CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ17726478, ADJ15918108
Regular
Oct 10, 2025

CHRISTINA AVILES vs. SAMUEL HALE, LLC & DIBARA MASONRY, LLC; CLEAR SPRING PROPERTY AND CASUALTY; ARCH INSURANCE

Applicant Christina Aviles sought reconsideration of a Findings of Fact and Orders (F&O) issued on July 11, 2025, which dismissed her cumulative injury claim for lack of jurisdiction, asserting a valid collective bargaining and alternative dispute resolution agreement. She argued defendants failed to prove the validity of these agreements. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinded the F&O, and returned the case for further proceedings. The WCAB found the trial record incomplete due to unresolved objections to evidence and a factual error regarding the workers' compensation carrier. The board also clarified the permissibility of 'notice to produce' in workers' compensation proceedings.

Collective Bargaining AgreementAlternative Dispute ResolutionLabor Code 3201.7Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJurisdictionPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact and OrdersSamuel Hale LLCDiBara Masonry LLCClear Spring Property and Casualty
References
Case No. ADJ7339980
Regular
Dec 24, 2014

EDITH GALVEZ vs. HANFORD HOTELS, LLC, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, HELMSMAN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration due to a failure to meet the verification requirements of Labor Code section 5902. Specifically, the petition and its attached verifications were either unsigned or defective, preventing the Board from confirming proper execution. Even if the petition had been properly verified, the WCAB would have denied it on the merits based on the administrative law judge's report.

Petition for ReconsiderationVerificationLabor Code Section 5902DismissalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJHanford HotelsLLCAmerican Home AssuranceHelmsman
References
Case No. ADJ6775950
Regular
Jun 22, 2017

MARTIN MENDOZA vs. W&M TEXTILE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a petition for reconsideration filed by lien claimant Physician Funding Solutions, LLC. The Board rescinded the prior order dismissing the lien of Physician Funding Rancho Cucamonga and Rx Funding Solutions Rancho Cucamonga. The WCJ's report, which was adopted by the Board, provided the reasoning for this decision. This order reinstates the dismissed liens.

Physician Funding SolutionsLLCRx Funding SolutionsLLCPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ ReportGrant ReconsiderationRescind Order
References
Case No. ADJ10009703 ADJ10043837
Regular
Feb 19, 2019

ZULAY DAVILA vs. EMPLOYERS RESOURCE GROUP, VENSURE HR, INC., LCF LIBERTY JR, LLC/SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, PROPORTION FOODS, LLC/REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's decision due to a due process violation. The WCJ had determined employment by ERG without providing ERG notice and an opportunity to be heard. The WCAB returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings to determine employment status. Issues of insurance coverage will be subject to mandatory arbitration once employment is established.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardVENSURE HRSecurity National Insurance CompanyProportion FoodsLLCREDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIESAMTRUST NORTH AMERICAEMPLOYMENT RESOURCES GROUPINC.
References
Case No. ADJ10201509
Regular
Aug 28, 2019

ANGELA GARCIA vs. MANI BROTHERS NINE THOUSAND DE, LLC

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a Petition for Reconsideration filed by lien claimant Qualified Billing and Collections, LLC, in the case of Angela Garcia v. Mani Brothers Nine Thousand DE, LLC. The Board adopted the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge, finding no evidence of fraud by the defendant concerning a deposition. Additionally, the Board admonished the lien claimant's representative for attaching inadmissible exhibits to their petition, warning of future sanctions for non-compliance with Board rules. Consequently, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ reportlien claimantfrauddepositionIlona KulikovaQualified Billing and CollectionsLLCAppeals Board Rule 10842(c)
References
Case No. ADJ310891 (LAO 0859195) (MF) ADJ109830 (LAO 0859199) ADJ469798 (LAO 0859196) ADJ1234133 (LAO 0859197) ADJ2754911 (LAO 0859198)
Regular
Jan 13, 2017

MARIA ELENA MORENO vs. SONNET TOOLS, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding that lien claimants Orthogear LLC and Olorun LLC lawfully assigned their lien interests to Olorun Management, Inc., satisfying Labor Code section 4903.8(a) due to Orthogear's dissolution. The Board also upheld the order for the defendant to pay $360.00 for a medical device, plus penalties and interest, due to unreasonable payment delay. The defendant failed to present evidence contradicting the lien claimant's asserted valid assignment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien AssignmentLabor Code Section 4903.8(a)Business DissolutionOlorun ManagementOrthogear LLCOlorun LLCStacie GreenspanPetition for ReconsiderationBurden of Proof
References
Case No. ADJ8160241, ADJ8160224
Regular
Oct 04, 2012

MIGUEL DOMINGUEZ vs. MYERS CONTAINER,LLC

This case concerns Miguel Dominguez versus Myers Container, LLC, consolidated under Case No. ADJ8160241 and ADJ8160224. A petition for removal was filed by the applicant and subsequently withdrawn. As a result of the withdrawal, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petition for removal. No further action will be taken on this matter.

Petition for RemovalDismissedWithdrawnWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardMIGUEL DOMINGUEZMYERS CONTAINERLLCCCMSIADJ8160241ADJ8160224
References
Case No. ADJ400686 (VNO 0499836)
Regular
Nov 08, 2016

MICHAEL CURZI vs. PHARMAVITE, LLC, TRAVELERS DIAMOND BAR

In *Curzi v. Pharmavite, LLC*, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to further study the case. The WCAB amended the original decision to defer issues of sleep disorder, permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees. This action was taken to allow for further development of the record regarding the industrial causation of the sleep disorder. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPharmaviteLLCTravelers Diamond BarADJ400686VNO 0499836Opinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings and Awardcomputer operatorindustrial injury
References
Case No. ADJ848157
Regular
Mar 09, 2011

CURTIS THOMAS vs. RAJ TENTS, LLC, SCIF INSURED PLEASANTON

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has dismissed a petition for reconsideration filed by a party in the case of Curtis Thomas v. Raj Tents, LLC. This dismissal is a result of the petitioner voluntarily withdrawing their reconsideration request. Consequently, the WCAB's prior decision from January 10, 2011, remains in effect.

Petition for ReconsiderationWithdrawn PetitionDismissed PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCurtis ThomasRaj TentsLLCSCIF Insured PleasantonADJ848157OAK 0347928
References
Case No. ADJ7013901
Regular
May 03, 2011

CHANG HYUN KIM vs. SYSTEM CARWASH, LLC, GUARD INSURANCE GROUP

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration of the applicant's case, Chang Hyun Kim, against System Carwash, LLC and Guard Insurance Group. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) as the basis for their denial. The specific reasons for the denial are detailed in the WCJ's report, which was not provided here. Therefore, the applicant's petition for reconsideration was formally rejected.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' compensation administrative law judgeDenying ReconsiderationSystem CarwashLLCGuard Insurance GroupADJ7013901Ronnie G. CaplaneAleonso J. Moresi
References
Showing 1-10 of 487 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational