CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9134227
Regular
Dec 18, 2015

VICTOR DIAZ vs. EXXEL OUTDOORS, INC.; THE HARTFORD

The applicant sought reconsideration of a dismissal order, arguing the judge failed to issue a proper notice of intent to dismiss. The Board denied the petition, finding the judge correctly amended an initial dismissal order to correct an error specifying dismissal "with prejudice" instead of "without prejudice" as initially noticed. This amendment was authorized by WCAB Rule 10859 and Labor Code 5803 to rectify a mistake and conform the order to the notice, which the applicant had not objected to. Therefore, no due process violation occurred, and the applicant received the relief sought.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationAmended Order Dismissing CaseNotice of Intention to DismissDismissal without prejudiceDismissal with prejudiceWCJWCAB Rule 10582WCAB Rule 10780WCAB Rule 10859
References
Case No. ADJ7337820
Regular
Apr 07, 2014

JOHN BOOTY vs. NEW YORK GIANTS, PMA GROUP, Arizona Cardinals, Fairmont Premier Insurance/Zenith Insurance Company

The applicant, a professional football player, claimed cumulative industrial injury against multiple NFL teams, including the New York Giants and the Arizona Cardinals. The applicant requested to dismiss the Arizona Cardinals with prejudice. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, amending the dismissal to be "without prejudice." This preserves the New York Giants' potential right to seek contribution from the Cardinals should they be found liable for benefits. The Board affirmed the applicant's right to choose which defendants to litigate against.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Party DefendantsCumulative InjuryProfessional Football PlayerNational Football LeagueJurisdictionLiabilityDate of InjuryCompromise & Release Agreement
References
Case No. ADJ3865022 (LAO 837425) ADJ1234925 (LAO 837426) ADJ4652554 (LAO 889199) ADJ4467339 (LAO 889200)
Regular
Dec 08, 2008

MANUEL VILLARREAL vs. DELUXE LABORATORIES, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board denied Defendant's petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and dismissed their petition for reconsideration as it was not from a final order. The Board noted that Applicant's refiling of dismissed claims was procedurally irregular and that the WCJ incorrectly denied dismissal on procedural grounds without addressing the substantive issue of good cause for relief from dismissal. The case is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to consider Defendant's contention that Applicant must show good cause to set aside the earlier dismissal order and to potentially dismiss the later-filed applications.

Petition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationWCJDismissal Without PrejudiceDuplicate ClaimsStatute of LimitationsLabor Code Section 5405Applications for Adjudication of ClaimNotice of Intention to DismissGood Cause to Set Aside Dismissal
References
Case No. ADJ9785760
Regular
Jan 17, 2017

MARGARITO SANDOVAL vs. RECANA, LLC, UNINSURED; NINA'S MEXICAN FOOD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, finding it was improperly filed against an order that was not a final determination. The WCAB also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, deeming it an extraordinary remedy not warranted by the circumstances. The WCJ had properly vacated an order of dismissal without prejudice, retaining jurisdiction and allowing the applicant to pursue their claim. The Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the defendant.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Vacating Order of DismissalDismissal without prejudicePetition for Dismissal for Lack of ProsecutionNotice of Intention to DismissLabor Code section 5410Labor Code section 5803substantial justiceextraordinary remedy
References
Case No. ADJ8902882
Regular
Jan 08, 2016

Veronica Sanchez vs. TJX Companies/Marshalls of California, LLC, Zurich American Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior dismissal order. The original dismissal was issued because lien claimant Able Physical Therapy failed to appear at a lien conference and did not object to a Notice of Intention to Dismiss. However, the WCAB found that the dismissal order erroneously dismissed the entire application, not just Able's lien, which was the scope of the notice. The WCAB also noted that Able claimed a settlement had been reached prior to the conference.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder of DismissalLien ConferenceNotice of Intention to DismissWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJPro PerLien ClaimantSettlementLack of Communication
References
Case No. LAO 0806287
Regular
Dec 13, 2007

AURORA BARAJAS vs. THE MAINLAND COMPANY, INC. aka CRAZY SHIRTS, INC., ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY, INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Administered By ACE USA/ESIS, CENTRE INSURANCE COMPANY Administered By REM, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Administered By COMPLINK

The Appeals Board granted Shidu Chiropractic's petition for reconsideration and amended the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decision. While Shidu was properly notified of the lien trial, the WCJ erred by issuing a Notice of Intention to Disallow Lien Claim instead of a Notice of Intention to Dismiss, and by dismissing the lien with prejudice. The lien is now dismissed without prejudice, acknowledging potential procedural errors by the WCJ.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantReconsiderationDismissal with PrejudiceNotice of Intention to DisallowNotice of Intention to DismissCompromise and ReleaseLien TrialGood CauseWithout Prejudice
References
Case No. SAL 0113718
Regular
Mar 21, 2008

MANUEL DeLANDA vs. SODEXHO, AIGRM

The applicant sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation claim dismissed with prejudice due to repeated failures to appear at hearings and a medical evaluation. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, amending the dismissal to be without prejudice. This decision acknowledges the applicant's lack of participation but prioritizes the public policy of disposing of cases on their merits.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationDismissal with PrejudiceDismissal without PrejudiceApplication for Adjudication of ClaimLaborerLeft Hand InjuryLeft Wrist InjuryLeft Upper Extremity InjurySequela
References
Case No. ADJ3539874 (LAO 0879315)
Regular
Oct 21, 2016

PAULA DE ALVA vs. ULTRAPRO, L.P., ICW GROUP / EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of an order dismissing her workers' compensation case without prejudice. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition. The WCAB found the original dismissal invalid because the defendant failed to properly serve all lien claimants with their petition for dismissal. Therefore, the WCAB rescinded the dismissal order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseDismissed without prejudicePetition for DismissalLien claimantsServiceInvalidRescindedReturned to trial levelWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
Case No. ADJ6959869
Regular
Nov 12, 2013

DAVID BODIN vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHARTIS CLAIMS INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an order that dismissed "Entertainment Partners" as a party defendant with prejudice. The applicant sought to have the dismissal be without prejudice to allow for potential rejoining of the defendant. The Board agreed with the judge's recommendation to amend the dismissal order. Therefore, Entertainment Partners is dismissed without prejudice, allowing the applicant to potentially rejoin them if further discovery warrants.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Party DefendantsCumulative Trauma InjuryDismissal Without PrejudiceFinal OrderSubstantive RightLiabilityWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeRejoin Defendant
References
Case No. ADJ7301665
Regular
Jan 30, 2012

COMELICA HERNANDEZ vs. OPTIMUS EMPLOYER SERVICES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The applicant sought reconsideration of an order dismissing her workers' compensation case without prejudice. She argued the dismissal was erroneous because she had objected and was now ready to proceed, asserting a due process right to a hearing. However, the Appeals Board dismissed her petition, finding it was filed untimely. The deadline to file a petition for reconsideration from a mailed order is 25 days, and the applicant's filing exceeded this jurisdictional limit.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Caseuntimely petitionjurisdictional time limitdue processhearing on the meritsdismissal without prejudicePetition to DismissLab. Code
References
Showing 1-10 of 6,317 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational