CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8321950
Regular
Apr 30, 2013

JACINTO CORNEJO vs. FOWLER PACKING CO., STAR INSURANCE CO.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petitions for removal and reconsideration. The Board upheld the finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury from dehydration, relying on the administrative law judge's credible assessment of the applicant's testimony regarding working conditions and reporting of the injury. The Board agreed that the applicant's testimony was sufficient to trigger a reasonable investigation by the employer, despite the defendant's claims about discovery closure and lack of notice.

Petition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationInjurious EventDehydrationAOE/COECredibilityMedical EvidenceDiscovery ClosedBurden of ProofReasonable Investigation
References
Case No. ADJ7392507
Regular
Aug 15, 2011

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ vs. EBERHARD ROOFING, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

Applicant seeks reconsideration of a prior decision finding only heat exhaustion and dehydration as his work injury, claiming the arbitrator overlooked back, neck, and leg injuries. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and remanded the case. This action is partly due to the applicant's former attorney's potential abandonment and the need for him to show good cause for withdrawal. The case will return to the arbitrator for further proceedings on the applicant's alleged orthopedic injuries.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and OrderHeat ExhaustionDehydrationBack InjuryNeck InjuryLeg InjuryMedical Provider Network (MPN)Orthopedic Injury
References
Case No. ADJ8063851, ADJ8061988
Regular
Dec 01, 2014

HASSAAN SALAAM, HASAAN SALAAM vs. TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INC., NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the original findings and award for applicant Hassaan Salaam. The defendants' petition argued insufficient evidence for certain injury findings and questioned the connection between dehydration and cumulative trauma. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the evidence supported the award, clarified distinct injury mechanisms, and noted a correctable clerical error in case numbers. Reconsideration was denied, with the case to be returned to the WCJ for correction of the clerical error.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeJoint Findings and AwardClerical ErrorDehydrationCumulative TraumaWelderMillwrightRepetitive Bending
References
Case No. ADJ9693769
Regular
Sep 26, 2022

AUGUSTO GARCIA vs. SIERRA TRAFFIC SERVICE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board reconsidered a decision and affirmed findings that the applicant sustained a heat stroke injury but not orthopedic injuries. The Board rescinded the award of temporary disability benefits, finding no substantial medical evidence supported disability resulting from the industrial injury. Consequently, the Employment Development Department is not entitled to reimbursement, and the lien of Spine and Ortho Center is disallowed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationTemporary DisabilitySubstantial Medical EvidenceOrthopedic InjuryHeat StrokeDehydrationExhaustionSleep DisorderEmployment Development Department
References
Case No. ADJ6561833
Regular
Aug 19, 2011

Stephen Resetar vs. CONSTRUCTORA AMORA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a worker, Stephen Resetar, who sustained a physical injury to his spine after falling from a ladder. Resetar also claimed a psychological injury, but had been employed for less than six months. Labor Code § 3208.3(d) generally bars compensation for psychiatric injuries in such cases unless caused by a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition." The Appeals Board found that Resetar's fall, caused by dizziness and falling from a ladder, did not qualify as a sudden and extraordinary event. Therefore, Resetar's claim for psychiatric injury is barred, and reconsideration is granted to reflect this decision.

Labor Code § 3208.3(d)psyche injurysudden and extraordinary employment conditionsix-month employment rulereconsiderrescindcompensable injuryfall from ladderdizzinessdehydration
References
Case No. FRE 0226319
Regular
Jan 14, 2008

JUAN GUILLEN vs. SENSIENT DEHYDRATED FLAVORS, CHUBB INSURANCE, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Juan Guillen's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely, as it was filed over five months after the deadline. Even if it had been timely, the petition would have been denied due to its skeletal nature, lacking any specific arguments or references to the record or law. The WCAB lacks jurisdiction to grant petitions filed outside the statutory timeframe.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awarduntimely petitionskeletal petitionjurisdictionalLabor Code section 5903Board Rule 10390Board Rule 10846tractor operatorindustrial injury
References
Showing 1-6 of 6 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational