CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ2765298 (RIV 0026091)
Regular
Aug 13, 2010

PETE SORIA vs. FLEETWOOD ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation

The WCAB granted reconsideration and rescinded a WCJ's order awarding costs to lien claimants. The WCJ's original order lacked a proper evidentiary hearing, a summary of evidence, and an opinion explaining the grounds for the decision, violating due process and Board rules. The Board found the WCJ's subsequent attempt to rescind the order was untimely. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including an evidentiary hearing and a properly documented decision.

ADJ2765298RIV 0026091ReconsiderationLien ConferenceWCJ OrderStipulated AwardPermanent Total DisabilityRemovalRescinding OrderEvidentiary Hearing
References
1
Case No. ADJ7220050; ADJ7503790
Regular
Mar 24, 2023

JENNIE LEE vs. UNITED HEALTHCARE, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the original decision failed to comply with Labor Code section 5313. The decision lacked specific reasoning and citations to the evidentiary record, making it impossible to ascertain the basis for the WCJ's finding of timely payment. The Board rescinded the decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision that properly articulates its findings. This will allow the parties to again seek reconsideration if aggrieved by the new decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardLabor Code section 5313Labor Code section 4650(d)statutory increaseuntimely paymentWCJ Opinion on Decisionsubstantial evidenceevidentiary record
References
7
Case No. ADJ11563618, ADJ11563620, ADJ11563654
Regular
May 02, 2019

MARIA LUQUE VIDALES vs. FOSTER FARMS, FOSTER FARMS LIVINGSTON

The WCAB granted applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order for a replacement QME panel. The original order was issued without an admitted evidentiary record, violating the requirement for decisions to be based on substantial evidence. The case is returned to the trial level to establish a proper record and adjudicate the disputed QME issue. This decision ensures due process by requiring an evidentiary basis before significant procedural orders are made.

Petition for RemovalReplacement QME PanelUntimely Supplemental ReportDiscovery DelayIrreparable HarmSubstantial EvidenceEvidentiary RecordRescind OrderReturn to Trial LevelFoster Farms
References
6
Case No. LBO 0303975
Regular
Jun 20, 2008

SUSETTE BILLINGER vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This case involves an appeal of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision regarding an applicant's disability benefits. Both the applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of the initial findings, arguing the administrative law judge erred in several respects. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and returned the matter for a new decision due to the original decision's lack of evidentiary support.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLos Angeles Unified School DistrictSedgwick Claims Management ServicesReconsiderationFindings and AwardPermanent DisabilityTemporary DisabilityAverage Weekly WageMedical ReportsUnion Contract
References
3
Case No. ADJ2582500 (SAL 077867)
Regular
Jul 26, 2010

TONY BLANDINO vs. UNITED WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/AIG (CHARTIS), LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (LIBERTY MUTUAL)

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the arbitrator's prior decision. The arbitrator erred by preventing Liberty Insurance Company from presenting new evidence regarding its liability and by deeming himself bound by a previous WCJ's decision. The matter is returned to the arbitrator for an independent evidentiary hearing and a de novo decision, as supplemental contribution proceedings allow non-elected defendants to fully litigate their liability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationArbitratorFindings Award and OrdersProrata ShareContribution ProceedingsLabor Code § 5500.5Cumulative InjuryAOE/COESupplemental Proceedings
References
3
Case No. ADJ1631280
Regular
Sep 02, 2025

FAREED ROSHANDELL vs. TRANSFORM SR HOLDING MANAGEMENT LLC/TRANSFORMCO, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Applicant Fareed Roshandell, who previously sustained injuries, sought reconsideration of a June 3, 2025 decision by a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ). The WCJ had taken the matter off calendar and made findings without an evidentiary record, including deeming a medical report invalid and noting service irregularities. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration but granted the petition to treat it as a petition for removal. Citing due process violations and the lack of an evidentiary record, the Board rescinded the WCJ's June 3, 2025 decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with their opinion.

RemovalPetition for ReconsiderationUtilization ReviewRequest for AuthorizationMedical-Legal ReportSanctionsHome Health AidePhysician's AssistantDue ProcessEvidentiary Hearing
References
16
Case No. ADJ1016521 (MON 0350650)
Regular
Aug 16, 2012

DEBRA KENNEDY vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior award due to procedural and evidentiary issues. Key findings were that the WCJ's decision lacked proper documentation of evidence and the permanent disability rating calculation was unclear. Additionally, the medical reporting for psychological injury and apportionment lacked thorough analysis required by statute. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision, considering a 104-week limit on temporary disability and credit for EDD payments.

Agreed Medical EvaluatorSubstantial EvidenceIndustrial InjuryLumbar SpineCervical SpineRight WristLeft WristHypertensionGERDIBS
References
2
Case No. LAO 0838241
Regular
Jun 26, 2008

LETICIA MUNOZ vs. CISCO BROTHERS, INC., ARCH INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the Supplemental Findings and Award because the WCJ's decision was not supported by substantial evidence in the record. The WCJ improperly relied on medical reports not admitted into evidence and potentially based her decision on inadmissible evidence. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, a new decision, and to correct evidentiary errors.

Petition for ReconsiderationSupplemental Findings and AwardTemporary disabilityPermanent disabilityMedical treatmentPetition to TerminateExpedited HearingDeclaration of ReadinessAdmitted evidenceSubstantial evidence
References
4
Case No. LAO 0803576
Regular
Jun 02, 2008

CESAR GARCIA LOPEZ vs. ROYAL PRINTEX INC., KYUN HYUN RYU, EUL KYEONG KIM, UEBTF

This case involves lien claimants challenging a WCJ's decision disallowing their claims for medical treatment provided to the applicant for a low back injury. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the WCJ's decision lacked clarity regarding which specific lien claims were denied and the precise basis for those denials. The matter is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings to clarify the lien claimants, the evidentiary record, and the reasons for any future decision.

WCABReconsiderationLien ClaimantsSupplemental Findings and OrderReasonable and Necessary TreatmentIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityReport and RecommendationEvidentiary RecordLabor Code § 5313
References
0
Case No. VNO 472954, VNO 472955
Regular
Jul 23, 2007

LUIS PAZ vs. WARNER BROS.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior decision that denied vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance. The WCAB found the prior decision lacked a proper evidentiary record as required by WCAB rules, specifically regarding the admission and listing of documents like the applicant's February 9, 2004 letter. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to establish a complete record before a new decision is made.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardVocational Rehabilitation Maintenance AllowanceDelay RateIndustrial InjuryBilateral Upper ExtremitiesCumulative InjuryPetition for ReconsiderationRehabilitation UnitExpedited HearingMinutes of Hearing
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 23,110 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational