CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ10806223
Regular
Sep 17, 2019

ISRAEL RAMOS vs. THE CRÈME SHOP, INC., EMPLOYERS PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision. The ALJ found the applicant's testimony regarding an industrial injury in 2015 to be not credible due to significant inconsistencies. These inconsistencies were contradicted by medical reports from subsequent treatment and the applicant's own statements to physicians. Additionally, the Board affirmed that the Statute of Limitations barred the claim, as there was insufficient evidence of timely reporting or provision of medical treatment by the employer.

AOE/COEPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ credibilityunrebutted testimonyStatute of Limitationsmedical reportingcontemporaneous evidenceapplicant testimonycredibility determinationemployer awareness
References
Case No. ADJ6688237
Regular
Jun 10, 2013

Celina Acevedo vs. William Sanchez-Barrera, UEF

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that found applicant Celina Acevedo was not an employee of William Sanchez-Barrera. The Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) credibility finding against the applicant was central to the decision. The ALJ found the applicant's testimony regarding her employment and the severity of her claimed injury lacked credibility, while the defense witness's testimony was deemed credible. Therefore, the board adopted the ALJ's report and recommendations.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ ReportCredibility FindingEmployment RelationshipHousekeeperInjury AOE/COEWitness TestimonyEmployment RecordsApplicant Credibility
References
Case No. ADJ195830
Regular
Nov 10, 2008

BELLA MEDRANO vs. STREETWISE FOOTWEAR CORPORATION dba LEATHER BY SHAWN, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the applicant's claim for injury. The WCJ found the applicant not credible, noting inconsistencies in her testimony, delayed treatment, and medical findings that did not substantially support her claimed specific injury. The employer credibly testified that the applicant never reported an injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardStreetwise Footwear CorporationUninsured Employers Benefits Trust FundPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportGarza v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.credibility findingradiculopathyMRIEMG
References
Case No. ADJ3005224 (STK 0185309)
Regular
Jul 02, 2010

MARIO GONZALEZ vs. STANLEY VANDERVEEN/VMV HULLING LLC, et al.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's petition. The applicant sought to establish employment with various entities or individuals after sustaining injuries from falling off a tractor. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony to be not credible and lacked substantial evidence of employment. The judge found the testimony of Stanley Vanderveen and David Corona to be more credible.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDeniedWCJ ReportGarza v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.Applicant CredibilityEmployment StatusSubcontractorIndependent ContractorVMV Hulling LLC
References
Case No. ADJ3713000
Regular
Oct 29, 2013

ROXI ROMO vs. BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SELF-INSURED SCHOOLS OF CALIFORNIA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decision was based on the applicant's credible testimony and initial medical reports documenting injuries consistent with her account. The defendant's arguments, focusing on a security video and other circumstantial evidence, were found unpersuasive by the WCJ. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing that credibility determinations are given great weight and are supported by substantial evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation JudgeCourse and Scope of EmploymentAOE/COEInjuryApplicant CredibilityMedical ReportsDefendant ContentionsSacral Contusion
References
Case No. ADJ3210598 (SAC 0322261)
Regular
Dec 24, 2010

JOAN NEWLANDS vs. MARRIOTT VACATION INTERNATIONAL, dba TIMBER LODGE & GRAND RESIDENCES CLUB

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error, amending the original finding to state the applicant was not temporarily totally disabled since January 7, 2005, rather than January 1, 2005. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's decision, which was based on the applicant's poor credibility and conflicting medical evidence regarding her alleged condition. The judge's findings, particularly regarding credibility, were accorded great weight and supported by substantial evidence. The applicant's industrial injury to both upper extremities was admitted.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMarriott Vacation InternationalTimber LodgeGrand Residences ClubPermissibly Self-InsuredApplicantDefendantIndustrial InjuryUpper ExtremitiesElbows
References
Case No. FRE 236537
Regular
Jul 25, 2007

CLOUDY LORAN-GRANT vs. JIM CRAWFORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding applicant's right knee injury AOE/COE. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony credible and noted inconsistencies in defense witnesses' statements. The judge concluded that while medical evidence was not conclusive, the applicant's candid and honest presentation, coupled with contradictory defense testimony, supported the finding of industrial injury.

AOE/COEReconsideration DeniedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardJudge's ReportCredibility FindingPreponderance of EvidenceInjury OnsetMedical EvidenceDefense Witnesses InconsistenciesApplicant Credibility
References
Showing 1-10 of 10,827 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational