CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ8743108
Regular
Dec 21, 2015

HELIBERTO AISPURO vs. SHAKEYS USA, INCORPORATED, THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Heliberto Aispuro's Petition for Reconsideration due to a failure to comply with WCAB Rule 10842(b) and relevant case law requiring specific citations to the record. The petitioner did not make a reasonable effort to reference evidence supporting their claims. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report as the basis for dismissal, which would have been granted on the merits even without the procedural deficiency. Additionally, the applicant failed to properly serve all adverse parties.

Petition for ReconsiderationWCAB Rule 10842(b)Specific CitationsRecord ReferencesAppellate ProceedingsLabor Code Section 5905Adverse PartiesDismissalAdministrative Law JudgeEvidentiary Statements
References
Case No. ADJ2823789 (SAC 0369557)
Regular
Jun 18, 2019

PATRICIA WOODS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Patricia Woods' petition for reconsideration as untimely. The petition was filed more than 25 days after the Administrative Law Judge's decision was served, exceeding the statutory deadline. The WCAB emphasized that failure to file within the jurisdictional time limit prevents the Board from considering the petition. Additionally, the petition failed to provide adequate citations to the record, a requirement for appellate review.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingJurisdictional Time LimitWCAB Rule 10507WCAB Rule 10508WCAB Rule 10845WCAB Rule 10392Proof of FilingProof of ServiceLegal Uninsured
References
Case No. ADJ2140586
Regular
Sep 01, 2009

ARMANDO AVILA-GONZALEZ vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

The Appeals Board reversed a WCJ's decision to reopen a case, finding no "good cause" based on a purported change in law. The WCJ had relied on the *Vera* case to apply an older disability rating schedule, but subsequent appellate decisions created a conflict, not a definitive change, in the law. The Board determined *Vera* remained citable and that the evidence did not support reopening or a finding of permanent disability. Therefore, the applicant's petition to reopen was denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationPetition to ReopenGood CauseChange in LawVera v. WCABPermanent Disability Rating ScheduleLabor Code Section 4660(d)Permanent and Stationary StatusMedical Reports
References
Case No. ADJ6690678
Regular
May 24, 2012

PEDRO RAMIREZ vs. PCL CONSTRUCTION, RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

In **Ramirez v. PCL Construction**, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's Petition for Removal. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge, finding no basis to grant the removal. Notably, the WCAB clarified that the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) is not involved, and therefore, a reference to "other insurance" in the judge's report was disregarded. The decision effectively upholds the status quo of the case as determined by the administrative law judge.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalWCJ ReportDenying RemovalCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGAOther InsuranceAdministrative Law JudgeLabor LawIndustrial Accident
References
Case No. ADJ7630224
Regular
Nov 29, 2012

TINA SPERBER vs. LAW OFFICES OF LISA M. PACIONE

This case involves Tina Sperber's workers' compensation claim against her employer, Law Offices of Lisa M. Pacione. The applicant, a legal assistant, sustained an injury while investigating a property related to a case, claiming implied authorization. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the judge's finding that the applicant was not a credible witness regarding her authority. The Board agreed that the applicant lacked permission for the investigation and that the information gathered provided no benefit to the defendant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDenying ReconsiderationLegal AssistantLaw OfficesInvestigationImplied AuthorizationCredibilityBenefit to DefendantFamily Law ProceedingsAdministrative Law Judge
References
Case No. ADJ2987188 (LBO 0277672) ADJ6543172
Regular
Sep 15, 2015

LUPE CHAVEZ vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

This order denies Lupe Chavez's Petition for Reconsideration in her workers' compensation case against the County of Los Angeles and Tristar Risk Management. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report. Therefore, the denial of reconsideration stands.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law Judge ReportDenying ReconsiderationCounty of Los AngelesTristar Risk ManagementCase Number ADJ2987188Case Number ADJ6543172San FranciscoCalifornia
References
Case No. ADJ9160815
Regular
Jun 10, 2014

ALMA CEDILLO vs. CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

This case involves an applicant, Alma Cedillo, seeking workers' compensation benefits from Cedars Sinai Medical Center and Tristar Risk Management. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued an order denying a Petition for Removal filed in the case. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in reaching its decision to deny removal. Therefore, the applicant's request to remove the case from the current process was rejected.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCedars Sinai Medical CenterTristar Risk ManagementAdministrative Law JudgeADJ9160815Van Nuys District OfficeAlma Cedillodenying removalworkers' compensation
References
Case No. STK 0188538
Regular
Jul 02, 2008

DAVID DYKES vs. E. & J. GALLO WINERY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition to reopen a prior award due to a change in the law established by the Supreme Court in *Brodie v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.* This change in law clarified the method for calculating permanent disability indemnity after apportionment, overriding a prior appellate court decision that the Board had relied on. Consequently, the Board rescinded the previous decision, granted the petition to reopen, and remanded the case to recalculate permanent disability indemnity based on the controlling Supreme Court precedent.

WCABPetition to ReopenReconsiderationRes JudicataGood CauseChange of LawLaw of the CaseApportionmentPermanent Disability IndemnityLabor Code Sections 4663
References
Showing 1-10 of 12,055 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational