CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ9607136
Regular
Mar 13, 2023

NORMA PEREZ vs. CUSTOM PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) decision. The WCJ found the applicant to be 100% permanently and totally disabled based on credible testimony and substantial medical and vocational evidence. The defendant's arguments regarding non-industrial apportionment and the vocational evaluator's reporting without an interpreter were rejected. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and decision, denying the defendant's request for reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationReport and RecommendationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDenying PetitionAdministrative Law JudgeCumulative TraumaNon-industrial Medical ApportionmentNon-industrial Vocational ApportionmentInterpreterVocational Evaluator
References
Case No. ADJ3565194 (BAK 0139614)
Regular
Dec 04, 2015

TAMMY AGOSTA vs. VONS, A SAFEWAY COMPANY

The applicant sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation award of $61\%$ permanent disability for an industrial injury. She argued that the administrative law judge erred and that she should be found permanently totally disabled ($100\%$) based on vocational expert and medical evaluations. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied her petition, adopting the WCJ's report. However, one commissioner dissented, arguing that the applicant's significant medical restrictions and vocational expert's opinion supported a finding of $100\%$ permanent disability.

AgostaVonsSafewayWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Orders and Awardadministrative law judgecumulative injuryright shoulderright upper extremity
References
Case No. ADJ8668832
Regular

BACILIO ANGEL SALAZAR vs. SAN DIEGO PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA for CASTLEPOINT NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding a prior order that deemed a QME report timely. The Board found Dr. Tahami's psychiatric evaluation report was untimely served on the defendant. As the defendant objected prior to receiving the report, they are entitled to a replacement QME panel in psychiatry.

Petition for RemovalQualified Medical EvaluatorQME paneluntimely reportreplacement QMEAdministrative Director RuleLabor Codepsychiatric injurymedical-legal evaluationsubstantial prejudice
References
Case No. FRE 0065599
Regular
Mar 04, 2008

JOHN ALLEN vs. KENT MAGNELL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied John Allen's petition for reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision to terminate his vocational rehabilitation services due to a consistent failure to cooperate. The Board found that Allen's persistent insistence on a specific, unachievable vocational goal, coupled with his refusal to undergo necessary medical evaluations and provide requested records, led to the impasse. Consequently, his request for retroactive benefits and vocational rehabilitation was denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardVocational RehabilitationPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderRehabilitation UnitSuitable Gainful EmploymentVocational Rehabilitation Maintenance AllowanceAverage Weekly EarningsTemporary Disability IndemnityCompromise and Release
References
Case No. ADJ6535347, ADJ6534384
Regular
Nov 02, 2015

CHRISTINE KNAPP vs. COUNTY OF FRESNO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The applicant sought to overturn findings of $53\%$ permanent disability and disputed the exclusion of vocational expert reports and a claim of $100\%$ disability. The Board found the petition contained numerous factual misrepresentations and violations of WCAB rules and professional conduct by the applicant's attorney. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended denial due to the petition's legal defects and factual inaccuracies.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardOccupational Group NumberIndustrial InjuryRight ShoulderMigraine HeadachesPermanent DisabilityAgreed Medical ExaminerQualified Medical Examiner
References
Case No. ADJ7523911
Regular
Jun 21, 2018

JEAN BUDD vs. A.C. TRANSIT, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

The applicant sought removal of an order that took the case off-calendar to allow the defendant to obtain a vocational evaluation, arguing it caused prejudice and delay. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board agreed with the WCJ that the defendant was not obligated to obtain a rebuttal vocational report until the applicant presented evidence that might rebut the Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. The applicant's delay arguments were deemed insufficient to warrant removal.

Petition for RemovalOff-Calendar OrderVocational EvaluationSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmDeclaration of ReadinessObjectionRebuttal Vocational EvaluationWCAB RulesPermanent Disability Rating Schedule
References
Case No. ADJ1966312 (AHM 0071600)
Regular
Jul 02, 2009

CHERYL BOND-DICKEY vs. LAW OFFICE OF SATIN & RUSSELL, SCIF INSURED SANTA ANA

This case involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a finding of 100% permanent disability for a paralegal/file clerk who sustained an industrial injury. The defendant argued the vocational expert's evaluation was insufficient. However, the Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant failed to request further vocational evaluation at trial or provide rebuttal evidence. The Board also noted the defendant's petition lacked the specific detail and record references required by regulation.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardFindings Award and Orderspermanent disabilityvocational expertopen labor marketpetition for reconsiderationagreed vocational evaluatorsubstantial medical evidenceReport and Recommendationindustrial injury
References
Case No. ADJ9845740
Regular
Dec 18, 2019

RICHARD OKUNIEWICZ vs. CHRISTOFFERSON TRANSPORTATION, QBE-PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns an employer's petition for removal challenging a judge's order denying a motion to compel an in-person vocational evaluation. The Appeals Board denied the petition, treating it as a reconsideration request because the underlying order resolved threshold issues. Although the decision was final regarding threshold matters, the Board reviewed the discovery dispute under the extraordinary removal standard. The majority found no significant prejudice or irreparable harm from denying the in-person evaluation, as a remote evaluation was deemed sufficient.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalFindings and OrderMedical-Legal EvaluationCompelSignificant PrejudiceIrreparable HarmThreshold IssueInterlocutory IssueVocational Evaluation
References
Showing 1-10 of 8,367 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

ยฉ 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational