindings Award and OrderWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJSan Diego District OfficeApplicantDefendantAdministrative Law Judge
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 1,096 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational