CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams

Cathie Williams sued her employer, Waffle House, Inc., for sexual harassment under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) and negligent supervision/retention after enduring offensive comments and physical contact from a coworker, Eddie Davis. Despite Williams' complaints to management, the harassment continued, leading to her constructive discharge. A jury found in favor of Williams on both claims, awarding significant damages for the common-law claim. However, the Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' judgment, ruling that the TCHRA's specific and tailored anti-harassment remedy is preemptive when negligence is entwined with harassment. The Court held that Williams' common-law claim was based on the same conduct as her TCHRA claim and that allowing it would undermine the Legislature's comprehensive statutory scheme. The case was remanded to the court of appeals to address the statutory sexual harassment issues.

Sexual HarassmentNegligent SupervisionNegligent RetentionPreemptionTCHRATexas Supreme CourtHostile Work EnvironmentConstructive DischargeJury VerdictCommon Law Tort
References
40
Case No. Docket No. 49
Regular Panel Decision

Thompson v. Davidson Transit Organization

Dujuan Thompson, a former bus driver for Davidson Transit Organization (DTO), filed a lawsuit alleging harassment and retaliation after attempting to form a new union, as well as race-based harassment. DTO, an organization created to provide employees for the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA), moved for summary judgment, arguing it was not a state actor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court analyzed whether DTO qualified as a state actor based on the "nexus" or "entwinement" test, considering the close relationship between DTO and MTA, including shared facilities, funding, and overlapping leadership. The court found a disputed issue of fact regarding DTO's status as a state actor due to its sole purpose to support MTA and the dual roles of its board members and supervisors as MTA department heads. The court also denied DTO's estoppel arguments, concluding that Thompson's prior NLRB actions and an arbitration decision did not preclude his current claims. Therefore, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was denied.

Civil RightsSection 1983Summary JudgmentState Actor DoctrineNexus TestEntwinementEmployment DiscriminationRetaliationFreedom of SpeechFreedom of Association
References
36
Showing 1-2 of 2 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational