CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ 7941996
Regular
Apr 26, 2016

ROBERTO ALVAREZ vs. LINK STAFFING, INC., ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a disputed lien dismissal where the lien claimant's representative allegedly falsified hearing minutes to obtain the rescission of a dismissal order. The Appeals Board dismissed the employer's petition for reconsideration because the rescission order was not a final decision. However, the Board granted removal due to serious allegations of misconduct, remanding the case to the WCJ for an evidentiary hearing on whether the representative appeared, tampered with records, or made false statements. The WCJ is also tasked with making findings and recommendations on potential sanctions under Labor Code section 5813.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationLien DismissalPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalMinutes of HearingFraudMisconductSanctionsLabor Code Section 5813
References
Case No. ADJ16783938; ADJ16778187
Regular
Aug 28, 2025

Polly Mark Dizon vs. Spears Manufacturing Company, Zurich San Francisco

Applicant Polly Mark Dizon filed applications for cumulative and specific injuries. The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) issued a Findings and Order (F&O) requiring additional Qualified Medical Examination (QME) panels, which the defendant opposed. Defendant filed a Petition for Removal, arguing they would suffer substantial prejudice. The Appeals Board granted the Petition for Removal, finding that due process was violated as no evidentiary record was made, and the Minutes of Hearing were unclear. Consequently, the May 24, 2024 F&O was rescinded, and the matter returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the Board's opinion.

Petition for RemovalQualified Medical Examinationsubstantial prejudiceMinutes of HearingOrdered Off CalendarFindings and OrderHearing LossHeadachesNeurologyAudiology
References
Case No. ADJ2765298 (RIV 0026091)
Regular
Aug 13, 2010

PETE SORIA vs. FLEETWOOD ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation

The WCAB granted reconsideration and rescinded a WCJ's order awarding costs to lien claimants. The WCJ's original order lacked a proper evidentiary hearing, a summary of evidence, and an opinion explaining the grounds for the decision, violating due process and Board rules. The Board found the WCJ's subsequent attempt to rescind the order was untimely. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including an evidentiary hearing and a properly documented decision.

ADJ2765298RIV 0026091ReconsiderationLien ConferenceWCJ OrderStipulated AwardPermanent Total DisabilityRemovalRescinding OrderEvidentiary Hearing
References
Case No. LAO 0799368, LAO 0800603
Regular
Apr 28, 2008

ALICE B. PARKINSON vs. THE OLIVE GARDEN, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior order allowing a lien in full. The WCAB found that the administrative law judge (WCJ) failed to comply with procedural rules by not conducting an evidentiary hearing and that the defendant likely never received proper notice of the lien trial. Therefore, the case was returned to the trial level for an evidentiary hearing on the lien claim, with the WCAB also noting the defendant's potential culpability for non-appearance.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationLien TrialCompromise and ReleaseAffidavit of Defendant Re: Resolution of LiensDue ProcessEvidentiary HearingWCAB Rule 10562Notice of TrialService of Process
References
Case No. ADJ3213659
Regular
Mar 08, 2018

HORTENCIA BRAVO vs. MATRIX PERSONNEL, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a stipulation settling a lien claim. The defendant argued the stipulation should be set aside due to evidence suggesting the lien claimant was dissolved and the tax identification number belonged to a different entity, Pinnacle Lien Services. However, the WCAB found the petition premature as no evidentiary hearing was held to determine "good cause" for setting aside the stipulation. The case was returned to the WCJ to treat the petition as one to set aside and hold a hearing allowing all parties to present evidence.

Petition for ReconsiderationStipulation and OrderLien ClaimantWCJLabor Code Section 4903.8Tax Identification NumberDissolutionAssignmentDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedGood Cause
References
Case No. VNO 537574
Regular
Aug 18, 2008

## CARMEN BAPRAWSKI, vs. ## LOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,

This case involves applicant Carmen Baprawski's claim for workers' compensation benefits due to stress and harassment sustained during her employment as a counselor. The administrative law judge dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to object to a Notice of Intention to Dismiss. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the dismissal order. The Board emphasized the legal policy favoring hearings on the merits and returned the case to the trial level. The WCJ is directed to treat the reconsideration petition as a timely objection and hold an evidentiary hearing on dismissal, considering factors like the applicant's capacity to sit for deposition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationOrder of DismissalApplication for Adjudication of ClaimCumulative InjuryStress and HarassmentNotice of Intention to DismissGood CauseHearing on the MeritsEvidentiary Hearing
References
Case No. ADJ11951225
Regular
Apr 01, 2020

ROBERT HAASE vs. RUFFONI HOME APPLIANCE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted applicant's Petition for Removal because the WCJ's decision lacked a proper record. The WCJ failed to hold an evidentiary hearing or receive evidence on the issue of additional QME panels. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the case for further proceedings at the trial level. This ensures a complete record for meaningful review, as mandated by statute and precedent.

Petition for RemovalWCJWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Codeevidentiary hearingQME panelsrescinded decisiontrial levelminutes of hearingsummary of evidence
References
Case No. ADJ9802798
Regular
Sep 14, 2016

Jorge Gonzalez vs. Wire Tech, Inc., Everest National Insurance Co.

Applicant sought to vacate a Compromise and Release (C&R) agreement, alleging he changed his mind about settling his psychological claims before obtaining a psychological evaluation. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant may have been denied due process by not having his Petition to Vacate fully heard. The case is returned to the trial level for an evidentiary hearing on the applicant's Petition to Vacate the C&R, with all other proceedings stayed pending resolution.

Petition to VacateOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseDuressUndue InfluencePetition for ReconsiderationPsychological EvaluationVerified PetitionGood CauseEvidentiary HearingDue Process
References
Case No. ADJ8368816
Regular
Feb 25, 2015

DOUGLAS PINK vs. CAMPORA PROPANE SERVICE, CRUM & FOSTER INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied applicant Douglas Pink's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board found that Pink failed to demonstrate such harm, nor did he prove that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Additional deficiencies in the petition included lack of evidence for a requested evidentiary hearing and the applicant's attorney's apparent failure to adequately notify the applicant of a medical examination.

Petition for RemovalExtraordinary RemedySubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmReconsiderationAdequate RemedyWCJ ReportMinutes of HearingEvidentiary HearingQualified Medical Examiner
References
Showing 1-10 of 2,111 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational