CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ15495436
Regular
Feb 18, 2025

Calvin Grigsby vs. Grigsby and Associates, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered two petitions from the applicant, Calvin Grigsby: a December 9, 2024 Petition for Reconsideration and/or Removal, and a December 24, 2024 Petition for Removal. The Board dismissed the reconsideration aspect of the December 9th petition as it pertained to non-final orders and denied removal, finding no demonstration of irreparable harm. The subsequent December 24th petition was also dismissed as it challenged the same December 4, 2024 orders. The Board also noted the applicant's failure to comply with page limits for the petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalNonfinal OrdersLabor Code Section 5909Electronic Adjudication Management SystemFinal OrderInterlocutory DecisionsSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmSupplemental Pleadings
References
15
Case No. ADJ6876456
Regular
Jan 27, 2010

MARILYN BROWN vs. COLLECTCORP CORPORATION, HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final order denying a motion to dismiss. The WCAB also dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal as untimely, as it was filed more than 20 days after the order it challenged. Furthermore, the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm, which is required for removal. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and the petition for removal were dismissed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAdministrative Law JudgeLabor Code $\S 5405$JurisdictionDue ProcessFinal OrderTimelinessCalifornia Code of Regulations
References
5
Case No. ADJ9202952
Regular
Nov 05, 2018

MARIA LOPEZ vs. KELLERMEYER BERGENSON SERVICES, LLC, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The WCAB dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Order Vacating, finding the order was not a final decision. However, it granted the defendant's Petition for Removal of that same Order Vacating, deeming it untimely under WCAB Rule 10859. Consequently, the WCAB vacated the Order Vacating, restoring the original July 5, 2018 Findings of Fact. The WCAB also dismissed the lien claimant's Petition for Removal, affirming the July 5, 2018 Findings of Fact which held the lien claimant bound by prior causation findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder VacatingFindings of FactAdministrative Law JudgeLien ClaimantSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmFinal Order
References
0
Case No. ADJ1169131 (SAL 0110199) ADJ3847252 (SAL 0114056)
Regular
Feb 02, 2011

MARIA R. REYNAGA vs. CASUALTY COMPANY AND ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE/ARROWPOINT CAPITAL

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petitions for reconsideration and removal. The WCAB found the initial petition for reconsideration was premature as it sought review of an interlocutory order, not a final decision. The subsequent petition was dismissed as untimely, filed 18 days after the statutory deadline for filing a petition for reconsideration from the WCJ's November 16, 2010 decision. The WCAB also denied the December 6, 2010 petition for removal, stating no substantial prejudice or irreparable injury was shown.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAdministrative Law JudgeIndustrial InjuryLumbar SpineBilateral KneesRight WristCumulative PeriodPermanent Disability Rating Schedule
References
13
Case No. ADJ8807200
Regular
Oct 24, 2014

RAFAEL ANGUIANO vs. NICK'S CABINET DOORS, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE

This case involves a defendant's unverified Petition for Removal challenging a WCJ's order denying dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition due to the unverified filing. However, the Board granted removal on its own motion, rescinded the WCJ's prior order, and returned the case to the trial level. This action was taken because neither the applicant's attorney's objection nor the defendant's Declaration of Readiness to Proceed effectively activated the case for the purpose of avoiding dismissal under Rule 10582.

Petition for RemovalLack of ProsecutionRule 10582Declaration of Readiness to ProceedPetition to DismissNotice of Intention to DismissVerification DefectUnverified PetitionRescinded OrderReturned to Trial Level
References
2
Case No. ADJ1358822
Regular
Aug 26, 2008

FRANCISCO RAMIREZ vs. TANIMURA & ANTLE, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY, Administered By CNA CLAIMS PLUS, BENDT & VALENTINE, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

The WCAB dismissed defendant Zenith's petition for removal (moot as the WCJ issued a decision), dismissed applicant's petition for reconsideration (interlocutory order), and denied applicant's petition for removal (no significant prejudice). The case was returned to trial level for further proceedings.

Valley FeverAgreed Medical ExaminerPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationAOE/COELabor Code section 4628substantial evidenceinterlocutory procedural ordersdiscretionary remedysignificant prejudice
References
14
Case No. ADJ7226408
Regular
Feb 16, 2012

Robert Thompson vs. VONS, A SAFEWAY COMPANY

Defendant Vons sought removal and reconsideration of a WCJ's order authorizing applicant's attorney to accept $3,000 for a diminished future earning capacity expert. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding the order interlocutory and not a final determination of substantive rights, nor was defendant directly aggrieved. The petition for removal was also dismissed as untimely regarding the reservation of jurisdiction in a prior award and because defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm. Ultimately, both the Petition for Removal and Petition for Reconsideration were dismissed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDismissalPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationStipulated AwardDiminished Future Earning CapacityDFEC ExpertOgilvie IssueJurisdiction ReservedInterlocutory Order
References
7
Case No. SFO 0489072
Regular
Apr 28, 2008

Joseph Royse vs. Heartworks Studios, LLC, DC3-E, LLLP, Lexington Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition to remove the stay on proceedings against co-defendants Heartworks Studios and DC3-E, affirming the WCJ's decision. However, the Board granted Lexington Insurance Company's petition to remove the applicant's dismissal of Lexington and Esther Phelps, reversing that order and reinstating Lexington as a party due to its admitted liability and significant benefit payments. The Board also dismissed Lexington's petition for reconsideration as the dismissal order was not final.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationPriority ConferenceStay of ProceedingsSuperior Court JurisdictionCivil ActionExclusive Remedy DefenseUninsured EmployersExpedited Hearing
References
1
Case No. ADJ9625941
Regular
Oct 15, 2015

DANIEL BORGSTROM vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed both the applicant's and defendant's petitions for reconsideration, as they were taken from non-final interlocutory orders concerning a discovery dispute over deposing the Chief of Police. The applicant's petition for removal was dismissed as moot because the WCJ rescinded the order denying the deposition, thereby allowing it. Finally, the defendant's petition for removal was denied, as they failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and liberal discovery for the fair resolution of cases was favored.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder RescindingDepositionChief of PoliceDiscovery DisputeNon-final OrderInterlocutory OrderDue Process
References
10
Case No. ADJ7768905
Regular
Sep 13, 2016

TRACEY LOMBARDI vs. SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition, which sought disqualification of the administrative law judge, removal, and reconsideration. The disqualification petition was denied as untimely, filed after the swearing of the first witness. The removal petition failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Finally, the reconsideration petition was dismissed because it did not seek review of a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for DisqualificationPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 5311Appeals Board Rule 10452Untimely PetitionExtraordinary RemedySubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable Harm
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 15,337 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational