CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ2212288
Regular
Mar 09, 2011

GUILLERMO GOMEZ vs. BRINDERSON CONSTRUCTORS, INC., TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves lien claimants seeking reconsideration of an order dismissing their lien claims. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petitions for reconsideration because the case file lacked proof of service for the notice of the lien trial. The Board has ordered the defendant to provide proof of service within 15 days. This action is intended to allow for a proper review of the facts and law regarding the dismissed liens.

Lien Claim DismissalPetition for ReconsiderationProof of ServiceMinutes of HearingLien TrialWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJBrinderson ConstructorsTravelers InsuranceWestside Health-Chiropractic
References
0
Case No. 192-1049-352
Regular Panel Decision

Goodman v. Mr. Goodbuys of New York Corp. (In Re Mr. Goodbuys of New York Corp.)

Howard P. Goodman, a former Chief Financial Officer for Mr. Goodbuys of New York Corp., Inc., filed an adversary proceeding seeking severance pay and damages under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) and to recover under his Proof of Claim No. 833. The Debtors-Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint and expunge the claim. The court found that Goodman was terminated on September 27, 1991, which was more than 90 days prior to the mass layoffs at Mr. Goodbuys in January/February 1992. Therefore, Goodman did not qualify as an "affected employee" under WARN, and his pleadings failed to state a claim for relief. Consequently, the court granted the Debtors-Defendants' motion, dismissing Goodman's complaint with prejudice and expunging his Proof of Claim No. 833.

BankruptcyMotion to DismissWARN ActEmployment TerminationSeverance PayProof of ClaimAdversary ProceedingChapter 11Pro Se LitigantMass Layoff
References
29
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In Re St. James Mechanical, Inc.

ITT Sheraton Corporation (ITT) moved to extend its time to file a proof of claim or to have the notice of appointment of the Creditors Committee deemed an informal claim in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of St. James Mechanical, Inc. (the Debtor). The Court denied both aspects of ITT's motion. The Court ruled that ITT no longer possessed a pre-petition claim against the Debtor because it was discharged upon the confirmation of the reorganization plan, thus making Rule 9006(b) for extending claim filing time inapplicable. Additionally, the Court found that the Notice of Appointment did not constitute a valid informal proof of claim as it was not filed by ITT and lacked sufficient intent. However, the Court determined that despite ITT's failure to file a timely claim, it is still entitled to the treatment outlined in the confirmed plan, as the plan's provisions are binding on all parties, acting as res judicata, even if they contained legal errors in ITT's inclusion.

BankruptcyChapter 11Proof of ClaimExcusable NeglectPlan ConfirmationDischargeDue ProcessRes JudicataInformal ClaimCreditors Committee
References
33
Case No. ADJ9920215
Regular
Dec 12, 2017

ALICIA OLMOS vs. JM CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision denies the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, finding the applicant failed to prove causation for her claimed industrial injury by a preponderance of the evidence. Although the WCAB can amend pleadings to conform to proof, the applicant still bears the burden of proof. Additionally, the applicant's attorney was admonished for citing evidence not admitted into the record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeAmendment of PleadingsBurden of ProofIndustrial InjuryCausationEvidence AdmittedAppeals Board Rule 10842(c)Advocacy Letter
References
0
Case No. Proof of Claim No. 149
Regular Panel Decision

In re DeWitt Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, Inc.

The Debtor, DeWitt Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, Inc., moved to expunge the priority portion of a claim filed by United Staffing Registry, Inc. The Claimant sought priority status for social security, Medicare, and unemployment payments made for temporary employees it provided, citing 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(5). Bankruptcy Judge Allan L. Gropper analyzed the application of § 507(a)(5) in light of case precedents, including Howard Delivery Service, Inc. The Court determined that the priority under § 507(a)(5) is intended to protect contributions for a debtor's direct employees, and the temporary employees were not employees of DeWitt. Consequently, the Debtor's objection was sustained, disallowing the priority and reclassifying the entire claim as a general unsecured claim, while also denying the Debtor's request for legal fees.

Bankruptcy LawPriority ClaimsEmployee Benefit Plans11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(5)Temporary EmployeesUnsecured ClaimsIndemnificationLegal FeesClaim ExpungementStatutory Interpretation
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In Re Seatrain Lines, Inc.

Seatrain Lines, Inc., operating as a debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11, objected to a proof of claim filed by the BSA-ILA Pension Trust Fund. The Pension Fund sought $323,163.00 in withdrawal liability, asserting Seatrain was an 'employer' under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 due to its prior engagement of stevedores for longshoremen services. Seatrain argued it was not an employer because the longshoremen were hired, paid, and controlled by independent stevedores, not Seatrain directly. The court examined common law indicia of employment and congressional intent behind the Multiemployer Act. It concluded that Seatrain was neither a common law employer nor an employer under the Multiemployer Act, and thus had no withdrawal liability. The Pension Fund's claim was consequently ordered expunged.

BankruptcyMultiemployer Pension PlanWithdrawal LiabilityEmployer-Employee RelationshipIndependent ContractorLongshoremenERISAChapter 11Proof of ClaimClaim Objection
References
3
Case No. ADJ9173159
Regular
Dec 09, 2016

GARY COTTLE vs. TONY'S EXPRESS, CALIFORNIA TRUCKERS' SAFETY ASSOCIATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a prior administrative law judge's (WCJ) order. This order addressed penalties for unreasonable delay in payment and sanctions for bad faith litigation. Crucially, the WCAB has not received a petition for reconsideration from defendant CTSA and requires them to submit a copy of their petition and proof of timely filing within 20 days. Failure to comply will result in the WCAB proceeding with only the applicant's petition.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 5814Unreasonable DelayCompensation PaymentLabor Code Section 5813Bad Faith LitigationLienTimely FiledProof of Service
References
0
Case No. POM 0277883
Regular
Mar 17, 2008

YOLANDA LOPEZ vs. MARK C. DEARTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURAND FUND

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's claim of cumulative trauma injury could be amended to conform to proof, as evidenced by a QME report. The Board determined substantial evidence supports an industrial cumulative trauma injury of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, but other claimed injuries require further development of the record. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision on all outstanding issues.

Cumulative traumaspecific injuryworkers compensationindustrial injurybilateral carpal tunnel syndromeupper extremitieslower extremitieslow backWCJWCAB
References
4
Case No. ADJ11029299 ADJ10664592
Regular
May 03, 2018

KATHLEEN CAMPER vs. VAL VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PSI, administered by KEENAN \u0026 ASSOCIATES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's initial timely filed claim for cumulative trauma injury should be amended to conform to proof of a specific back injury on May 5, 2016. The Board rescinded the judge's order finding the applicant took nothing and instead ordered the dismissal of the defendant's later-filed specific injury claim. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the amended claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderAdministrative Law JudgeCustodianCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryApplication for Adjudication of ClaimDue ProcessQualified Medical Examiner
References
0
Case No. ADJ11326733
Regular
Dec 08, 2020

JOSE NUNO vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original decision, which had denied the applicant's claim for a cumulative psychiatric injury. The applicant argued the original finding should be amended to reflect a specific psychiatric injury on March 18, 2018, supported by medical evidence. The Board found the WCJ had discretion to amend the pleadings to conform to proof, but that further proceedings were necessary to fully consider the record and allow parties an opportunity to be heard. The matter was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision.

Psychiatric injuryAOE/COEPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderQualified Medical ExaminerAdjustment DisorderCumulative injurySpecific injuryStipulationsAmend pleadings
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 1,395 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational