CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 06, 2012

Claim of Smith v. Oneida Ltd.

The claimant appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision concerning her husband's death benefits. In 1991, the decedent sustained a compensable lung injury, leading to permanent partial disability and continuous workers' compensation benefits until his death in September 2010. The Workers' Compensation Law Judge and the Board affirmed that the death was causally related to his work-related illness, awarding death benefits to the claimant. The self-insured employer and its claims administrator appealed this decision. The court affirmed the Board's decision, citing that a compensable illness need not be the sole cause of death, only a contributing factor. Evidence included the death certificate listing sepsis and respiratory failure, and a C-64 medical report from the decedent's long-term physician stating the death was directly or indirectly caused by the work-related illness.

death benefitscausal relationshipoccupational illnessrespiratory failuresepsispermanent partial disabilityWorkers' Compensation Board appealmedical report evidencecontributing factor
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 03, 2003

Beesmer v. Village of DeRuyter Fire Department

In 1975, the decedent, a volunteer firefighter, suffered a heart attack and continuously received workers' compensation benefits until his death in 2002. His claimant applied for death benefits, alleging a causal link between the 1975 injury and his death. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) awarded benefits after denying the employer's request for a second adjournment to depose treating physicians, a decision affirmed by the Workers' Compensation Board. The court found substantial evidence supporting the causal relationship between the heart attack and death, noting that a work-related injury need not be the sole cause of death. Additionally, the court upheld the WCLJ's denial of the adjournment, as the employer failed to provide a sufficient excuse for not scheduling depositions or serving subpoenas during the initial adjournment period.

Workers' Compensation Death BenefitsCausal RelationshipHeart AttackCongestive Heart FailureAdjournment DenialTreating Physician DepositionSubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewMedical OpinionVolunteer Firefighter
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Estate of Moody v. Quality Structures, Inc.

Decedent, a laborer, collapsed and died on his first day of work at a construction site while pouring and raking concrete. His estate applied for workers' compensation death benefits for his children. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed the claim, invoking the presumption of compensability under Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 (1), as the employer failed to rebut it with substantial evidence. An independent medical report by cardiologist Stephen Nash attributed death to cardiac arrhythmia and enlarged heart, with lack of sleep as a contributory factor, but did not rule out work involvement. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding the cause of the fatal arrhythmia unexplained and the employer's evidence insufficient to overcome the presumption.

Workers' Compensation Death BenefitsCausally Related EmploymentPresumption of CompensabilityCardiac ArrhythmiaEnlarged HeartIndependent Medical ReportConstruction Laborer DeathUnexplained CollapseRebuttal of PresumptionSubstantial Evidence
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of Hill-Chapman v. Earlybird Delivery Systems, LLC

Gerald Chapman, a dispatcher, collapsed and died at work on December 25, 2011, from a pulmonary embolism of unknown cause. His estate filed a claim for death benefits, which the Workers’ Compensation Board established, applying the Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 presumption that unexplained accidents in the course of employment arise out of such employment. The employer appealed, arguing that an independent medical report by Vinay Das could not determine the cause of death and requested cross-examination of the medical examiner and access to decedent’s medical records. The Appellate Division reversed the Board's decision, remitting the matter for the Board to address the employer's contention regarding the denial of access to medical records, while upholding the Board's application of the Section 21 presumption and denial of cross-examination.

Workers' Compensation BenefitsUnexplained DeathPulmonary Embolism CausationPresumption Against EmployerMedical Evidence AdmissibilityRight to Cross-ExamineMedical Record DiscoveryAppellate Division ReviewRemand for Further ProceedingsEmployment-Related Injury
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 05, 2013

Mohan v. Atlantic Court, LLC

Edward Mohan sustained injuries at a construction site and later died. His representatives, the plaintiffs, filed an action for personal injuries and wrongful death against the site owner, Atlantic Court, LLC, and the general contractors, Kit Construction, LLC, and Kit Construction Co., Inc. The general contractors then brought a third-party action against Mohan's employer, Eagle One Roofing Contractors, Inc., the subcontractor. The Supreme Court's order granted summary judgment dismissing the wrongful death cause of action and parts of the indemnification claims. On appeal, the order was modified: summary judgment on the wrongful death claim was denied due to factual disputes regarding the causation of Mohan's death, and summary judgment for common-law indemnification against Eagle One was denied due to a factual issue on whether Mohan suffered a grave injury. However, the contractual indemnification claims against Eagle One by Kit Construction Co., Inc. and Atlantic Court, LLC, were affirmed.

Personal InjuryWrongful DeathSummary JudgmentContractual IndemnificationCommon-Law IndemnificationConstruction AccidentSubcontractor LiabilityGeneral ContractorAppellate ReviewCausation (Medical)
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Fatima v. MTA Bridges & Tunnels

The claimant appealed a decision from the Workers’ Compensation Board that denied death benefits to her husband. The decedent, a maintenance worker, was found unconscious in a locker room at work and later died. The Board denied the claim, stating his death was not causally related to his employment. The appellate court affirmed this decision, finding the presumption of compensability for unwitnessed deaths was rebutted by substantial evidence. A medical expert determined the cause of death was arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, unrelated to work activities, and noted the decedent's pre-existing hypertension for which he failed to seek treatment. There was no evidence of strenuous activity at the time of his demise.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsCausal RelationshipArteriosclerotic Cardiovascular DiseaseHypertensionPresumption of CompensabilityUnwitnessed DeathMedical Expert TestimonyAppellate ReviewEmployer Liability
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Bordonaro v. Genesee County Sheriff's Office

Claimant appealed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision denying death benefits to the spouse of a deputy sheriff who died at home from coronary artery disease. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge initially established the claim, but the Board reversed, finding no causal relationship between death and employment. The claimant argued the presumption of compensability applied as an initial injury occurred at work, but the court found no evidence of an injury at work. The claimant's medical expert opined death was due to an acute myocardial infarction caused by work-related stress, but the Board and appellate court rejected this as speculative. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence to support the lack of causal connection between employment and death.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsCausal RelationshipCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionWork-Related StressPresumption of CompensabilityMedical OpinionAppellate ReviewDeputy Sheriff
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rosemond v. Harshaw Chemical Co.

The plaintiffs appealed from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, which granted summary judgment to defendants Harshaw Chemical Company and Bartholomew Company, Inc. in an action to recover damages for wrongful death. The decedent, an employee of Astro-Electro, Inc., died after falling into a vat of corrosive acid while removing fallen parts, alleging defendants' negligent design of a horizontal drive system caused the parts to fall. The defendants argued their negligence was not a proximate cause, as parts frequently fell, and Astro's failure to provide safety precautions constituted an intervening cause. The appellate court affirmed the order, concluding that the accident would have occurred regardless of the defendants' alleged negligence and that Astro's egregious negligence served as an intervening cause, thereby absolving the defendants of liability.

Wrongful DeathSummary JudgmentProximate CauseIntervening CauseNegligenceProduct LiabilityWorkplace AccidentAppellate ReviewForeseeabilityCausation
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Wallace v. Nestles Chocolate Co.

The claimant appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision denying death benefits for her decedent, a forklift operator who died post-surgery for a work-related hand injury. The decedent experienced respiratory and cardiac arrest due to myocardial infarction, exacerbated by pre-existing conditions and inadequate postoperative care. The Board concluded the death was not causally related to the compensable injury. The appellate court affirmed the decision, finding that while the surgery provided the occasion for inadequate treatment, it did not directly cause the death, which stemmed from the progression of his underlying cardiac condition.

Workers' CompensationMyocardial InfarctionPostoperative ComplicationsCausationPreexisting ConditionInadequate Medical CareAppellate ReviewBoard DecisionDeath BenefitsHand Injury
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Estate of Matusko v. Kennedy Valve Manufacturing Co.

Martin Matusko suffered work-related injuries in 1981, leading to a declaration of permanent total disability in 1989. Following his death in 1995, the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier appealed the Workers’ Compensation Board's decision, which found Matusko’s death causally related to the 1981 accident. The Board's determination was based on evidence that the accident rendered symptomatic a pre-existing cranio-cervical junction abnormality, causing conditions like sleep apnea and seizures. Despite conflicting medical opinions, including one from an impartial specialist, the court affirmed the Board's decision, deferring to its function to resolve conflicting medical evidence. The court found the Board's acceptance of Matusko's physician's opinion, which linked the death to the accident, to have a rational basis.

Workers CompensationCausal RelationshipDeath BenefitsPermanent Total DisabilitySleep ApneaBasilar Invagination SyndromeMedical OpinionSubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewPre-existing Condition
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 5,210 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational