CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Anderson v. Bernstein

The petitioner initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a July 28, 1977, determination by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, which affirmed a local agency's decision to discontinue her aid to dependent children grant. The Commissioner's decision was based on the petitioner's alleged failure to disclose biweekly support payments from her husband, a finding supported by his signed statement and an agency worksheet. However, neither the husband nor the agency worker testified at the fair hearing. The court found that the evidence presented was insufficient to refute the petitioner's testimony that she had not received support payments from her husband after February 1977. Consequently, the petition was granted, the determination annulled, and the case remitted to the State commissioner for a new hearing.

Public AssistanceAid to Dependent ChildrenFair HearingSufficiency of EvidenceSupport PaymentsDue ProcessAdministrative ReviewRemandSocial Services LawCPLR Article 78
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

State ex rel. Dunn v. Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children

Maureen M. Dunn filed a writ of habeas corpus to regain custody of "Baby Girl" Dunn, born April 6, 1986, after executing a surrender for adoption to Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children (CHB) on May 1, 1986. The child was placed with prospective adoptive parents, John and Mary Doe, on April 10, 1986. Dunn attempted to revoke her surrender on May 21, 1986, within the 30-day period stipulated by Social Services Law § 384(5). The adoptive parents moved to dismiss or transfer the case, arguing against Supreme Court jurisdiction. The court retained jurisdiction and, following hearings, addressed Dunn's claims of fraud, duress, or coercion in the surrender's execution, which it ultimately denied despite concerns about CHB's procedures and a witness's credibility. The court also clarified the application of Social Services Law §§ 383(6) and 384(5) regarding the natural mother's rights post-surrender, ruling that Dunn lost her presumption of superiority once the child was placed in an adoptive home, requiring the custody determination to be based solely on the child's best interests. Considering the stability, financial security, and family ties of the adoptive parents versus the natural mother's temporary employment, uncertain support from the natural father, and past substance use during pregnancy, the court found it in the child's best interest to remain with the adoptive parents and be adopted by them.

AdoptionChild CustodyHabeas CorpusSurrender of Parental RightsBest Interests of the ChildParental RightsSocial Services LawRevocation of SurrenderFraudDuress
References
10
Case No. ADJ9803664
Regular
Dec 04, 2015

JUAN GONZALEZ (Deceased), DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL DISABILITY & RETIREMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal and rescinded a judge's order that stayed proceedings pending the outcome of a probate case. The WCAB determined that probate court findings have limited relevance to determining workers' compensation death benefits and that the WCAB has sole jurisdiction over dependency issues. By staying the proceedings, the judge's order caused significant prejudice to the defendant, SCIF, by hindering discovery and resolution of a potential partial dependency claim. The matter was reset for further proceedings, with parties urged to attempt informal settlement.

Death benefitsDependencyWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceProbate proceedingsLabor CodeCalifornia Highway PatrolState Compensation Insurance FundDeath Without Dependents Unit
References
1
Case No. ADJ12616197
Regular
Jan 12, 2022

VANESSA FATZER (Deceased) KATRINA S. HAGEN, Director of Department of Industrial Relations, administrator for Death Without Dependents Unit JOEL STAPLETON III vs. KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by ESIS, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior finding, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The Board found that the original decision, which determined Mr. Stapleton was a partial dependent of the deceased, was not supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, the WCJ's credibility assessment of Mr. Stapleton and his father was insufficient as their testimony was solely from deposition transcripts and they were not called as witnesses at trial. The Board emphasized that deposition testimony alone is insufficient to establish credibility for a dependency determination.

Death Without Dependents UnitPartial DependentLabor Code Section 4706.5Dependency DeterminationCredibility of WitnessesDeposition TestimonySubstantial EvidenceFurther ProceedingsReconsiderationRescission
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Gabisch v. J. F. C. Rental Corp.

Martin C. Gabisch died from injuries sustained in a work-related accident on March 28, 1985. His parents, Martin J. Gabisch and his wife (referred to as Claimant Mother), filed a claim for compensation asserting dependency. Initially, a finding of dependence was made, but the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed this, concluding that the claimants were not wholly or partially dependent on the decedent. The claimants subsequently appealed this Board decision. The court reviewed the evidence, noting that the deceased contributed approximately $550 per month to the family income, while the claimant father earned about $3,000 per month. The court determined that the evidence presented did not establish that the claimants were dependent upon the decedent, as they needed to prove they were not independently self-supporting. Consequently, the Board’s decision was affirmed.

Parental DependencyWorkers' CompensationAppellate ReviewFinancial SupportWork-Related AccidentDependency ClaimBoard DecisionAffirmation
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 10, 1977

Hernandez v. Frangella Bros.

This case involves an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision that found the decedent's father to be a dependent of the deceased employee under the Workers' Compensation Law. The claimant, the decedent's father, had a prior injury and consistently received financial support from his son, ranging from $15 to $60, totaling over $2,000 in the year before the son's death. The Board inferred that the father's standard of living was detrimentally affected by the loss of these contributions. The court affirmed the Board's determination, holding that questions of dependency and contribution are factual for the Board, and in this instance, there was substantial evidence to support their finding. Costs were awarded to the Workers' Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier.

Dependency claimWorkers' Compensation BoardAppellate DivisionParental dependencyFinancial contributionsSubstantial evidenceQuestion of factAffirmed decisionDeceased employee
References
2
Case No. ADJ7365717
Regular
Oct 18, 2012

JAMES VAN DELL (Deceased), LORILENE VAN DELL (Dependent) vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

This case involves a widow's claim for death benefits after her firefighter husband died from prostate cancer. The defendant, County of Los Angeles, unreasonably delayed payment by requesting tax returns that were partially blacked out by the IRS, despite the widow's attorney providing explanations and other evidence of dependency. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior order finding no unreasonable delay, determined that a penalty is warranted due to the defendant's unreasonable refusal to provide benefits. The matter is returned to the WCJ to determine the amount of the penalty based on established legal factors.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardDeath BenefitsPenaltiesLabor Code Section 3501Labor Code Section 5814DependencyTotal DependentPartial DependentUnreasonable DelayReconsideration
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cianciulli v. Perales

This case concerns a petitioner's challenge under CPLR article 78 against determinations by the New York State Commissioner of Social Services. The Commissioner affirmed a local agency's decision to discontinue the petitioner's Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) grant due to receiving a lump-sum income exceeding household needs. The Commissioner also affirmed that a $2,600 loan repayment was not a life-threatening circumstance, thus not deductible from the lump-sum income for AFDC reapplication. The court confirmed both determinations, finding the petitioner's arguments lacked merit. It rejected claims that regulation 18 NYCRR 352.29 [h] violates constitutional duties or statutory mandates, or creates an invalid conclusive presumption of income availability. The court upheld the Commissioner's interpretation that life-threatening situations occur after lump-sum receipt, not for prior debts, even if those debts were for life-threatening circumstances at the time they were incurred.

AFDCLump-sum incomePublic assistanceSocial Services LawLife-threatening circumstanceLoan repaymentAdministrative reviewConstitutional lawStatutory interpretationEligibility criteria
References
7
Case No. ADJ7472371
Regular
Oct 19, 2016

GOLDEN DAVE DUBOISE (Deceased); DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT; PAMELA MEGAN DUBOISE, vs. BLACK ROAD AUTO & TOW; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Department of Industrial Relations' petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that Pamela Duboise was a partial dependent of the deceased employee, Golden Dave Duboise. This determination was based on evidence of past child support payments and cash gifts, establishing reliance for her maintenance. The Board distinguished this case from precedents where dependency was based solely on legal obligation without actual contributions.

Death Without Dependents UnitPamela Megan Duboisepartial dependentdeath benefitschild supportarrearageDivorce DecreeArkansas state courtWCJPetition for Reconsideration
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Mar 30, 1979

Rosario v. Blum

The petitioner's grant of aid to dependent children was terminated due to her failure to provide information regarding her husband's presence in the household. She challenged this determination, along with issues concerning a prior termination and rent allowance, via an article 78 proceeding, also seeking $10,000 in damages and counsel fees. The court confirmed the administrative determination, finding substantial evidence that her husband was living in the household, thus affecting her eligibility for the grant. The petitioner's claims for damages and counsel fees were denied on both merit and procedural grounds, as such claims were deemed an impermissible intrusion in an article 78 proceeding.

Public AssistanceAid to Dependent ChildrenEligibilityDue ProcessArticle 78Damages ClaimCounsel FeesHousehold CompositionSpousal PresenceAdministrative Review
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 9,284 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational