CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. CA 12-01143
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 01, 2013

PROFESSIONAL, CLERICAL, TECHNICAL, MTR. OF

This case involves an appeal to the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, concerning an arbitration award. The petitioner, Professional, Clerical, Technical, Employees Association, sought to vacate an arbitration award, which the Supreme Court, Erie County, initially granted. The respondent, Board of Education for Buffalo City School District, appealed this decision. The Appellate Division reversed the lower court's order, denying the petition to vacate and granting the cross-petition to confirm the arbitration award. The court concluded that the arbitrator's interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement regarding employee qualifications for new positions was neither irrational nor an exceeding of authority. The arbitrator's decision upheld the supervisor's discretion in assessing qualifications beyond minimum requirements for Assistant Management Analyst positions.

ArbitrationCollective Bargaining AgreementJudicial ReviewLabor LawAppellate DivisionSupervisor DiscretionEmployee QualificationsContract InterpretationNew York LawSchool District
References
15
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 02083 [181 AD3d 949]
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 25, 2020

Klingsberg v. Council of Sch. Supervisors & Adm'rs-Local 1

The plaintiff, Joan Klingsberg, a tenured principal, was removed from her payroll by the New York City Department of Education (DOE) due to financial improprieties. She was represented by Charity Guerra, a staff attorney from her union, the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators-Local 1 (CSA), during disciplinary proceedings. After it was revealed Guerra sought a position with the DOE, Klingsberg declined a new attorney and represented herself. Although the arbitrator upheld termination, the DOE Chancellor overturned it, imposing a six-month suspension and returning Klingsberg to a non-administrative teaching position with back pay, followed by a $200,000 settlement. Klingsberg later sued Guerra for legal malpractice and violation of Judiciary Law § 487, alleging a conflict of interest. The Supreme Court granted Guerra's motion to dismiss, finding the action preempted by federal law and barred by a prior release agreement.

Legal MalpracticeJudiciary Law § 487Federal Labor Management Relations ActPreemptionCollective BargainingConflict of InterestRelease AgreementMotion to DismissAppellate DivisionQueens County
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Council of School Supervisors & Administrators, Local 1 v. New York City Department of Education

The Council of School Supervisors and Administrators (CSA) challenged the City's plan to reduce parking permits for school employees, arguing it violated their collective bargaining agreement. An arbitrator initially sided with CSA, directing the reinstatement of permits. However, the Supreme Court's decision to confirm this award was deemed erroneous by the appellate court. The appellate court found the arbitration award violated public policy, was irrational, and exceeded the arbitrator's authority because the power to issue on-street parking permits lies exclusively with the City's Department of Transportation (DOT), not the Department of Education (DOE). The court emphasized that the award essentially transferred DOT's regulatory authority to DOE and undermined the city's objectives to reduce congestion and pollution. Consequently, the arbitration award was vacated.

Labor disputeParking permitsCollective bargaining agreementArbitration awardPublic policy violationAdministrative lawMunicipal authorityTraffic regulationDepartment of TransportationDepartment of Education
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Romaine v. New York City Transit Authority

Petitioners, Local 106 Transport Workers Union and Richard LaManna, initiated a proceeding to prevent the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) from mandating track safety training for property protection supervisors. The Supreme Court, Kings County, denied the petition, citing the petitioners' failure to exhaust administrative remedies and asserted Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) jurisdiction over improper labor practice claims. The appellate court reversed this judgment, ruling that the existing collective bargaining agreement was solely between the Union and the nonparty Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA), not the NYCTA, making its grievance procedures inapplicable to the NYCTA. Furthermore, the court found that PERB lacked jurisdiction because the NYCTA was not the employer of the supervisors. Consequently, the petition was granted, prohibiting the NYCTA from enforcing mandatory track safety training.

Labor LawCollective Bargaining AgreementAdministrative RemediesPublic Employment Relations BoardProhibition ProceedingTrack Safety TrainingProperty Protection SupervisorsManhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York City Transit AuthorityExhaustion Doctrine
References
4
Case No. ADJ1839782 (GOL 0101821), ADJ2471155 (GOL 0101822), ADJ3556721 (GOL 0101823)
Regular
Nov 20, 2012

JEANETTE ZINKE vs. MENTOR CORPORATION, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY-BEAVERTON

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involved a clerical error in the caption of a prior Order Denying Reconsideration. The order erroneously listed "Employers Compensation" as the defendant insurance carrier instead of the correct entity, "Liberty Mutual Insurance Company-Beaverton." The Board issued this order to correct that clerical error. Such corrections are permissible at any time without further proceedings.

Order Denying ReconsiderationClerical Error CorrectionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLiberty Mutual Insurance Company-BeavertonEmployers CompensationCaption CorrectionAlfonso J. MoralesRonnie G. CaplaneFrank M. BrassGOL District Office
References
1
Case No. ADJ6635167
Regular
Aug 01, 2011

CDWARD CARTER vs. MONTEREY MARRIOTT

This case involves a clerical error correction by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB's prior Order, issued June 17, 2011, incorrectly titled and referenced a "disqualification" instead of "removal." The Board is correcting the title to "Order Denying Removal" and substituting "removal" for "disqualification" throughout the order. This correction was made to ensure clarity and understanding of the Board's decision, and the WCAB retains jurisdiction to correct such clerical errors.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Correcting Clerical ErrorOrder Denying RemovalPetition for RemovalDisqualificationMonterey MarriottADJ6635167Toccalino v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Clerical ErrorsRemoval
References
1
Case No. ADJ236966 (MON 0309477)
Regular
Jan 27, 2015

HERMELINDA CLARA vs. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

This case involves a clerical error in a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board is issuing an interim order to correct the service date of its Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration from December 6, 2015, to January 6, 2015. The error was identified as a simple clerical mistake. The matter remains pending before the Commissioners of the WCAB.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardInterim OrderClerical ErrorPetition for ReconsiderationDate of ServiceSupplemental ProceedingsOffice of the CommissionersAmendedRonnie G. CaplaneFrank M. Brass
References
1
Case No. ADJ11720540
Regular
Nov 08, 2019

SHEILA BROWN vs. COMPASS HEALTH, MURPHY BEANE

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's Opinion and Order, dated October 8, 2019, was mistakenly stamped as served on that date. The actual service date was November 8, 2019. The Board issued this order to correct the clerical error to reflect the accurate service date without requiring further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorDate of ServiceOpinion and OrderReconsiderationPetition for RemovalDecision After RemovalAmended DateSan Luis ObispoJohn Spatafore Law Firm
References
2
Case No. ADJ11091707
Regular
Apr 09, 2018

LEILANI MOLINA vs. MSLA/UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, administered by SEDGWICK

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, ADJ11091707, involves a clerical error in the original decision. The Board's February 16, 2017 decision mistakenly listed the service date as February 16, 2017, when it should have been February 16, 2018. The Board corrected this clerical error, citing its authority to do so at any time without further proceedings. No other changes were made to the original February 16, 2018 Opinion.

Clerical errorDate of serviceCorrecting errorOpinion and OrderAppeals BoardWorkers' CompensationToccalino v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Supplemental ProceedingsPetition for RemovalAmended date
References
2
Case No. ADJ9271759
Regular
Jun 10, 2015

JIMMIE HARTMAN vs. TOWN OF SCOTIA COMPANY PACIFIC LUMBER

This case involves a clerical error in the date of service for a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board's May 10, 2015 decision incorrectly listed the service date as May 10, 2015. The Board has corrected this clerical error to reflect the accurate service date of June 10, 2015. This correction was made without granting reconsideration, as such errors can be corrected at any time.

Clerical errorDate of serviceCorrectionAppeals BoardReconsiderationSupplemental ProceedingsOrder Denying PetitionAmended dateWorkers' CompensationTown of Scotia
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 968 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational