CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Gioia v. Cattaraugus County Nursing Home

The case involves an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision regarding a claimant's reduced earnings award. The claimant, a nurse's aide with a permanent partial disability from a back injury, had her weekly compensation rate adjusted by the Board to be based on her actual reduced earnings from her current job, rather than her degree of disability. The employer and its workers' compensation carrier appealed, arguing that the Board should have considered the claimant's capacity to earn more. The court affirmed the Board's decision, reiterating that for claimants demonstrating labor market attachment, wage-earning capacity must be determined exclusively by actual earnings during disability, as evidence of capacity to earn more or less, including medical evidence of disability degree, is prohibited.

reduced earnings awardpermanent partial disabilitywage earning capacitylabor market attachmentactual earningsworkers' compensation lawappeal decisionjudicial reviewindependent medical examinationemployer appeal
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Lyublinsky v. Barnhart

A 73-year-old disabled plaintiff, who has received Social Security Disability (SSD) benefits since 1993, brought this action to review the Commissioner's final determination concerning his benefit rate calculation. The plaintiff argued that his benefit rate was improperly calculated, citing discrepancies in earnings records and claims of discrimination. The case has a lengthy procedural history, including multiple remands from the District Court due to issues like denial of a fair hearing and lack of legal representation. The Court conducted a de novo review of the Social Security Administration's (SSA) benefit calculations, utilizing the Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME) method, and found no mathematical errors. Ultimately, the plaintiff failed to present compelling evidence to disprove the SSA's records, which are considered conclusive after a statutory period. Consequently, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted, the complaint was dismissed, and the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision was affirmed.

Social Security DisabilityBenefit CalculationAIME MethodAdministrative Law JudgePro Se PlaintiffFederal Court ReviewEarnings RecordsBurden of ProofRemandJudgment on the Pleadings
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 22, 2015

Claim of Barrett v. New York City Department of Transportation

The case involves an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision regarding a claimant injured in a 2011 work-related motor vehicle accident. A WCLJ classified the claimant with a permanent partial disability and a 25% loss of wage-earning capacity, ruling that he would be entitled to 250 weeks of benefits if his full wages ceased. The Board affirmed this, leading the employer to appeal, arguing that the claimant's current full wages meant a 100% wage-earning capacity, rendering the 25% loss finding unlawful. The court affirmed the Board’s decision, distinguishing between 'loss of wage-earning capacity' (fixed, for benefit duration) and 'wage-earning capacity' (fluctuating, for weekly rates).

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityWage-Earning CapacityLoss of Wage-Earning CapacityBenefit DurationAppellate ReviewStatutory InterpretationMotor Vehicle AccidentNew York Workers' Compensation BoardDisability Classification
References
2
Case No. ADJ2610305 (WCK 63412) ADJ3981181 (WCK 63413) ADJ1135990 (OAK 339001)
Regular
Mar 24, 2009

CATHY D. KRAUS vs. VETERINARY SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a dispute over the correct temporary disability indemnity rate for an applicant injured in 2001. The applicant's original agreed rate was $420 per week based on $630 average weekly earnings, but a subsequent injury in 2006 led to payments at $480 per week. The WCJ awarded an indemnity rate of "at least $480 per week" for the 2001 injury, citing post-injury earnings as evidence of earning capacity. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and remanded for further proceedings. The Board emphasized that post-injury earnings should only be considered if scheduled or reasonably anticipated at the time of the 2001 injury, per *Kyllonen*, and noted insufficient analysis in the WCJ's decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardTemporary Disability IndemnityAverage Weekly EarningsIndustrial InjuryShouldersLabor Code § 4656(c)StipulationsAgreed Medical Evaluator
References
6
Case No. ADJ4258585 (OXN 0130492) ADJ220258 (OXN 0130487)
Regular
Apr 17, 2018

ENRIQUE HERRERA vs. MAPLE LEAF FOODS, U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALEA NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

This notice informs parties that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) intends to admit its rating instructions and a disability rater's recommended permanent disability rating into evidence. The WCAB previously granted reconsideration for further study. Parties have seven days to object to the rating instructions or the recommended rating, with specific procedures for addressing objections. If no timely objection is filed, the matters will be submitted for decision thirty days after service.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPermanent Disability RatingDisability Evaluation UnitRating InstructionsRecommended Permanent Disability RatingJoint RatingReconsiderationObjectionRater Cross-ExaminationRebuttal Evidence
References
0
Case No. ADJ896199
Regular
Apr 30, 2010

CHRISTOPHER SAN JOSE vs. STAGE TECH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns a dispute over the applicant's temporary disability indemnity rate, which was initially based solely on Social Security earnings. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the WCJ erred by not considering the applicant's actual post-injury earnings in a modified position. The Board cited case law establishing that post-injury earnings can be considered to fairly determine an injured worker's earning capacity. Consequently, the applicant's weekly earnings were determined to be $450, resulting in a higher temporary disability indemnity rate.

ReconsiderationTemporary Disability Indemnity RateEarning CapacitySocial Security RecordsModified DutyOffer of ProofAbandoned His JobPre-injury EarningsPost-injury EarningsEarning Capacity Determination
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Scharch v. Keough

The case concerns an appeal from a decision awarding reduced earnings to a claimant, a chef, who was injured in 1961. The court examined two issues: the application of subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law for projecting earnings, and the basis for a $20 weekly reduced earnings rate. The board's application of the 200-multiple factor for projected earnings was affirmed, as it was found the claimant had not voluntarily restricted employment despite prior self-employment attempts. Additionally, the $20 reduced earnings rate, based on medical testimony of a permanent partial disability from a pre-existing arthritic condition combined with the injury, was sustained. The court emphasized the board's responsibility to articulate the factual basis for its reduced earnings findings clearly.

Reduced earningsPermanent partial disabilityWorkmen's Compensation LawAverage daily wageSeasonal employmentPre-existing conditionMedical testimonyBoard findingsJudicial reviewPercentage disability
References
4
Case No. ADJ9064752
Regular
May 12, 2016

SANTOS MARTINEZ vs. TROON GOLF, INC., dba MARIN COUNTRY CLUB, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a dispute over temporary disability indemnity rate calculations following an admitted industrial back, lower extremity, and wrist injury. The employer challenged the administrative law judge's (WCJ) finding of an average weekly earning capacity of \$648.00, arguing insufficient evidence of increased earning potential. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, holding that earning capacity is a dynamic assessment considering overall capability, not just actual earnings at the time of injury. The Board cited the applicant's acceptance of a full-time position at a higher wage rate as strong evidence supporting the determined earning capacity.

Earning capacityLabor Code section 4453(c)(4)Average weekly earning capacityTemporary disability indemnityPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardGoytiaMontanaKyllonenGrossmont Hospital
References
3
Case No. ADJ4216095 (BAK 0149327)
Regular
Oct 25, 2010

ALICIA NUNEZ ARREOLA vs. SUNTREAT PACKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns a seasonal worker who sustained an industrial injury to her right shoulder and cervical spine. The defendant sought reconsideration of the permanent disability rate awarded by the WCJ, arguing it was miscalculated for a seasonal employee. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the WCJ erred in calculating the rate by focusing solely on in-season earnings. The Board amended the award, establishing the permanent disability rate based on the applicant's actual annual earnings, which resulted in a lower rate than initially awarded.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardSeasonal workerTemporary disabilityPermanent disabilityStipulationLabor Code section 4453(c)(4)Earning capacityMontana
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 29, 2015

Matter of Rosales v. Eugene J. Felice Landscaping

The case involves an appeal by an employer and its workers’ compensation carrier from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision. The Board affirmed a WCLJ ruling that the claimant, a landscaper injured in 2010, sustained a permanent partial disability and a 90% loss of wage-earning capacity. The WCLJ had considered various vocational factors, including the claimant's age, limited English skills, and low education, to determine a 10% wage-earning capacity and a $300 weekly benefit rate. The employer argued that vocational factors should not be used to determine wage-earning capacity for computing the compensation rate in permanent partial disability cases. However, the appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, distinguishing permanent from temporary disabilities and concluding that vocational factors are appropriately considered under Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (5-a) when fixing wage-earning capacity in permanent partial disability cases without actual earnings, especially when the injury contributed to the loss.

permanent partial disabilitywage-earning capacityvocational factorsWorkers' Compensation Law § 15benefit durationcompensation ratephysical impairmentback surgerylimited English skillseducational background
References
10
Showing 1-10 of 2,267 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational