CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9271759
Regular
Jun 10, 2015

JIMMIE HARTMAN vs. TOWN OF SCOTIA COMPANY PACIFIC LUMBER

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's May 10, 2015 decision incorrectly listed the service date as May 10, 2015. The Board has corrected this clerical error to reflect the accurate service date of June 10, 2015. This correction was made without granting reconsideration, as such errors can be corrected at any time.

Clerical errorDate of serviceCorrectionAppeals BoardReconsiderationSupplemental ProceedingsOrder Denying PetitionAmended dateWorkers' CompensationTown of Scotia
References
1
Case No. ADJ6635167
Regular
Aug 01, 2011

CDWARD CARTER vs. MONTEREY MARRIOTT

This case involves a clerical error correction by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB's prior Order, issued June 17, 2011, incorrectly titled and referenced a "disqualification" instead of "removal." The Board is correcting the title to "Order Denying Removal" and substituting "removal" for "disqualification" throughout the order. This correction was made to ensure clarity and understanding of the Board's decision, and the WCAB retains jurisdiction to correct such clerical errors.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Correcting Clerical ErrorOrder Denying RemovalPetition for RemovalDisqualificationMonterey MarriottADJ6635167Toccalino v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Clerical ErrorsRemoval
References
1
Case No. ADJ1117454 (AHM 0147671)
Regular
Nov 08, 2019

LINDA KIEHLMEIER vs. CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ADJUSTED BY CRUM & FORSTER

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) case concerns a clerical error in the service date of a prior decision. The WCAB issued an Opinion and Order Correcting Clerical Error to amend the service date of a decision from October 8, 2019, to November 8, 2019. The Board has the authority to correct such errors without further proceedings. This correction is made pursuant to relevant legal precedent and practice guides.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDLINDA KIEHLMEIERCALIFORNIA EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUPTRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICAUNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYCRUM & FORSTERADJ1117454AHM 0147671Van Nuys District OfficeOPINION AND ORDER CORRECTING CLERICAL ERROR
References
2
Case No. ADJ1839782 (GOL 0101821), ADJ2471155 (GOL 0101822), ADJ3556721 (GOL 0101823)
Regular
Nov 20, 2012

JEANETTE ZINKE vs. MENTOR CORPORATION, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY-BEAVERTON

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involved a clerical error in the caption of a prior Order Denying Reconsideration. The order erroneously listed "Employers Compensation" as the defendant insurance carrier instead of the correct entity, "Liberty Mutual Insurance Company-Beaverton." The Board issued this order to correct that clerical error. Such corrections are permissible at any time without further proceedings.

Order Denying ReconsiderationClerical Error CorrectionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLiberty Mutual Insurance Company-BeavertonEmployers CompensationCaption CorrectionAlfonso J. MoralesRonnie G. CaplaneFrank M. BrassGOL District Office
References
1
Case No. ADJ9105445
Regular
Dec 01, 2009

CHARLES STUMPH vs. COUNTY OF ORANGE, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

This case concerns a clerical error in a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) opinion. The error involved misidentifying a defendant in the initial sentence of a paragraph. The WCAB has issued an order correcting this clerical error to accurately reflect that the applicant, Charles Stumph, entered into a compromise and release agreement with the County of Orange Sheriff's Department. This correction was made without granting further reconsideration, as such errors can be amended at any time. The Board's original decision rescinded the administrative law judge's findings and approved the compromise and release agreement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorReconsiderationLabor Code Section 132aFindings of Fact and OrderCompromise and ReleaseWCJWCAB Rule 10882Labor Code Section 5001Labor Code Section 5002
References
2
Case No. ADJ3023725 (STK 0186210), ADJ6853419
Regular
Mar 04, 2016

IGNACIO ROA vs. ROHRER BROTHERS/ GENERAL PRODUCE, FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK, XL SPECIALTY/ BROADSPIRE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration mistakenly listed the service date as March 3, 2016. The Appeals Board issued an order to correct this error, amending the service date to March 4, 2016. This correction was made without granting reconsideration, as such clerical errors can be rectified at any time.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDClerical ErrorDate of ServiceOpinion and OrderReconsiderationAmended DateSupplemental ProceedingsLiquidated Insurance CompanyCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationSedgwick
References
0
Case No. ADJ9437719
Regular
Jul 03, 2018

MARIA RODRIGUEZ vs. BODEGA LATINA CORPORATION dba EL SUPER, YORK RISK SERIVCES, SAFETY NATIONAL

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board is issuing an order to correct a clerical error in its June 20, 2018 decision. The prior decision, which denied a petition for reconsideration in the case of Maria Rodriguez v. Bodega Latina Corporation, failed to include the official seal of the Appeals Board. This correction is being made without granting reconsideration, as clerical errors can be rectified at any time. The corrected order will now properly include the Appeals Board's seal.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDBODEGA LATINA CORPORATIONEL SUPERYORK RISK SERIVCESSAFETY NATIONALADJ9437719OPINION AND ORDER CORRECTING CLERICAL ERRORclerical errorseal of the Appeals BoardReconsideration
References
0
Case No. ADJ4088637 (RIV 0053165) ADJ622123 (RIV 0068585)
Regular
May 26, 2010

JAMES B. OTT vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM

This case involves an applicant seeking to correct a clerical error in a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision. The applicant correctly points out that the previously awarded commencement date for temporary total disability indemnity was January 23, 2004, whereas a lower decision had established it as January 23, 2003. The defendant did not dispute the earlier commencement date during their prior reconsideration petition. The WCAB reviewed the file and determined the January 23, 2004 date was indeed a clerical error, ordering its correction to January 23, 2003.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition to Correct Clerical ErrorTemporary Total Disability IndemnityCommencement DateService RetirementAmended Findings and AwardWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeOpinion and Decision after ReconsiderationJoint Findings of Fact
References
3
Case No. ADJ1226686 (WCK 60788)
Regular
Oct 29, 2008

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board corrected a clerical error in a prior decision, specifically changing a finding from "Defendant did unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment" to "Defendant did *not* unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment." This correction was made after the defendant alerted the Board to the mistake, and the Board exercised its authority to correct clerical errors at any time. Consequently, the defendant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as moot.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDCLERICAL ERRORPETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONLABOR CODE § 5814MEDICAL TREATMENTDELAYREFUSALDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATIONCORRECTINGDISMISSAL
References
1
Case No. ADJ9737947
Regular
Apr 15, 2016

DOUGLAS CRINGEAN vs. WARNER BROS. STUDIO FACILITIES, WARNER BROS. WORKERS' COMPENSATION

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, involving Douglas Cringean and Warner Bros. Studio Facilities, concerns a clerical error in a prior decision's caption. The Board's decision served on April 11, 2016, incorrectly stated the caption as "Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration." The Board is correcting this to the accurate caption, "Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration." This correction is permissible as clerical errors can be rectified at any time without further proceedings.

Clerical ErrorCaption CorrectionPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAMENDED captionSupplemental ProceedingsADJ9737947Warner Bros. Studio FacilitiesDouglas Cringean
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 2,834 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational