CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim Eccles v. Truck-Lite, Inc.

The claimant sustained a head injury after falling from a chair at work and sought workers' compensation benefits. The employer and its carrier disputed the claim, attributing the fall to a non-work-related medical condition. The Workers' Compensation Board ruled that the accident and injuries were not caused by the claimant's preexisting diabetic condition and awarded benefits. The employer and carrier appealed. The court affirmed the Board's decision, noting the Board's authority to assess witness credibility and medical expert opinions, and found the presumption of compensability under Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 had not been rebutted. The court also upheld the Board's rejection of the argument that the claim should be denied due to a violation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a.

Workers' CompensationFall from ChairHead InjuryDiabetic ConditionHypoglycemiaPresumption of CompensabilityCredibility AssessmentMedical Expert OpinionAppellate ReviewSection 21 WCL
References
4
Case No. LBO 0370243
Regular
May 19, 2008

JOEL GRIMALDO vs. ABBEY EVENT SERVICES / STELLAR EVENT \& PRESENTATION, AMERICAN HOME INSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a previous finding, ruling that the applicant's diabetes was not industrially caused. While the applicant sustained an admitted industrial injury to his left foot, the Board found substantial medical evidence indicating his diabetes was a pre-existing condition that complicated the foot injury rather than being caused by it. Consequently, the decision was amended to exclude diabetes as an industrial injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardindustrial injurydiabetesfoot injuryosteomyelitisamputationcausationmedical evidencereconsiderationapportionment
References
8
Case No. ADJ3588877 (SAC 0332526)
Regular
Jul 19, 2011

Laurie Shreffler vs. Electronic Data System, Hewlett Packard, Travelers Insurance Company

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision, the Appeals Board reversed the finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury related to diabetes. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which favored Dr. Nishimura's medical opinion over Dr. Nacouzi's regarding the diabetes. While the award for temporary and permanent disability remains, the applicant is no longer entitled to industrial medical treatment for her diabetes. The decision otherwise affirmed the original award for injuries to the neck, low back, psyche, and irritable bowel syndrome.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardElectronic Data SystemHewlett PackardTravelers Insurance Companyindustrial injurylow backneckpsycheirritable bowel syndromediabetes
References
1
Case No. ADJ2590975 (STK 0190237)
Regular
Sep 12, 2011

RAFAEL DELEON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR, MULE CREEK PRISON, adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board affirmed a prior award granting medical treatment for applicant's diabetes. Despite the defendant's argument that diabetes treatment was for a non-industrial condition, the Board found it necessary to prevent worsening of the applicant's industrially caused heart disease. Medical evaluators concluded that controlling diabetes is an essential component of treating industrial heart conditions, making the treatment compensable. The decision hinges on the principle that treatment for non-industrial conditions is covered when essential to cure or relieve the effects of an industrial injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjuryHeart ConditionDiabetesGastrointestinal DifficultiesAgreed Medical EvaluatorTreating PhysicianCardiologistMedical TreatmentLabor Code Section 4600
References
9
Case No. ADJ1577836
Regular
May 04, 2009

JESUS GAVINO-REMIGIO vs. STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns an applicant injured when stepping on a metal hook, sustaining an admitted industrial injury to his right foot. The applicant sought reconsideration after the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) denied findings that the injury also affected his internal systems (diabetes), eyes, and psyche, along with associated disability. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant's medical expert's opinion on non-industrial diabetes causation to be substantial evidence, while deeming the applicant's medical experts' opinions insufficient. A dissenting commissioner argued the applicant's medical evidence sufficiently supported industrial causation for diabetes aggravation, warranting reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardindustrial injuryright footinternal systemseyespsychediabetes mellituspermanent disabilitytemporary disabilityGerald Markovitz M.D.
References
5
Case No. SFO 0478857
Regular
Jan 04, 2008

GEORGE JOHNSON vs. CITY OF BRENTWOOD

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to reverse the prior award finding industrial injury to the heart in the form of diabetes. The Board determined there was no substantial medical evidence that diabetes constituted "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212, as it is a risk factor, not a present cardiac condition. Consequently, the award of permanent disability and further medical treatment related to the heart was rescinded, while affirming other findings regarding a hernia.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardGeorge JohnsonCity of BrentwoodSFO 0478857Opinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationFindings and Awardcumulative traumapolice officerindustrial injuryhernia
References
2
Case No. MON 297119
Regular
Apr 01, 2008

EDMUND BURNS, Jr. vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

This case concerns a police officer who sustained an industrial injury to his right foot after stepping on a foreign object, which, due to his pre-existing diabetes, led to a gangrenous infection and amputation. The defendant argued for apportionment of the permanent disability to the applicant's diabetes, but the Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision. The medical evidence indicated that the amputation would not have occurred absent the industrial injury, thus establishing industrial causation for the entire permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityApportionmentPre-existing DiabetesCausationEscobedo v. MarshallsSenate Bill 899Qualified Medical ExaminerTreating Physician
References
8
Case No. ADJ1728931
Regular
Apr 28, 2011

GEORGE PARGA vs. CITY OF FRESNO, AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS FRESNO

This case involved an applicant, George Parga, who suffered an industrial injury to his right big toe and knee while employed as a police officer. The initial award apportioned 9% permanent disability, attributing half to pre-existing diabetes. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the medical expert's apportionment opinion lacked substantial evidence as diabetes did not cause disability at the time of evaluation. Consequently, the Board awarded an unapportioned 18% permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardGeorge PargaCity of FresnoAmerican All Risk Loss FresnoOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationPolice OfficerIndustrial InjuryRight Big ToeRight Knee
References
2
Case No. ADJ9157780
Regular
Jun 13, 2019

GEORGE GALLARDO vs. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC., OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) partially affirmed a prior award, finding that the applicant sustained industrial injuries to his neck, back, psyche, hips, and knees. However, the WCAB deferred the issues of injury in the form of diabetes, the applicant's overall permanent disability, and his average weekly wage. This deferral stems from insufficient substantial evidence regarding the industrial causation of diabetes and the applicant's full earnings from all concurrent employments. The case is returned to the Workers' Compensation Judge for further proceedings to develop the record on these deferred issues.

AOE/COEPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and Ordertemporary disability indemnityaverage weekly wageorthopedic examinationdiabetic neuropathyvascular diseaseadjustment disordercontinuous trauma
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Castaldo v. Fee Oil Co.

Claimant sustained serious injuries in a work-related accident. Sixteen months later, he was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, which he contended was precipitated by stress from the accident. The Workers’ Compensation Board heard conflicting medical testimony on the causal link between stress and diabetes, ultimately finding the condition causally related to the accident. The employer and carrier appealed, arguing the Board erred in establishing causation. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the Board's resolution of conflicting medical testimony involved questions of fact and credibility, which should not be disturbed.

Workers' CompensationDiabetes MellitusCausationStress-Induced IllnessWork InjuryMedical EvidenceAppellate ReviewBoard DecisionCompensable InjuryEmployer Liability
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 93 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational