CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Lowcher v. Beame

Plaintiff, a former school secretary, initiated a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, the New York Teachers’ Retirement System, and the New York City Employees’ Retirement System. She alleged deprivation of her constitutional rights to due process and equal protection after her application for accident disability benefits was denied. The Medical Board of the New York Teachers’ Retirement System determined her disability was not proximately caused by a 1970 assault, and denied her requests for legal representation, witnesses, and access to a referred physician's report. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. Judge Metzner denied the motion, ruling that while a full adversarial hearing was not required, the plaintiff was entitled to know the evidence upon which the Retirement System made its determination, implying a due process violation in denying access to the medical report.

Due ProcessEqual ProtectionCivil Rights ActionDisability BenefitsAccident DisabilityAdministrative LawMedical BoardRight to CounselCross-ExaminationAccess to Evidence
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Angelucci (In Re Blue Diamond Coal Co.)

The debtor, Blue Diamond Coal Company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Subsequently, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Board revoked its Certificate of Self Insurance without proper notice or hearing, citing the bankruptcy filing and cessation of claims payments. The debtor then sued the Board and its members, alleging violations of federal bankruptcy law (discrimination and automatic stay), denial of due process under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, and seeking to avoid the revocation as an unauthorized post-petition transfer. The bankruptcy court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss for the claims related to bankruptcy law violations (Counts I, II, and IV), finding sufficient factual allegations. However, the court granted dismissal for the due process claim (Count III), ruling that adequate post-deprivation state remedies were available, which precluded a federal claim under § 1983.

BankruptcyWorkers' CompensationSelf InsuranceMotion to DismissAutomatic StayDiscriminationDue ProcessEleventh AmendmentSovereign ImmunityPost-petition Transfer
References
21
Case No. 2-04-255-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 30, 2005

Anton Antonov and Tanev & Son Trucking v. Sonja Walters and Shawn Brown, in His Capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Delbert and Sonya Walters

The appellants, Anton Antonov and Tanev & Son Trucking, appealed a judgment in favor of Sonja Walters and Shawn Brown. Appellants raised three issues: Sonja Walters' lack of standing due to her bankruptcy, the trial court's denial of Shawn Brown's intervention, and the legal and factual insufficiency of evidence for Sonja's future medical expenses. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding that Sonja had standing because her claims were properly exempted from the bankruptcy estate, Brown's intervention was timely as it related back to Sonja's original suit, and sufficient evidence supported the jury's award for future medical expenses given Sonja's permanent brain injury and ongoing treatment.

BankruptcyStandingInterventionFuture Medical ExpensesSufficiency of EvidencePersonal InjuryMotor Vehicle AccidentExemptionsChapter 7 TrusteeAppellate Review
References
31
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n (In Re Pan American Corp.)

This case involves an appeal by Pan American World Airways (Appellant) from a bankruptcy court decision that affirmed an arbitration award. The award, issued by the Pan Am and ALPA System Board of Adjustment, reinstated Captain Harold Gay, Jr. with back pay and full seniority after his discharge for allegedly allowing a flight attendant to manipulate flight controls. The Appellant sought to vacate the award, arguing the Board exceeded its jurisdiction by not deciding the underlying misconduct and by imposing procedural due process requirements not explicitly in the collective bargaining agreement, and that the award violated public policy regarding airline safety. The District Court, presided over by Judge Kimba M. Wood, affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision, finding the Board acted within its jurisdiction by considering due process under the collective bargaining agreement and that the award did not violate public policy, especially given the NTSB's finding that the alleged misconduct did not occur.

Arbitration AwardCollective Bargaining AgreementRailway Labor ActJudicial ReviewDue ProcessPublic PolicyAirline SafetyEmployee DischargeReinstatementBankruptcy Court Appeal
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Bryant v. Edwards

This worker's compensation case involves an appeal by the defendant from a trial court's judgment awarding the plaintiff benefits for 60% permanent partial disability and medical expenses. The defendant, Jerry Edwards, argued he was not notified of the trial date and that his bankruptcy filing should have voided the claim. The Supreme Court found that the trial court erred in denying a new trial due to a lack of evidence that the defendant or his counsel received notice of the trial date, which constitutes a due process violation. The case was reversed and remanded for a new hearing to ascertain the facts regarding notice. The bankruptcy argument was dismissed, as the bankruptcy court had modified the stay to allow the state court worker's compensation case to proceed to final judgment.

Worker's CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityDue ProcessNotice of TrialMotion for New TrialBankruptcy StayRemandAppellate ReviewLogging InjuryMedical Expenses
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

LTV Steel Co. v. Connors (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)

This case is an appeal of two orders issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The first order granted partial summary judgment to the Mining Companies and LTV Steel Corporation, holding they were not legally obligated to pay retiree health benefits. The second order granted the United Mine Workers of America's cross-motion for summary judgment, determining that the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust was liable to pay these benefits. The Plan & Trust appealed both orders to the District Court, arguing violations of the Retiree Benefits Bankruptcy Protection Act, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, denial of due process, and misinterpretation of its obligations under the Wage Agreement's 'no longer in business' clause. The District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's orders, finding the Act inapplicable, subject matter jurisdiction proper as a core proceeding, sufficient opportunity to litigate, and the Plan & Trust liable due to contractual interpretation and collateral estoppel from prior litigations.

Bankruptcy LawChapter 11 ReorganizationRetiree Health BenefitsCollective Bargaining AgreementUMWAEmployee BenefitsSummary JudgmentSubject Matter JurisdictionCore ProceedingCollateral Estoppel
References
13
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Paragon Process Service, Inc.

Paragon Process Service, Inc. appealed a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which held the company responsible for unemployment insurance contributions for its process servers from 1978 to 1980. Paragon contended that these process servers were independent contractors, not employees, over whom it exercised no control beyond legal requirements. The court, referencing precedents like *Matter of 12 Cornelia St. (Ross)*, determined that the Board lacked a rational basis for classifying the process servers as employees. Consequently, the court reversed the Board's decision. The matter was then remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings consistent with this new finding.

Unemployment insuranceIndependent contractorProcess serversEmployer liabilityEmployee classificationAppellate reviewAdministrative decisionRational basis reviewLabor lawNew York law
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Richardson Dinner Theatre, Inc.

The case concerns the priority classification of employer's FICA taxes, generated by wages earned before bankruptcy but paid after, within bankruptcy proceedings. The United States argued for first priority as 'costs and expenses of administration,' while the trustee and Bankruptcy Judge deemed them fourth priority as 'taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt.' The court also considered a second priority classification as 'wages' based on precedent. Ultimately, the court affirmed the Bankruptcy Judge's decision, holding that employer's FICA taxes are properly assigned fourth priority status under Section 64a(4) of the Bankruptcy Act, distinguishing them from employee's FICA taxes and income withholding taxes.

Bankruptcy lawFICA taxesTax priorityBankruptcy ActEmployer contributionsWage claimsAdministrative costsFederal courtsJudicial reviewStatutory interpretation
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In Re Fairpoint Communications, Inc.

Verizon Communications, Inc. appealed a bankruptcy court's confirmation order that included an injunction preventing Verizon from pursuing non-derivative claims against third parties, which could adversely affect FairPoint's bankruptcy estate. FairPoint, which acquired landline operations from Verizon, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to substantial debt. The reorganization plan featured a 'Verizon Injunction' designed to protect FairPoint's assets from claims where FairPoint might be liable for indemnification or contribution. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction to issue this injunction, holding that such contingent indemnification obligations directly impact the bankruptcy estate. The court also deemed Verizon's alternative argument, concerning the absence of 'unique circumstances,' as equitably moot, citing the substantial consummation of the reorganization plan and Verizon's failure to seek a stay of the confirmation order.

BankruptcyChapter 11 ReorganizationInjunctionsSubject Matter JurisdictionEquitable MootnessThird-Party ClaimsIndemnificationContributionAppellate ReviewDistrict Court Decision
References
18
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 01, 2009

People v. Nunn

This case addresses whether a court's discretion to deem a misdemeanor complaint charging a drug offense as an information, without a field test or laboratory analysis, violates a defendant's due process rights. The court distinguishes People v Kalin and Matter of Jahron S., applying the three-factor test from Mathews v Eldridge. It concludes that the substantial private interest in physical liberty and the risk of erroneous deprivation necessitate a laboratory report or field test in most drug-related cases, imposing minimal burden on the prosecution. Specifically, for defendant Mr. Nunn, the misdemeanor complaint was deemed an information on June 1, 2009, after the certified laboratory analysis was filed.

Due ProcessCriminal ProcedureMisdemeanorControlled SubstanceDrug PossessionMisdemeanor InformationMisdemeanor ComplaintPrima Facie CaseLaboratory AnalysisField Test
References
21
Showing 1-10 of 15,816 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational