CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ11706407
Regular
Apr 15, 2025

Matthew Hatchette vs. Oakland Raiders, TIG/Fairmont Premier Insurance Company, Jacksonville Jaguars, ACE American Insurance Company, New York Jets, USF&G, Chubb, Pacific Employers Insurance

This case concerns Matthew Hatchette, a former professional football player, and his claims of continuous trauma injuries against multiple NFL teams and their insurers. Defendant Jacksonville Jaguars filed a Petition for Reconsideration challenging the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) findings regarding jurisdiction and the applicability of res judicata. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the petition to conduct a thorough review of the factual and legal issues, thereby deferring a final decision on the merits. The Board's decision also addressed the timeliness of the petition under the recently amended Labor Code section 5909.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMatthew HatchetteOakland RaidersJacksonville JaguarsNew York JetsTIG/Fairmont Premier Insurance CompanyChubbUSF&GGallagher Bassett ServicesZenith Insurance Company
References
Case No. ADJ10305799
Regular
Oct 20, 2025

REBECCA BLUNT vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding an earlier order. The defendant challenged the Board's jurisdiction, contending the applicant's prior reconsideration petition was automatically denied due to inaction within 60 days. The Board acknowledged a split in authority on whether an order granting reconsideration for further study constitutes a final order, an issue currently pending before the Supreme Court in related cases. To preserve the defendant's rights, the Board granted the petition and deferred a final decision after reconsideration, maintaining its continuing jurisdiction over the matter.

Petition for ReconsiderationOpinion and Order Granting PetitionJurisdiction60-day ruleTransmissionElectronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS)Final OrderInterlocutory OrderContinuing JurisdictionRes Judicata
References
Case No. ADJ3138312 (WCK 0059967)
Regular
Jul 05, 2011

GREGORY McBEE vs. AMERICAN DESIGN ROOFING, CIGA, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board rescinded a prior award of temporary disability benefits because the applicant's period of temporary disability commenced more than five years after his date of injury. The Board found that Labor Code section 5410, which allows for claims of new and further disability within five years of injury, did not apply here. Jurisdiction to award temporary disability beyond five years is limited to continuous disability that began within that timeframe, which was not established. The case was returned for further proceedings on the issue of permanent disability.

Petition to reopennew and further disabilitytemporary disability indemnityjurisdictionfive-year limitationdate of injurystipulated awardAgreed Medical Evaluatorwrit deniedsubstantial medical evidence
References
Case No. ADJ3855232 (LAO 0400735)
Regular
Apr 01, 2015

Roberto Barrero vs. Knudsen Dairy Corporation, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

This case involves a dispute over the compensability of cardiovascular injury and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) following a 1975 industrial injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the findings that the applicant failed to prove CIDP was work-related but sustained his burden that cardiovascular treatment is a compensable consequence of the industrial injury. The WCAB clarified that enforcing medical treatment for the cardiovascular condition, which arose during authorized back surgery, falls under its continuing jurisdiction, not a prohibited amendment of the original award more than five years post-injury. Medical opinions regarding causation were found to constitute substantial evidence, resolving conflicting expert testimony.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRoberto BarreroKnudsen Dairy CorporationFireman's Fund Insurance CompanyADJ3855232Van Nuys District OfficeOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWCJindustrial injury
References
Case No. ADJ7828286
Regular
Oct 09, 2013

REGINALD GERMANY vs. BUFFALO BILLS, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinding the prior decision that California lacked jurisdiction over the applicant's cumulative trauma injury claim. The WCAB found that the prior judge improperly applied personal jurisdiction principles. The case is returned for further proceedings to determine if defendants are exempt from WCAB jurisdiction under Labor Code section 3600.5(b) or if jurisdiction should be declined based on a mandatory forum selection clause and limited connection to California, as established in relevant en banc decisions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCumulative Trauma InjuryJurisdictionProfessional Football PlayerMcKinley v. Arizona CardinalsLabor Code Section 3600.5(b)Carroll v. Cincinnati BrownsForum Selection ClauseLimited Connection to CaliforniaExtraterritorial Provisions
References
Case No. ADJ13302605; ADJ15813943
Regular
Mar 07, 2023

MATTHEW WARE vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC, GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKLEY ENTERTAINMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, reversing the WCJ's order to set the case for a Mandatory Settlement Conference on all issues. The Board found good cause to bifurcate and try the threshold issues of California subject matter and personal jurisdiction first. Bifurcating these jurisdictional issues is deemed more efficient, as a favorable ruling for the defendant would avoid further litigation. This decision prioritizes an expedited resolution of jurisdiction to facilitate the prompt delivery of potential benefits.

Petition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceBifurcationJurisdictionSubject Matter JurisdictionPersonal JurisdictionSpecial AppearanceDeclaration of ReadinessDiscoveryGood Cause
References
Case No. ADJ394938 (OAK 0328377)
Regular
Dec 16, 2015

LONDON MORROW vs. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

This case concerns an applicant who sustained a right shoulder injury in 2003 and was awarded temporary disability indemnity for a new period of disability in 2015. The defendant challenged this award, arguing the Board lacked jurisdiction to grant temporary disability more than five years after the injury date, as the applicant had not been continuously disabled. The majority of the Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report. However, a dissenting commissioner argued that Labor Code section 4656 and prior case law preclude jurisdiction for a new temporary disability period initiated more than five years post-injury, especially when disability was not continuous.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationTemporary Disability IndemnityDate of InjuryJurisdictionLabor Code Section 4656Nickelsberg v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Continuous DisabilityNew Period of Temporary DisabilityPermanent and Stationary
References
Case No. OAK 0274341
Regular
Sep 24, 2007

DAVID LAUDENBACH vs. CENTRAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SUPPLIES

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition challenging the WCJ's jurisdiction to award temporary disability benefits, finding that jurisdiction was not lost as the issue was deferred and the case remained open. The Board granted the applicant's petition, amending the award to defer the issue of temporary disability for a later period (January 19, 2005, through March 29, 2006) because a stipulated permanent and stationary date does not preclude a subsequent period of temporary disability. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine eligibility for this later period of temporary disability.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awardtemporary disability benefitsstatute of limitationspermanent and stationary dateres judicataEmployment Development Department (EDD) lienstipulationjurisdiction
References
Case No. ADJ7802502
Regular
Feb 08, 2017

ABRAHAM CHIMAL vs. MENZIES AVIATION, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case concerns whether California has jurisdiction over a workers' compensation claim. The defendant argued against California jurisdiction, citing applicant's termination and reapplication for employment in Texas. However, the Board denied the petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that California jurisdiction and law apply. The Board found substantial evidence of continuous employment, with the applicant hired in California and returning there.

JurisdictionCalifornia lawWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFinding of FactContinuous employmentTransferTermination formHoustonTexas
References
Case No. ADJ7617012, ADJ8069518
Regular
Jan 08, 2016

MARIANA CASTRO vs. DENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE dba SA SOLEIMANI DENTAL CORPORATION, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a stipulation and order to pay a lien claimant. The defendant argued the judge lacked jurisdiction as the lien claimant had been previously dismissed for failing to appear at a conference. The Board found the judge acted in excess of jurisdiction by approving the order while the dismissal order was still in effect. Good cause existed to rescind the order because the lien claimant was properly dismissed and failed to seek rescission before appearing at trial.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardLien Claimant DismissalPetition for ReconsiderationStipulation and OrderJurisdictionVoidable OrderGood CauseRescissionLabor CodeLien Conference
References
Showing 1-10 of 2,205 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational