CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

People v. Linzy

The case involves an appeal against a conviction for rape in the first degree, focusing on the sufficiency of corroborating evidence and the adequacy of jury instructions. The appellant contended that the complainant's testimony lacked sufficient corroboration of identity and that the trial court erred in its charge regarding exhibits as corroboration. The majority affirmed the conviction, finding ample corroboration from the complainant's observations and identification, supported by physical evidence. However, the dissenting judges argued that the corroborative evidence was weak and the confusing jury charge on corroboration led to a speculative verdict, necessitating a new trial.

Rape (First Degree)CorroborationJury InstructionsCriminal AppealWitness IdentificationPhysical EvidencePenal LawDue ProcessAppellate ReviewTrial Court Error
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Nicole S.

This neglect proceeding under Article 10 of the Family Court Act addresses the corroboration required for a child’s unsworn, out-of-court statements. The petitioner alleged respondent Steven S. physically injured his four-year-old child, presenting evidence solely through caseworkers' testimony recounting the child's statements and observations of injuries. The court found that while independent evidence confirmed injuries, there was no corroboration regarding the perpetrator's identity or the manner of injury, independent of the child’s hearsay statements. Applying the corroboration standard from criminal and juvenile delinquency cases, which mandates corroboration for all material elements, the court determined the petitioner failed to satisfy this burden. Consequently, the petition against Steven S. was dismissed.

Child NeglectFamily Court ActCorroboration RequirementUnsworn Child StatementHearsay ExceptionPhysical InjuryAbuse or Neglect ProceedingSufficiency of EvidenceDue Process ConsiderationsCriminal Procedure Law Standards
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Nicole G.

The Rockland County Department of Social Services appealed two Family Court orders concerning child protective proceedings against Nicole G. and Daniella G., which had denied petitions and dismissed the proceedings. The appeal affirmed the Family Court's decision, finding that Nicole G.'s out-of-court statements regarding her father's alleged abuse were insufficiently corroborated by other evidence. Although witnesses cross-corroborated each other's testimony and Nicole G. provided a narrative, she refused to testify. An expert witness also failed to provide the necessary corroborating evidence with a reasonable degree of certainty. Consequently, the allegations of abuse were not established by a preponderance of the evidence.

Child Protective ProceedingsFamily Court Act Article 10Child AbuseChild NeglectCorroboration of StatementsOut-of-Court StatementsCredibility of WitnessesFact-Finding HearingAdmissibility of EvidenceExpert Testimony
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Evan Y.

The Family Court of Tioga County found a child, born in 1994, to be abused by his father (respondent) based on the child's out-of-court statements of being repeatedly fondled and exhibited troubling behaviors such as sexual acting out, nightmares, bed-wetting, and suicidal tendencies. Petitioner initiated this child abuse proceeding, and the respondent, who had a prior neglect adjudication, chose not to testify at the fact-finding hearing. Expert witnesses, clinical social workers Mary Bado and Sarah Walsh, provided corroborating testimony that the child's behaviors were consistent with sexual abuse. Family Court credited this expert testimony and found sufficient corroboration for the child's statements. The respondent appealed the finding of sexual abuse, but the appellate court affirmed the Family Court's order, noting the permissible inference against the non-testifying respondent and the ample corroborative evidence from the expert witnesses.

child abusesexual abuseFamily Court Act Article 10corroborationexpert testimonyout-of-court statementschild witnessesappellate reviewparental rightssexual acting out
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 16, 1982

People v. Nieto

This case involves an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, convicting him of robbery in the second degree. The core issue on appeal was whether the People presented sufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of two accomplices, Anastasio Santiago and Julio Perez, who planned and executed the robbery with the defendant. The defendant allegedly informed the accomplices about the victim's valuable jewelry and suggested a time for the robbery. The court found that the evidence relied upon by the People, including the defendant's presence at the job site, association with accomplices, a statement about the robbery time, the victim's phone call testimony, and a police detective's rebuttal testimony, did not satisfy the statutory requirements for independent corroboration under CPL 60.22. The corroborative evidence, at best, only supported the accomplices' credibility but failed to connect the defendant with the crime. Consequently, the judgment was reversed, and the indictment was dismissed.

Accomplice TestimonyCorroboration EvidenceRobbery Second DegreeSufficiency of EvidenceIndictment DismissedAppellate ReviewCriminal Procedure LawImpeachment EvidenceIndependent CorroborationWitness Credibility
References
12
Case No. No. 1, No. 2
Regular Panel Decision

In re Jessica DD.

This case involves appeals from two Family Court orders. In the first proceeding (No. 1), the Family Court found that the stepfather sexually abused his stepdaughter. In the second proceeding (No. 2), it found the mother neglected her daughter. The primary issue on appeal was whether the four-year-old victim's out-of-court statements were sufficiently corroborated as required by Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (vi). The appellate court found that a licensed clinical social worker, Rosalyn Syp, provided ample corroboration for the sexual abuse finding through doll reenactment and observed behavioral patterns in the victim. Consequently, the Family Court's finding of sexual abuse against the stepfather was affirmed. However, the appellate court determined there was insufficient corroboration for the neglect finding against the mother, as no correlation was established between the victim's statements to her mother and the stepfather's departures. Therefore, the neglect finding against the mother was reversed and the petition dismissed.

Child AbuseChild NeglectSexual AbuseFamily Court Act Article 10Out-of-Court StatementsCorroborationExpert TestimonyLicensed Clinical Social WorkerDoll ReenactmentBehavioral Patterns
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

People v. Graham

Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, stemming from incidents at the Albany County Airport on March 8, 1984. The complainant alleged that after meeting the defendant for a drug transaction, he raped and sodomized her at knifepoint in his car, with his brother-in-law present. She initially provided false details to police to conceal her intent to purchase drugs but later corrected her statement, which was corroborated by the brother-in-law who received immunity. The defendant denied any involvement, claiming only a casual acquaintance. On appeal, the defendant challenged the trial court's refusal to provide the complainant's psychiatric history, alleged insufficient corroboration for the accomplice's testimony, claimed denial of exculpatory material, cited juror misconduct, and argued against the admission of certain witness testimony. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no abuse of discretion regarding the psychiatric records, sufficient corroboration, that any exculpatory evidence would not have altered the verdict, and that the trial court correctly denied a mistrial. Additionally, the court found the admission of certain testimony to be harmless error and upheld the consecutive sentences of 12.5 to 25 years given the heinous nature of the crimes and the defendant's extensive criminal record.

Rape First DegreeSodomy First DegreeAlbany County Airport IncidentWitness CredibilityPsychiatric HistoryAccomplice TestimonyCorroboration CPL 60.22Brady ViolationExculpatory MaterialJuror Misconduct
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Kattressa S.

The Family Court's decision was affirmed on appeal. The court found that unsworn, out-of-court statements made by the victim were sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of a pediatrician and a clinical social worker. This corroboration established that the victim suffered from child sexual abuse syndrome. The appellate court cited Matter of Nicole V. and Matter of Linda K. as precedents for its decision.

Child AbuseSexual Abuse SyndromeCorroboration of StatementsOut-of-Court TestimonyPediatric TestimonySocial Worker ValidationFamily Court DecisionAppellate ReviewAffirmed OrderEvidence Standards
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Kathleen Anne P. v. Frederick George M.

The respondent appealed a Family Court order of filiation, which declared him the father of the petitioner's child, born on April 12, 1967. The petitioner testified about a sexual encounter on July 8, 1966, but her account of menstrual regularity was inconsistent and lacked corroboration. Conversely, the respondent's alibi for the night in question was corroborated by his wife. The court ultimately concluded that the evidence presented was not sufficiently clear, convincing, and satisfactory to uphold the order of filiation. Consequently, the order was reversed and the petition dismissed.

PaternityFiliationSexual IntercourseCorroborationUncorroborated TestimonyAlibi DefenseFamily CourtAppellate ReviewEvidence InsufficiencyChild Born Out of Wedlock
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Jamie EE.

Petitioner appealed the dismissal of an application to adjudicate Jamie EE. and her brothers as abused and neglected children by respondent. The Family Court dismissed the case for lack of corroboration of the child's out-of-court statements and denied the Law Guardian's request for an in camera interview with the child. The Appellate Division reversed the Family Court's order, holding that an in camera interview could provide the necessary corroboration for the child's statements and should have been allowed. The matter was remitted to Family Court to conduct the interview and receive additional relevant evidence from the Law Guardian.

Child AbuseChild NeglectCorroboration of Child StatementsHearsay EvidenceIn Camera TestimonyFamily Court ActAppellate ReversalRemandLaw Guardian RoleChild Welfare Proceedings
References
9
Showing 1-10 of 265 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational