In re Perra
Petitioner Scott Perra, on behalf of Faxton-St. Luke’s Healthcare, sought involuntary retention of Theresa Doe for mental health treatment and administration of Risperdal over her objection under Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33. Respondent, a 23-year-old pregnant female diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, refused medication due to pregnancy concerns. Physicians, including Dr. Bahram Omidian and Dr. B.E. Fard, assessed respondent as delusional, disorganized, and a danger to herself and her fetus without treatment. The court found that the petitioner met the burden for involuntary retention, citing respondent's impaired judgment and inability to make rational decisions regarding her health and the fetus. However, the court denied the application to forcibly administer Risperdal, noting the PDR's inconclusive information on fetal effects and upholding principles of autonomy, while permitting reapplication if respondent's condition decompensates. The court also judicially noticed the harmful effects of maternal smoking on a fetus and mandated an aggressive smoking cessation program for the respondent.