CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Robin G.

The OCFS filed a permanency hearing petition for Robin G., a juvenile delinquent, seeking a finding of reasonable efforts for her safe return home and approval of a permanency plan. Robin, placed with Graham-Windham, exhibited declining behavior, academic struggles, and mental health issues, leading to psychiatric hospitalization. Her mother's inconsistent willingness and temporary unavailability complicated reunification efforts. The court granted OCFS's petition to extend Robin's placement but denied the finding of reasonable efforts by OCFS and Graham-Windham, citing unmet educational and psychological needs, lack of parental engagement, and inadequate planning for transition, while approving the broader permanency plan.

Juvenile DelinquencyPermanency HearingFoster CareChild WelfareFamily Court ActOffice of Children and Family ServicesGraham-WindhamExtension of PlacementReasonable EffortsEducational Needs
References
29
Case No. ADJ7131007
Regular
Oct 18, 2010

PHILLIP SCHWARTZ (DEC'D.) vs. HALLIDAY MANAGEMENT, GAB ROBINS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Petition for Removal in the case of Phillip Schwartz (deceased) v. Halliday Management and GAB Robins. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) as the basis for its decision. The order denying removal was filed on October 18, 2010.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeADJ7131007Denying RemovalHalliday ManagementGab RobinsPhillip Schwartz (Dec'd)Order Denying RemovalDenial of Removal
References
0
Case No. ADJ3825592
Regular
Aug 23, 2010

ROGER NOH vs. BURGER KING, GAB ROBINS BURBANK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's order vacating a prior dismissal is not a final order. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board noted that a technical issue with the EAMS system may have prevented the WCJ from seeing the applicant's objection to dismissal. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalOrder Vacating Order of Dismissalfailure to prosecutegood causefinal ordersubstantive rights and liabilitiessignificant prejudiceirreparable harmextraordinary remedy
References
7
Case No. ADJ3277232 (GRO 0018561) ADJ2363528 (GRO 0019047)
Regular
Jun 15, 2009

MYRIAM PEREZ vs. JOSLYN SUNBANK CORPORATION, GAB ROBINS BURBANK

This case involves cross-petitions for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The applicant sought penalties for alleged failure to provide proper pulmonary treatment and an increased attorney fee, while the defendant challenged the penalty awarded for unreasonable delay in reimbursing self-procured medical treatment. The Board denied both petitions, affirming the WCJ's findings that the MPN was not defective and that penalties for reimbursement delay were warranted. A dissenting commissioner argued for a higher attorney fee award, finding the time spent on both issues justified the requested amount.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityFurther Medical TreatmentRespiratory ConditionMedical Provider Network (MPN)Pulmonary Medicine SpecialistSelf-Procured Medical Treatment
References
1
Case No. ADJ1338407; (LBO 340803) ADJ4574334; (LBO 340804) ADJ3948688; (LBO 340805)
Regular
Oct 01, 2008

OSVALDO TRASVINA vs. DUTKO HARWOOD FLOORS, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY, GAB ROBINS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's disallowance of Farwest Diagnostics' $\$ 2,969.00$ lien claim. The Board found the lien was time-barred under Labor Code Section 4903.5 as it was filed significantly after the compromise and release approval and outside the statutory time limits. Furthermore, the lien claimant failed to prove they served their claim notice on the defendant insurer or employer in 2003 as required for tolling or application of Section 4904(a).

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimReconsiderationLabor Code Section 4903.5Time BarredCompromise and ReleaseTollingNotice of ClaimMedical TreatmentMedical-Legal Services
References
3
Case No. ADJ6859108
Regular
Jul 07, 2010

EDISON TABUYO vs. REFRIGERATOR MANUFACTURERS, INC., GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICAN

This case concerns a petition for removal filed by the applicant's attorney, seeking to overturn an order denying their request to be relieved as counsel. The petition was dismissed because it was not served on the applicant, who is considered a necessary party in such proceedings. Failure to serve all parties, as required by WCAB Rule 10850, is grounds for dismissal. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition for removal.

Petition for RemovalPetition to Be RelievedUnserved PetitionWCAB Rule 10850Proof of ServiceDismissed PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeApplicant's AttorneyParty to the Case
References
3
Case No. ADJ3839297 (GOL 0100930)
Regular
Nov 02, 2009

Edith Barrett vs. PACIFIC GRADUATE INSTITUE-HUMAN RESOURCES, GAB ROBINS

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings due to the applicant not being given an opportunity to further develop the record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSupplemental PetitionPetition for ReconsiderationPermanent Disability Rating ScheduleAMA GuidesDue ProcessDevelop the RecordAlmaraz IIBilateral WristsAdministrative Assistant
References
2
Case No. POM 0264727POM 0267166
Regular
Aug 19, 2008

CELIA MUNOZ vs. THE TOWN CLUB, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY/GAB ROBINS

Here's a summary of the provided case excerpts: In *Fiducia*, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration and found applicant sustained industrial injuries but had failed to attend medical exams and hearings, leading to dismissal for good cause. The Board vacated the prior dismissal and remanded for further development of the record, acknowledging that the applicant's failure to attend examinations and hearings warranted dismissal. However, due to lack of current medical evidence, the Board vacated the dismissal and returned the case to the trial level to allow applicant to attend examinations and hearings. In *Munoz*, the defendant sought reconsideration of an order vacating submission and returning the case to the trial calendar to further develop the evidentiary record concerning a lien claimant's charges. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration as it was not from a final order and denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of irreparable harm or significant prejudice. The Board emphasized that interlocutory orders to further develop evidence are not subject to reconsideration.

WCABindustrial injurypsycheTMJnasal traumateethblood pressuredismissalgood causetemporary disability
References
12
Case No. ADJ6891058
Regular
Jul 16, 2015

Robin Hill vs. California Department of Social Services

This order dismisses Robin Hill's Petition for Reconsideration in the workers' compensation case against the California Department of Social Services. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's report. Therefore, the petition is officially dismissed by the Board.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissal OrderWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJ ReportCalifornia Department of Social ServicesYork Risk Services GroupADJ6891058Riverside District OfficeMarguerite Sweeney
References
0
Case No. OXN 0128545 OXN 0132143
Regular
Mar 28, 2008

DONALD GEORGE vs. KAISER AIR CONDITIONING AND SHEET METAL, GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Kaiser Air Conditioning's petition for reconsideration. The Board previously rescinded a dismissal of a lien claim, favoring a hearing on the merits despite the lien claimant's non-appearance and the defense's sympathetic arguments. The Board reiterated that the decision was limited to the specific facts of this case, allowing for separate proceedings against the lien claimant's counsel for their conduct.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardKaiser Air Conditioning and Sheet MetalGAB Robins North AmericaPetition for ReconsiderationDecision after ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienLien ClaimantFailure to AppearGood CauseCompromise and Release
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 67 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational