CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ2785097 (LAO 0781834)
Regular
Aug 23, 2010

TOMAS MOYOTL vs. C&D AEROSPACE, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICE on behalf of HIH INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation

Defendant C&D Aerospace petitioned for removal after the WCJ set the case for trial without ruling on outstanding discovery disputes. The disputes involve compelling further deposition of the applicant and his wife (a lien claimant for home health care) and requiring the applicant to meet with defendant's home health expert. The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the trial setting order, and returned the matter to the trial level for a status conference to resolve discovery issues. This ensures the defendant can obtain necessary discovery before the case proceeds to trial, preventing potential prejudice.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalRescind OrderCompel Further DepositionLien ClaimantHome Health CareIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityPre-trial DiscoveryPetition to Compel
References
Case No. ADJ8459000
Regular
Nov 13, 2015

LILIA RODRIGUEZ vs. ESPARZA ENTERPRISES, INC

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant Esparza Enterprises' petition for removal of an order suspending action regarding their petition to compel documents from a lien claimant. The Board found that the defendant failed to demonstrate they exhausted discovery methods or attempted informal resolution before filing the compulsion petition. Compelling documents should be a last resort after other discovery avenues are exhausted. The defendant also failed to show significant prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied.

Petition for RemovalOrder Suspending ActionWCJlien claimantEncino Care PharmacyPetition to Compel Servicelien conferencediscovery processformal discovery methodssignificant prejudice
References
Case No. ADJ4167440 (SBR 0304112)
Regular
Dec 29, 2008

ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ vs. AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of an order compelling discovery, deeming it interlocutory. However, they granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinded the discovery order, and returned the case to the trial level. The Board found the original discovery requests for chemicals, MSDS, employee names, and machinery to be vague, overbroad, and improperly sought the compilation of information rather than existing records.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Compelling Requested InformationSubpoena Duces TecumMSDSIndustrial InjuryCumulative ExposureChemicalsSolvents
References
Case No. ADJ1415058 (FRE 0192009) MF ADJ4686427 (FRE 0193449)
Regular
Dec 18, 2017

ANGEL VALENZUELA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

The defendant employer sought removal to challenge an order compelling the deposition of their claims adjuster and production of documents. The defendant argued that as a legally uninsured employer, discovery from their adjuster (SCIF/SCS) required subpoenas, not just notice. The Appeals Board denied removal, holding that workers' compensation proceedings are not bound by civil discovery rules and the adjuster, as the employer's agent, is subject to discovery via notice. The Board found no irreparable prejudice and affirmed the WCJ's order compelling discovery.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalAdministrative Law JudgeMotion to Compel DepositionProduction of DocumentsState Compensation Insurance FundLegally Uninsured EmployerSubpoenaService of NoticeLabor Code
References
Case No. ADJ18376723
Regular
Oct 09, 2025

Miguel Mejinez vs. Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, State Compensation Insurance Fund

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal regarding an order that rescinded a prior directive for the applicant to disclose medical history under Labor Code section 4663(d). The defendant argued that section 4663(d) compels disclosure upon request and that they suffered prejudice from the applicant's refusal. However, the Board, concurring with the WCJ's recommendation, found that while section 4663 broadened the scope of discovery, it did not expand the methods of compelled discovery, which are limited to oral testimony and records under Labor Code section 5708. Consequently, the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm necessary for removal, concluding that written interrogatories are not an appropriate method for compelled discovery in workers' compensation cases.

Petition for RemovalOrder Rescinding OrderMedical History DisclosureLabor Code Section 4663(d)Previous Permanent DisabilitiesPhysical ImpairmentsSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmReconsideration Adequate RemedyWritten Interrogatories
References
Case No. ADJ8517731
Regular
Jul 23, 2013

BLANCA CALDERON vs. CPS SECURITY SOLUTIONS

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's denial of a medical records release form because the defendant conceded they had not yet been prejudiced and had received records via subpoena. The Board also found the defendant's discovery requests regarding a prior sexual harassment lawsuit too vague to compel and noted that specific facts demonstrating good cause under Labor Code section 3208.4 would be required for discovery related to sexual conduct. The case was remanded for a priority conference, where the defendant must present a comprehensive discovery plan, and the WCJ will issue appropriate discovery orders.

Petition for RemovalRelease of Medical RecordsLabor Code section 3208.4Sexual Harassment LitigationDiscoveryMandatory Settlement ConferencePriority ConferenceWCJAppeals BoardIrreparable Harm
References
Case No. ADJ7848295
Regular
Apr 10, 2012

RAMONA BURTON vs. LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted removal and dismissed reconsideration of a WCJ's order. The WCJ had improperly taken the case off calendar and allowed discovery to reopen for a new psychiatric injury claim, despite the applicant filing a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed indicating trial readiness. This prejudiced the defendant by allowing the applicant to develop evidence for an unclaimed injury after discovery closure. The Board ordered discovery closed as of the original Mandatory Settlement Conference date and returned the case to trial level for a new MSC to prepare for trial.

Petition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedInjury to PsychePanel Qualified Medical EvaluatorPermanent and Stationary StatusReopened DiscoveryClosure of DiscoveryInterlocutory Orders
References
Case No. ADJ9060378
Regular
Apr 21, 2014

MELISSA OVERTON vs. THE PAPER BAG PRINCESS, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a dispute over applicant Melissa Overton's deposition, specifically regarding the presence of an employer representative and videotaping. A WCJ vacated a prior submission order to compel a psychiatric evaluation to assess the applicant's fitness for deposition under those conditions. The defendant sought removal, arguing the WCJ erred in vacating submission and ordering further discovery. The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the WCJ's order and submission order, and returned the case for reassignment to a new WCJ to resolve the discovery dispute.

Petition for RemovalOrder Vacating SubmissionFurther DiscoveryProtective OrdersDeposition LocationEmployer RepresentativePsychiatric EvaluationIndustrial InjuryCumulative TraumaWCJ Reassignment
References
Case No. ADJ7247116 ADJ7241415 ADJ7407598 ADJ9052220 ADJ9432209
Regular
Feb 12, 2015

DOROTHY TRISTAN vs. CITY OF FRESNO, AMERICAN ALL-RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for removal regarding a discovery order. The employer argued that releasing documents related to a prior DFEH/EEOC discrimination claim and allowing a continued deposition would cause irreparable harm due to privilege concerns. The Board found the employer failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, emphasizing that privilege objections can still be raised for specific documents. The Board also noted the prolonged discovery dispute and encouraged expeditious resolution of the underlying workers' compensation claims.

Petition for RemovalMotion to QuashDepositionDocument ProductionPrivileged RecordsDFEHEEOCLabor Code Section 132aDiscovery DisputeMandatory Settlement Conference
References
Showing 1-10 of 1,281 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational