CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2016-01-0139
Regular Panel Decision
May 10, 2016

Brown, Bonnie v. Whole Foods Markets, Inc.

Employee Bonnie Brown filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) alleging a compensable spinal injury sustained on July 22, 2015, in the course and scope of her employment as a food preparer for Whole Foods Markets, Inc. The disputed issues included the employer's failure to provide a proper panel of back specialists/neurosurgeons and to provide requested discovery documents. Ms. Brown subsequently filed a Request for Expedited Hearing, seeking to resolve these discovery issues based on a review of the file without an evidentiary hearing. However, the Workers' Compensation Judge, Thomas Wyatt, denied the expedited hearing request. The Court determined that Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law, specifically Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239, does not permit discovery disputes to be addressed through an expedited hearing. Instead, discovery disputes must be adjudicated upon the review of written motions and affidavits, and Ms. Brown was advised to utilize standard discovery procedures and potentially file a motion to compel if necessary. A Status Conference was set for June 7, 2016.

Expedited Hearing RequestDiscovery DisputesWorkers' Compensation LawSpinal InjuryPetition for Benefit DeterminationDenial of RequestProcedural RulesStatus ConferenceAppeals BoardTennessee Law
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Turner v. Montgomery

Relator Cheryl Turner sought a writ of mandamus to compel Judge John Montgomery to grant discovery in her divorce case, aiming to value her community property interest in her husband, Sylvester Turner's, law firm, Barnes and Turner. Judge Montgomery had denied the discovery requests, citing attorney-client privilege based on the Enos v. Baker precedent. However, the appellate court determined that Sylvester Turner failed to preserve his claim of privilege by not offering evidence or requesting an in camera inspection of the documents. The court also noted that many of the requested documents were not 'unquestionably privileged' and that the judge had improperly denied requests on un-urged grounds. Consequently, the appellate court conditionally granted the writ of mandamus, ordering Judge Montgomery to vacate his original discovery order.

MandamusDiscoveryAttorney-Client PrivilegeDivorceCommunity PropertyLaw Firm ValuationAbuse of DiscretionWaiver of PrivilegeIn Camera InspectionTexas Rules of Civil Procedure
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
May 15, 2018

Matter of Center for Discovery, Inc. v. NYC Dept. of Educ.

The Center for Discovery, Inc. appealed a lower court's dismissal of its CPLR article 78 petition against the NYC Department of Education. Petitioner sought reimbursement for additional, mandated services provided to a student with autism, which NYCDE refused to cover. The Supreme Court had dismissed the case, citing a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Appellate Division reversed this decision, ruling that NYCDE's definitive refusal to pay constituted an exhaustion of administrative remedies. The matter is remanded to the Supreme Court to determine if NYCDE must reimburse The Center for Discovery for the services it explicitly required.

Education LawSpecial EducationIndividualized Education PlanAdministrative LawReimbursement DisputeCPLR Article 78Appellate ReviewAutism Spectrum DisorderChildren with DisabilitiesGovernment Liability
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburg v. Jones

This case involves an appeal by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (National Union) against an order of sanctions for abuse of discovery. The original suit was filed by Jones, appealing an industrial accident board award in a worker’s compensation claim. The trial court sanctioned National Union for evasive responses to discovery requests, ordering them to respond to admissions and pay $1,200 in attorneys' fees. On appeal, the court found that National Union had not waived its right to appeal the sanctions due to an explicit reservation in the agreed judgment. The court affirmed the trial court's order of sanctions, finding no abuse of discretion, and also denied Jones' cross-point seeking damages for a frivolous appeal.

Discovery AbuseSanctionsAppellate ReviewWorkers' CompensationAttorneys' FeesDue ProcessWaiver of AppealFrivolous AppealTexas Rules of Civil ProcedureTexas Rules of Appellate Procedure
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 181 v. Casatelli Electric, Inc.

The plaintiffs, comprising a union, various benefit funds, and a training committee, initiated a lawsuit against Casatelli Electric, Inc., its alleged alter egos William and Alberta Brittelli, D.C. Electric, and Reliance Insurance Company of New York, seeking to recover fringe benefit contributions, union dues, and vacation monies. The case primarily involved disputes over extensive discovery requests, including interrogatories and document production. A Magistrate Judge found the plaintiffs' discovery requests to be excessive and imposed limitations on the scope of initial discovery, reserving the possibility for further discovery at a later stage. The plaintiffs filed objections to these orders, which were reviewed by District Judge Pooler. The District Judge largely affirmed the Magistrate Judge's decisions, finding them not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, but did grant a minor modification regarding the production of educational and employment information for the Brittelli defendants and their son. Additionally, the defendants' request for attorney's fees was denied.

Discovery DisputeCorporate Veil PiercingAlter EgoSuccessor LiabilityFringe Benefit ContributionsUnion DuesVacation MoniesInterrogatoriesDocument ProductionMagistrate Judge Review
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Hoffmann v. S.J. Hawk, Inc.

In an action seeking damages for personal injuries, the defendants initiated an appeal against two orders issued by the Supreme Court, Queens County. The first order, dated June 11, 1998, denied their motion for discovery related to earnings, no-fault benefits, and Workers’ Compensation benefits. The second order, dated September 14, 1998, rejected their request for the plaintiffs to provide authorization for obtaining Social Security Disability records. The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, finding that the trial court appropriately exercised its discretion in limiting collateral source discovery. The ruling referenced City of Mount Vernon v Lexington Ins. Co. as a general precedent.

DiscoveryCollateral Source RulePersonal Injury DamagesNo-Fault InsuranceWorkers' Compensation BenefitsSocial Security DisabilityAppellate ProcedureEvidence RulesJudicial DiscretionCivil Procedure
References
2
Case No. 2016-06-1026
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 26, 2016

Bailey, Sr., Jerry W. v. Team Construction, LLC

This case concerns Jerry W. Bailey, Sr.'s request for an expedited hearing regarding medical treatment, reimbursement for past medical treatment, and temporary disability benefits, following a workplace back strain and the subsequent discovery of a thoracic mass. The central legal question revolved around whether the thoracic mass was caused by or aggravated by the workplace accident, thereby necessitating additional medical care and resulting in his inability to work. The Court, presided over by Judge Joshua Davis Baker, found that Mr. Bailey failed to provide sufficient expert medical proof to establish a causal relationship between his workplace accident and the thoracic mass, especially in light of Dr. Daniel Burrus's opinion. Consequently, the Court denied Mr. Bailey's requested relief, concluding that he was unlikely to succeed on the merits without countervailing medical evidence.

Medical CausationThoracic MassBack StrainExpedited HearingTemporary Disability BenefitsMedical Treatment ReimbursementBurden of ProofExpert Medical TestimonyCausation TheoryOccupational Injury
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 12, 1990

Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Valenzano

The Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund initiated an action against Marcello Valenzano, doing business as ABC Contracting Co., for unpaid workers' compensation insurance premiums. The defendant failed to comply with discovery requests, leading to an order conditionally striking his answer and later, a default judgment. Defendant's pro se motion to vacate the default judgment, asserting non-receipt of documents and partial compliance, was denied by the IAS court. The court found service proper and noted the defendant's failure to demonstrate a meritorious defense. The appellate court affirmed the decision, finding the lower court acted within its discretion to strike the answer for willful failure to comply with discovery, considering the lack of reasonable excuse and meritorious defense.

Default JudgmentDiscovery SanctionsFailure to ComplyWorkers' Compensation InsuranceVacate JudgmentMeritorious DefenseService of ProcessAppellate ReviewCivil ProcedureSupreme Court
References
3
Case No. 12-23-00212-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 11, 2023

In Re: Laura Lee Redman, Individually, Richard Redman, Individually, Brian G. Redman, Individually, Kristy L. Redman, Individually, Community Access, Inc., Redman Management, LLC, and Redman Legacy, LP v. the State of Texas

Relators (Laura Lee Redman, Richard Redman, Brian G. Redman, Kristy L. Redman, Community Access, Inc., Redman Management, LLC, and Redman Legacy, LP) filed an original proceeding challenging a trial court order that compelled them to respond to written discovery. The underlying action was brought by Kenny S. Frederick against the Relators for negligence and gross negligence related to personal injuries sustained by Devon Frederick at a care facility. The Relators argued the discovery requests were overbroad, encompassing irrelevant time periods, locations, and subject matter, and included financial information and employment files. The Court of Appeals found many discovery requests to be overbroad as a matter of law and conditionally granted the writ in part, directing the trial court to impose limitations on these requests. However, the court denied the Relators' arguments regarding confidential patient information and work product privilege due to waiver.

MandamusDiscovery DisputeOverbreadthTrial Court DiscretionAppellate ReviewCivil ProcedureTexas LawInterrogatoriesRequests for ProductionAbuse of Discretion
References
29
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.

This case involves a retaliatory discharge claim filed by former Nissan employee Clifford Michael Johnson, alleging termination after a workers' compensation claim. A discovery dispute arose concerning Johnson's request for broad personnel and medical information on other terminated employees and surveillance subjects at Nissan. The trial court compelled the discovery, but Nissan appealed, arguing irrelevance and ADA confidentiality concerns. The appellate court reversed, finding Johnson failed to demonstrate a compelling showing of relevance or that the value of the requested discovery outweighed the privacy interests of non-party employees. The court's order compelling discovery was vacated, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.

Retaliatory dischargeWorkers' compensation claimDiscovery disputePrivacy interestsAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA)Confidentiality of medical recordsPersonnel recordsAbuse of discretion standardRelevance in discoveryAppellate review
References
34
Showing 1-10 of 5,941 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational