, SCOTT BOWEN, vs. , TAYLOR CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC.; and TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
The WCAB denied reconsideration of the decision finding the applicant's average weekly earnings (AWE) to be $403.29. The WCJ's decision on AWE was upheld.
Updated Daily
Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.
The WCAB denied reconsideration of the decision finding the applicant's average weekly earnings (AWE) to be $403.29. The WCJ's decision on AWE was upheld.
Defendant Zurich North America sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision awarding applicant benefits for injuries sustained as a carpenter. Zurich contested the date of injury, arguing it predated their coverage and denied due process by deferring this issue. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the case to the trial level. This action was taken because the WCJ failed to issue findings on all controverted issues, specifically the date of injury under Labor Code section 5412.
This case involved a carpenter, Jorge Mora, who sustained an industrial injury to his left hand while employed by CLP Resources, Inc. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the WCJ's prior decision finding that the injury was proximately caused by CLP Resources' serious and willful misconduct. The WCAB also upheld the WCJ's determination that the serious and willful misconduct claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The defendant's petition for reconsideration was denied, affirming the original award of compensation and attorney's fees.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded an arbitrator's findings due to an incomplete record, specifically the absence of a Minutes of Hearing and Summary of Evidence. TIG Specialty Insurance Company sought reconsideration, arguing the arbitrator erred in asserting WCAB jurisdiction over a mandatory "carve out" program for carpenters. The WCAB remanded the case for the arbitrator to create a proper record and issue a new decision on the coverage dispute. Additionally, the Van Nuys District Office will consider the submitted Compromise and Release Agreement.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied TIG Specialty Insurance Company's petition for reconsideration. TIG claimed its policy only covered non-carpenter employees at the LAUSD site. However, TIG failed to present the policy as evidence at either arbitration hearing. Therefore, the Board inferred the policy did cover the applicant's employment, upholding the arbitrator's decision.
This case concerns applicant's claim for extended temporary disability (TD) benefits beyond 104 weeks due to a left eye injury. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's denial of the "amputation" exception, ruling that the surgical removal of an eye does not fit the statutory definition. However, the Board remanded the case for further development of the record on the "high-velocity eye injury" exception, as the velocity and force of the object that struck the applicant's eye were unclear. The applicant's Petition for Removal was dismissed as reconsideration was the appropriate remedy.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an earlier decision regarding an applicant's temporary disability indemnity. The WCAB affirmed the 104-week limit for temporary disability but clarified that this period begins from the date of the first payment, not the date of injury, per Labor Code section 4656(c)(1). The WCAB also noted it lacks jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the statute and adopted the administrative law judge's reasoning on this point.
Defendant sought reconsideration of a monetary sanction. The WCJ's report recommended granting the petition, vacating the sanctions, and ordering defendant to pay fees and release withheld indemnity. Reconsideration was granted, the prior order was rescinded, and a new order was substituted.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a previous award due to an inadequate explanation in the judge's opinion regarding the denial of injury to body parts other than the low back and right knee. Specifically, evidence suggested a potential injury to the applicant's rib area, characterized as costochondritis, which the judge failed to adequately address. The Board rescinded the prior award and remanded the case for further proceedings and a new decision that properly explains the reasoning and addresses the evidence concerning the claimed injuries. This allows for the development of the medical record to determine if further treatment or permanent disability resulted from any injury to the rib area.
The WCAB granted reconsideration and increased applicant's permanent disability rating from 50% to 56%, with indemnity payments commencing November 12, 2007. The Board affirmed the application of the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule based on defendant's failure to provide required notice after a hiatus in temporary disability payments. Additionally, the Board admitted applicant's medical reports into evidence and affirmed the WCJ's amended award.
Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.