CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ2070973 (SAL 0092454)
Regular
Jun 12, 2015

CHARLENE MEEKS-CLOSE vs. RIVER RANCH FRESH FOODS, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration due to untimely service on the applicant's counsel of record. The defendant failed to properly serve the petition, which is a procedural defect that deprives the applicant of due process rights. While one commissioner concurred with the dismissal on procedural grounds, she dissented regarding the merits, arguing the petition should have been granted to develop the record on the permanent disability rating. The majority opinion noted that even if properly served, the petition would have been denied on its merits.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderPermanent DisabilityLife PensionHousekeeping ExpensesMileage ExpensesUnreasonable DelayPenaltyAgreed Medical Evaluator
References
Case No. ADJ9709124
Regular
Jul 12, 2019

FELIPE VERDUZCO vs. JT WIMSATT CONTRACTING COMPANY, AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case involves lien claimants ResHealth and Javlin seeking reconsideration of a decision that denied ResHealth standing due to its dissolved corporate status. The Appeals Board has rescinded the prior findings and returned the case to the trial level for consolidation. This consolidation, under the master file *Patricia Valles vs. JIB Holdings I LLC*, aims to address common legal and factual issues concerning ResHealth's liens and potential stays under Labor Code section 4615. The consolidation will ensure consistent rulings, protect due process, and promote judicial economy.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationLien ClaimantsLabor Code 4615Corporate Status SuspensionFranchise Tax BoardConsolidationMaster FileSpecial Adjudication UnitDue Process
References
Case No. RIV 054592
Regular
Nov 16, 2007

LOURDES CERVANTES vs. CARL'S JR. ENTERPRISES, ST. PAUL'S TRAVELERS INSURANCE

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award, amending it to defer the issue of applicant's attorney's fees from EDD's lien recovery. This was due to the WCJ failing to issue a Notice of Intention to award such fees, violating EDD's due process rights. The Board also deferred the issue of whether EDD is entitled to interest on its lien.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderTemporary disability indemnityAttorney's feesLabor Code section 4903.2Notice of Intention (NIT)Unemployment Insurance Code section 2629.1(e)Industrial injury
References
Case No. ADJ4611905
Regular
Jan 13, 2011

JAMES EGLOFF vs. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a WCJ's order for interim home health payments. The Board found the WCJ's order, which mandated $2,500 monthly payments for three months, constituted a final decision improperly issued without evidence or notice to the defendant. Due to the lack of a complete record and violation of due process, the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board dismissed the defendant's petition for removal, deeming reconsideration the appropriate remedy.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationInterim PaymentHome Health CareNeuropsyche InjuryChemical ExposurePermanent DisabilityDue ProcessLabor Code Section 5313
References
Case No. ADJ8613780
Regular
Jan 12, 2017

GLENN PARKER vs. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS, TIG/FAIRMONT PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY, NEW YORK GIANTS, GULF/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, BUFFALO BILLS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns whether California has sufficient jurisdiction to hear a workers' compensation claim for cumulative injury filed by a former professional football player. The applicant played 12 out of 176 total games in California, which the majority found to be a de minimis contact insufficient for California to assert jurisdiction due to due process concerns, citing the *Johnson* case. The Board affirmed the trial judge's decision to deny jurisdiction, while also correcting a clerical error regarding the insurer. A dissenting commissioner argued that California's interest in protecting workers injured within the state is substantial and that the applicant's contacts were not de minimis.

WCABcumulative industrial injuryprofessional athletede minimis California contactsdue processsubject matter jurisdictionFederal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson)constitutional due processextraterritorial provisionsstatutory exemption
References
Case No. ADJ16334598
Regular
Oct 13, 2025

ANTHONY REYES vs. XPO LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE

Applicant Anthony Reyes filed a petition for removal challenging an order by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that took the matter off calendar. The WCAB granted removal, determining that the WCJ's order violated the parties' right to due process by failing to create a record or explain the deferral of the additional panels issue, thus constituting irreparable harm. As a Decision After Removal, the Appeals Board rescinded the April 24, 2025, order taking the matter off calendar and returned the case to the trial level to establish a proper record. The Board explicitly stated it made no judgment on the merits of additional panels at this stage due to the lack of a formal record.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Matter Off CalendarAdditional PanelsDue Process ViolationIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceRecord CreationTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRescind Order
References
Case No. ADJ2652722 (VNO 0436560)
Regular
Jul 31, 2015

ABDULLAH JOMAA vs. ROOHANIS 76 STATION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY, In Liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a WCJ's order allowing a physician's lien. The defendant argued it was denied due process due to lack of notice regarding the lien and subsequent proceedings. The WCAB found the defendant was indeed denied due process because they did not receive adequate notice of the lien claim or the proceedings. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLien conferenceDue processNoticeDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedStatute of limitationsLachesOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseNotice of Intention to allow lien
References
Case No. ADJ603509 (LAO 888258)
Regular
Oct 25, 2010

PATRICIA NUNEZ vs. MAINSTAY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

This case concerns lien claimants seeking reconsideration of a prior Board decision. The Board denied their petition, affirming its prior ruling that they failed to prove they were part of the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN) when providing services. Lien claimants' arguments regarding the MPN's validity and due process were waived due to untimeliness and failure to raise issues earlier. Furthermore, the Board found no denial of due process as lien claimants had actual notice of the defendant's petition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMedical Provider Network (MPN)Lien ClaimantsReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law Judge (WCJ)Compromise and ReleaseDue ProcessService of Process
References
Case No. ADJ8613826
Regular
May 02, 2016

WALTER D. VILLATORO vs. POTENTIAL INDUSTRIES, ZURICH

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded an order dismissing lien claimant Innovative Orthopedic Services' lien. The lien claimant argued it was denied due process because it never received notice of a lien conference or a Notice of Intention to Dismiss (NIT). The WCAB found that the lien claimant's due process rights were violated due to a lack of record of proper service of the NIT and any further lien conference notice. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationNotice of Intention to DismissCompromise and ReleaseDue processNotice of Lien ConferenceAdministrative law judgeRescindVoid ab initio
References
Showing 1-10 of 4,914 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational