CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Holcomb v. Daily News

This case involves an appeal by the Daily News regarding a Workmen's Compensation Board award of death benefits to the widow of John Holcomb. Holcomb, an employee of the Daily News, sustained fatal injuries after falling from a company delivery truck while being transported to work by a fellow employee. The appellants argued that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of employment, as the employer was not contractually obligated to provide transportation. However, the Board found, and the Appellate Division affirmed, that a common and regular practice of employees transporting each other to work, knowingly acquiesced to by the employer for its own benefit, constituted an implicit assumption of responsibility for transportation-related risks. The court held that a frequent and regular practice of providing transportation, even if not contractually obligated, can render such transportation incidental to employment, making resulting injuries compensable.

Fatal AccidentTransportation to WorkEmployer AcquiescenceCommon PracticeCourse of EmploymentDeath BenefitsWorkers' CompensationImplied ContractGratuitous TransportationRisk Responsibility
References
11
Case No. 08-15-00383-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 14, 2018

Heriberto Salas, Individually and D/B/A Iceland Refrigeration v. Total Air Services, LLC

This case involves an appeal concerning an employee's breach of fiduciary duty to an employer by operating a competing business while still employed. Heriberto Salas, working for Total Air Services, LLC, founded and ran Iceland Refrigeration, actively soliciting and securing projects that sometimes directly competed with Total Air. A jury found Salas liable for breach of fiduciary duty and awarded lost profits. The Court of Appeals affirmed the finding of liability, stating Salas owed a fiduciary duty due to his managerial role and competitive actions. However, the court found the evidence for some claimed lost profits insufficient and suggested a remittitur of $15,260.47. If the remittitur is accepted, the judgment will be modified and affirmed; otherwise, the case will be remanded for a new trial.

Employee BreachFiduciary DutyCompetitionEmployer-Employee RelationshipLost ProfitsRemittiturAt-Will EmployeeBusiness OpportunitiesTexas Court of AppealsJudicial Review
References
40
Case No. 11-24-00054-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 12, 2026

Lone Star Well Service LLC v. RMTDC Operations D/B/A Total Energy Services, LLC and Daniel Ramirez

This appeal concerns the application of the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act (TOAIA) to an oilfield indemnity agreement. Lone Star Well Service LLC appealed a judgment that obligated it to defend and indemnify RMTDC Operations d/b/a Total Energy Services, LLC and Daniel Ramirez. The appellate court affirmed that Total and Ramirez are third-party beneficiaries to Lone Star's Master Services Agreement with Parsley Energy Operations, LLC, and thus are covered by the mutual, insurance-backed indemnity obligations. However, the court reversed the judgment in part, remanding the case to the trial court to determine the specific amount and limitation of Lone Star's indemnity obligation.

Oilfield Anti-Indemnity ActIndemnity AgreementThird-Party BeneficiaryContractual InterpretationMutual Indemnity ObligationInsurance CoverageAppellate ReviewDeclaratory JudgmentAttorney's FeesRipeness Doctrine
References
47
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Brennan v. Bally Total Fitness

Kathryn Brennan filed a civil rights action against her former employer, Bally Total Fitness Corp., alleging sexual harassment under Title VII and disability discrimination under the ADA. Bally moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely and to compel arbitration based on its Employee Dispute Resolution Procedure (EDRP). The court denied Bally's motion to dismiss the Title VII claim, applying the 'continuing-violation exception' due to Brennan's allegations of ongoing harassment. The court also denied Bally's motion to compel arbitration, finding Bally's unilateral modifications to the EDRP invalid and raising questions of unconscionability regarding the original EDRP. The case is remanded for jurisdictional discovery and a possible hearing to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement.

Civil RightsSexual HarassmentDisability DiscriminationTitle VIIAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA)Arbitration AgreementFederal Arbitration Act (FAA)Motion to DismissMotion to Compel ArbitrationContinuing Violation Exception
References
27
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Garcia v. Total Oilfield Services, Inc.

The appellants, comprising the surviving widow and minor children of Jose Alejo Garcia, appealed the trial court's dismissal of their cause of action against Total Oilfield Services, Inc. Jose Alejo Garcia died in an industrial accident in Oklahoma while employed by the appellee. The appellants sought exemplary damages under the Texas Constitution, having already received Oklahoma workers' compensation benefits. The trial court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but the appellate court reversed and remanded, finding that Texas courts had jurisdiction and that Texas law, allowing extraterritorial application of wrongful death actions, should apply despite Oklahoma's exclusive remedy provision. The court also determined that Texas had a superior governmental interest in the case, outweighing Oklahoma law under full faith and credit principles and the "most significant relationship" choice-of-law rule.

Workers' CompensationWrongful DeathExemplary DamagesConflict of LawsSubject Matter JurisdictionFull Faith and CreditTexas ConstitutionOklahoma LawExtraterritorial ApplicationElection of Remedies
References
14
Case No. 03-15-00348-CV
Regular Panel Decision

Todd Enright v. Asclepius Panacea, LLC Asclepius Panacea GP, LLC Daily Pharmacy, LLC Daily Pharmacy GP, LLC And Toth Enterprises II, P .A. D/B/A Victory Medical Center

Todd Enright appealed a district court's denial of his special appearance in a case brought by Asclepius Panacea, LLC et al. (VMC). The dispute originated from VMC's equity purchase of Texas pharmacies from QVL. Enright, acting for QVL, allegedly made fraudulent misrepresentations during negotiations concerning drug inventory and handling of insurance receipts. Post-acquisition, Enright reportedly controlled QVL's finances, directing payments and wrongfully withholding VMC's funds. VMC's claims against Enright include common law fraud, Texas Securities Act violations, tortious interference, conversion, money had and received, and a request for an accounting, asserting his actions establish sufficient minimum contacts with Texas for personal jurisdiction.

Personal JurisdictionFraudTexas Securities ActTortious InterferenceConversionEquitable AccountingSpecial AppearanceMinimum ContactsFiduciary Shield DoctrineAppellate Procedure
References
34
Case No. 2014-1712 K C
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 08, 2017

Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. Global Liberty Ins.

Daily Medical Equipment Distribution Center, Inc., as assignee of Juan Mendoza, appealed an order from the Civil Court concerning no-fault benefits. The Civil Court had held Global Liberty Insurance's motion for summary judgment in abeyance. This abeyance was pending a Workers' Compensation Board determination on Mendoza's eligibility for workers' compensation benefits. The Appellate Term dismissed the appeal, ruling that an order holding a motion in abeyance is not appealable as of right under CPLR 5701 (a) (2). Consequently, the court declined to grant leave to appeal, thus upholding the procedural decision to await the Workers' Compensation Board's findings.

No-Fault BenefitsWorkers' Compensation BoardAppeal DismissedSummary Judgment MotionAbeyanceAppellate ProcedureJurisdictionCivil Procedure Law and RulesFirst-Party BenefitsInsurance Law
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Steven L. Scherer, Michael Joseph Neal and Total Solutions, Inc. v. the Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association

The case concerns an appeal by Steven L. Scherer, Michael Joseph Neal, and Total Solutions, Inc. against the denial of attorney's fees from the Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association. Appellants sought reimbursement for fees incurred defending a copyright infringement suit, arguing their original insurer, International Underwriters Insurance Company (IUIC), failed its duty to defend. After IUIC was declared impaired, the Guaranty Association was added as a defendant. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, holding that the attorney's fees incurred before the insurer's impairment determination were explicitly excluded from "covered claims" under the Property and Casualty Guaranty Act, irrespective of the insurer's duty to defend. The court also noted the Act's $100,000 cap on claims, with an exception for workers' compensation which did not apply here.

Insurance DisputeAppellate LawAttorney Fee RecoveryStatutory ExclusionInsurer InsolvencyProperty and Casualty Guaranty ActDuty to DefendCopyright LitigationTexas LawSummary Judgment Appeal
References
2
Case No. 2018-03-0420
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 06, 2019

Blevins, Keith v. 2Morrow's Total Home Maintenance

This case involves Keith Adam Blevins, an employee, against Jason Aaron Morrow dba 2Morrow’s Total Home Maintenance, an uninsured employer, for a left ankle injury sustained on December 14, 2017. The employer asserted an intoxication and drug use defense. The Court found that Mr. Blevins met his burden, ruling there was no medical evidence that his hydrocodone use proximately caused the injury. The Court ordered Mr. Morrow to pay Mr. Blevins' past medical expenses totaling $46,253.02, provide ongoing medical treatment with Dr. Pesut, and pay temporary total disability benefits for twenty-seven weeks and four days at $135.20 per week, totaling $3,727.64.

Workers' CompensationAnkle FractureIntoxication DefenseDrug Use DefenseTemporary Total DisabilityMedical ExpensesAverage Weekly WageUninsured EmployerExpedited HearingProximate Cause
References
7
Case No. ADJ2800461 (VNO 0521396)
Regular
Dec 23, 2008

WON JAE LEE vs. HYOUNG KOOK LEE dba GLENDALE NEWS SERVICES, KOREAN CENTRAL DAILY NEWS, REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

This case involves a dispute over whether the applicant was an employee of Korean Central Daily News (Daily) or an independent contractor of Hyoung Kook Lee (HKL) when injured while delivering newspapers. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicant was an employee of Daily. The Board found that Daily exercised sufficient control over the applicant's work, including providing the newspapers, customers, and delivery instructions, despite HKL's role as a purported manager.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjuryNewspaper CarrierEmployee StatusIndependent Business OwnerAgencyControl of WorkEmployer LiabilityUninsured Employers Benefit Trust FundReconsideration Denied
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 2,589 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational