Claim of Nardo v. Rheinstein Construction Co.
The claimant, an electrician, developed Dupuytren's Contracture after years of work involving pressure on his hands. The Workmen's Compensation Board awarded him compensation, finding the disease to be occupational. Appellants argued that the disease's cause is unknown, it affects the general population, and the claimant had a constitutional defect predisposing him to it, thus preventing an award. The court rejected this rigid test, stating that medical opinion supported the finding that the claimant's work accelerated and adversely affected the disease. The court noted Dupuytren's Contracture has been frequently linked to repeated heavy hand use in occupations like brewery workers. The award was unanimously affirmed.