CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ4278917 (VNO 0546068) ADJ4125934 (VNO 0546069) ADJ4427925 (VNO 0546070)
Regular
Feb 26, 2009

DEANNA MURRAY vs. INTUIT, INC, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an administrative law judge's order dated December 8, 2008. This decision was made due to the need for further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. The WCAB will conduct further proceedings as deemed appropriate. All future correspondence should be directed to the WCAB's Reconsideration unit.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionDecision After ReconsiderationWritten correspondenceObjectionsMotions
References
Case No. ADJ1916680 (SJO 0260827)
Regular
Oct 27, 2009

JEREMY GUNDERSON vs. AIRPORT HOME APPLIANCE, MIDCENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

The Appeals Board reversed the WCJ's award of SIF benefits, finding insufficient evidence that the applicant met the requirements of Labor Code section 4751. The subsequent injury was to the low back, not the opposite corresponding lower extremity, and there was no substantial evidence of pre-existing disability.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundLabor Code section 4751opposite and corresponding memberpermanent disabilityAgreed Medical ExaminerorthopedicpsychiatricAMA Guidespermanent disability rating scheduleradiculopathy
References
Case No. ADJ15370512
Regular
Mar 10, 2025

Antonio Luna Alvarez vs. Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund

The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) petitioned for reconsideration of a December 10, 2024 Amended Findings and Award, arguing that applicant Antonio Luna Alvarez did not meet the SIBTF eligibility threshold. SIBTF contended that the applicant's subsequent lumbar injury did not affect the opposite and corresponding member of his preexisting coronary artery disability, his preexisting disabilities were not labor disabling, and Dr. Suresh Mahawar's medical reports lacked substantial evidence. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the SIBTF's petition for reconsideration, deferring a final decision for further review of the merits and the entire record.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundSIBTFpermanent partial disabilityopposite and corresponding memberlabor disablingsubstantial medical evidencePetition for ReconsiderationActivities of Daily LivingADLscardiovascular disease
References
Case No. ADJ2697898
Regular
Mar 06, 2013

ROBERT WALKER vs. SISKIYOU FOREST PRODUCTS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, THE SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFIT TRUST FUND

This case involves a Subsequent Injuries Benefit Trust Fund (SIBTF) claim where the applicant sustained industrial injuries to his left knee and right ankle, resulting in incontinence. The Board affirmed the finding of 41% permanent disability for the subsequent injury, finding the applicant eligible for SIBTF benefits under Labor Code § 4751(a) due to corresponding prior and subsequent injuries to opposite limbs. The Board amended the award to specify that the attorney's fee of 15% is calculated on the SIBTF weekly payments, not commuted as a lump sum upfront, to comply with statutory prohibitions. The Court also addressed apportionment, pre-existing disability, and the unreliability of stipulated percentages when SIBTF was not a party.

Subsequent Injuries Benefit Trust FundPermanent DisabilityApportionmentLabor Code Section 4751Industrial InjuryPre-existing DisabilityLabor-DisablingOpposite and Corresponding MemberCommutation of BenefitsVocational Expert
References
Case No. ADJ7832100
Regular
Jan 09, 2017

William Reid vs. Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund

This case involves a Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) claim where the applicant, William Reid, sought benefits due to a cumulative injury to his feet and back. The SIBTF petitioned for reconsideration, arguing the applicant's subsequent injury alone did not meet the statutory threshold for benefits and that prior impairments were asymptomatic or improperly assessed. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report. The WCJ found the applicant met the 5% opposite and corresponding impairment threshold with a combined permanent disability rating of 10% from his feet and back, and that pre-existing conditions like hypertension and gout qualified as disabling impairments. Ultimately, the WCJ concluded the applicant was rendered totally permanently disabled, establishing SIBTF liability.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundLabor Code section 4751opposite and corresponding thresholdpermanent disabilitycumulative traumaasymptomatic impairmentvocational rehabilitation consultantOrthopedic AMEDr. DevorDr. Panting
References
Case No. ADJ4677964 (LAO 0868239)
Regular
Jun 07, 2012

Eugene Gilmore vs. Autoland Resale Center, State Compensation Insurance Fund

In *Gilmore v. Autoland Resale Center*, the applicant sought reconsideration of a March 12, 2012, Findings and Award. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration based on statutory time constraints and an initial review indicating a need for further study of the factual and legal issues. The WCAB determined this was necessary to ensure a complete understanding of the record and to issue a just decision. All future communications must be filed in writing with the WCAB Commissioners' office, not with any district office or via e-filing.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionFurther proceedingsPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationCorrespondence
References
Case No. ADJ7790883
Regular
Nov 01, 2012

MACARIO JAIMES vs. FS PRECISION TECH, TRAVELERS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PACIFIC COMPENSATION, HOME ASSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to obtain a hearing transcript and allow the defendant, Travelers Insurance, to submit correspondence. This correspondence, including a representation letter from applicant's attorney, is relevant to the presumed compensability of the applicant's industrial injury claim under Labor Code section 5402. The Board now intends to admit these documents into evidence unless a written objection with good cause is filed within 10 days. All future communications regarding this case must be submitted in writing to the Board's Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMacario JaimesFS Precision TechTravelersState Compensation Insurance FundPacific CompensationHome AssuranceChartisLabor Code section 5402presumption of compensability
References
Case No. ADJ262420 (ANA 0302091)
Regular
Nov 23, 2009

ROBERT ORNELAS vs. SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Permissibly Self-Insured

The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the August 24, 2009 Findings and Order, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The defendant had a contractual obligation to pay the lien claimant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderAdministrative Law JudgeLabor Code sections 4903 and 4903.1(a)(3)Compromise and ReleaseLiving ExpensesContractual ObligationBad Faith
References
Case No. ADJ1045902 (SFO 0500285) ADJ3255721 (SFO 0500284)
Regular
Dec 21, 2012

RONALD S. VERNA vs. CITY OF LOS ALTOS POLICE DEPARTMENT

This case concerns an award of additional attorney's fees to applicant's counsel, as mandated by Labor Code § 5801 after a successful writ of review. The Court of Appeal had remanded the matter for this specific purpose. The Board reviewed the submitted time and hourly rate, disallowing certain hours for clerical work, media communication, and duplicate entries. Ultimately, the Board awarded $9,080.00 in appellate attorney's fees to applicant's counsel.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewSupplemental AwardAttorney's FeesLabor Code § 5801Certified SpecialistClerical TimeMedia CorrespondenceDuplicated EntriesAppellate Attorney's Fee
References
Case No. ADJ3891982 (LAO 0855558)
Regular
Nov 20, 2015

DARRELL MOORE vs. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LOS ANGELES, YORK VALENCIA

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed in a workers' compensation matter. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition because it was untimely, having been filed more than 25 days after the administrative law judge's decision. The WCAB emphasized that filing is determined by receipt, not mailing date, and this jurisdictional deadline means they cannot consider untimely petitions. Supplemental filings were also rejected for failing to comply with procedural rules.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingJurisdictional Time LimitService by MailWCJ DecisionCode of RegulationsSupplemental CorrespondenceDismissal OrderCase Number
References
Showing 1-10 of 117 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational