CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. SJO 0237342
Regular

LINDA ONTIVEROS vs. SAVERS STORES, ZURICH AMERICA INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's original decision. The WCAB clarified its judicial authority and the role of WCJs in delegating those powers. Specifically, the Board ordered a correction to the heading of the WCJ's report to accurately reflect the "Workers' Compensation Appeals Board" as the decision-making body.

Petition for ReconsiderationDeniedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJJudicial AuthorityOriginal JurisdictionLab. CodeCal. Code RegsSan Jose District OfficeAdministrative Law Judge
References
Case No. ADJ9346293
En Banc
Apr 13, 2020

ANTHONY DENNIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION INMATE CLAIMS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The WCAB holds that Administrative Director Rule 10133.54 is invalid as it exceeds the statutory authority granted to the Administrative Director and restricts the WCAB's exclusive power to adjudicate compensation claims. It also holds that an employer must provide a bona fide offer of work to avoid liability for a supplemental job displacement benefit voucher.

AD Rule 10133.54Supplemental Job Displacement BenefitWCAB exclusive jurisdictionadministrative director authoritybona fide work offerinmate laborstatutory authorityadjudicatory poweren banc decisionreconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ6721899
Regular
Apr 04, 2014

RICARDO VILLAREAL MENDOZA vs. PUEBLO PACKING INC., BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, OAK RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Ricardo Villareal Mendoza's petition for removal. The petition argued that moving Mandatory Settlement Conferences (MSCs) from Santa Barbara to Oxnard caused irreparable harm due to travel burdens. The WCAB cited statutory authority and case law establishing its power to calendar hearings at different district offices based on available resources and space limitations. The Board also noted the availability of CourtCall and alternative arrangements for unrepresented workers to mitigate travel difficulties.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDivision of Workers' CompensationMandatory Settlement ConferenceVenueCourtCallIrreparable HarmJudicial PowersInherent PowersCalendar Control
References
Case No. ADJ4609174 (RDG 0041947)
Regular
Oct 27, 2010

DOYLE CANADA vs. REDDING POWER SAWMILL DIVISION, ESIS PORTLAND

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, Doyle Canada's petition for reconsideration was denied. The Board adopted the findings of the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge, whose report detailed the reasons for the denial. This order, dated October 27, 2010, upholds the original decision and denies further review. The defendants were Redding Power Sawmill Division and ESIS Portland.

WCABPetition for Reconsiderationworkers' compensation administrative law judgereport of the workers' compensation administrative law judgedeny reconsiderationADJ4609174Redding Power Sawmill DivisionESIS PortlandDoyle CanadaADJUDICATION
References
Case No. MON 0290566
Regular
Aug 12, 2008

MARTHA MANRIQUEZ vs. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER/DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's findings that the defendant unreasonably delayed paying a stipulated award, thus incurring penalties and attorney's fees. The Board affirmed the judge's decision to limit the defendant's credit for a third-party settlement to prospective benefits due to the defendant's inaction in pursuing its credit rights after the stipulated award. Furthermore, the Board ruled that the defendant could not apply its third-party credit against the penalties and attorney's fees awarded.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMartha ManriquezDepartment of Water and PowerLabor Code sections 4650(b)58145814.5Supplemental Findings and AwardPetition for Reconsiderationcumulative traumathird-party settlement
References
Case No. ADJ7490731
Regular
Aug 07, 2013

JORGE PEREZ vs. SAN GABRIEL INSULATION, CHARTIS

This case concerns lien claimants whose liens were dismissed with prejudice for failing to appear at a lien conference and not objecting within the prescribed ten days. The lien claimants sought reconsideration, arguing a clerical error caused their non-appearance and that service of the dismissal order was defective as delegated to the defendant. However, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was untimely filed, exceeding the 25-day statutory limit for reconsideration after service of the April 25, 2013 order. The Board found the order was properly considered a notice of intention, allowing delegation of service, and the lien claimants were properly charged with receipt of the dismissal.

Lien claimantsReconsiderationDismissalClerical errorService delegationWCAB Rule 10349Notice of intentionWCAB Rule 10500(a)Timely objectionCompromise and Release Agreement
References
Case No. LBO 0351747
Regular
Apr 02, 2008

SEAN QUINLIVAN vs. PETE'S PLUMBING, VIRGINIA SURETY C/O APPLIED RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that applied the 1997 permanent disability schedule to applicant Sean Quinlivan's injury. The Board found that the applicant's treating physician's report from November 2004, identifying the applicant as a Qualified Injured Worker, constituted evidence of permanent disability before January 1, 2005, thereby triggering the exception to the 2005 schedule's application. The Board also upheld the admission of this report and a defendant's letter into evidence, as they were in the defendant's possession prior to discovery closing.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDDENYING RECONSIDERATIONWCJ REPORTADMITTING EVIDENCEDISCOVERY CLOSEDJUDICIAL AUTHORITYORIGINAL JURISDICTIONDELEGATION OF POWERSFINDINGS AND AWARDPERMANENT DISABILITY SCHEDULE
References
Case No. GRO 0021432
Regular
Apr 28, 2008

Theodore Maiso vs. State of California, Department of Mental Health, State Compensation Insurance Fund, State Contract Services

This case involves a petition for reconsideration by applicant Theodore Maiso against the State of California, Department of Mental Health. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report and reasoning. The Board also corrected a technicality by ordering the substitution of "State of California, Division of Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Appeals Board" in place of "State of California, Division of Workers' Compensation" in the WCJ's decision headings to accurately reflect the judicial authority.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDTheodore MaisoState of California Department of Mental HealthLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundAdjusting AgencyOrder Denying ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeJudicial AuthorityOriginal Jurisdiction
References
Case No. MON 0316299
Regular
Mar 20, 2008

ROBERT WYATT vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Finally, the WCAB ordered a technical correction to the headings of the Workers' Compensation Judge's decision to properly reflect the Appeals Board's authority.

Petition for ReconsiderationFinal OrderInterlocutory DecisionSubstantive RightLiability DeterminationPetition for RemovalSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmWCJ's ReportJudicial Authority
References
Showing 1-10 of 195 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational