CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ6889455
Regular
Jun 10, 2011

SALVADOR RUIZ vs. WASTE CONNECTIONS INC., ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a psychiatric injury claim where the employer asserted a good faith personnel action defense. The Board found the employer failed to prove the personnel action was in good faith, noting evidence of racial animus and inconsistent disciplinary practices. Furthermore, even if the action were deemed in good faith, the employer did not meet its burden of proving it was a substantial cause (35-40%) of the applicant's psychiatric injury, as the medical evidence did not apportion causation. Therefore, the defense under Labor Code section 3208.3(h) was not established.

Labor Code section 3208.3(h)psychiatric injurygood faith personnel actionsubstantial causeobjective reasonablenesspretextualagreed medical evaluatorcausation apportionmentmedical evidencediscriminatory
References
6
Case No. ADJ2667325 (LAO 0789144)
Regular
Jul 08, 2014

Brenda Millender vs. Ford Motor Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding Brenda Millender sustained a psychiatric injury due to her employment at Ford Motor Company. Ford argued the WCJ erred in finding actual employment events caused the injury, that medical evidence was insufficient, and that the injury stemmed from lawful personnel actions. The WCAB rescinded the award and returned the case to the trial level. This is because the WCJ did not properly analyze Ford's affirmative defense that the injury was substantially caused by good faith personnel actions, as required by Labor Code section 3208.3(h). The WCJ also failed to consider Ford's documentary evidence supporting its defense and misapplied the causation standard for good faith personnel actions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardBrenda MillenderFord Motor CompanyOpinion and Decision After Reconsiderationindustrial cumulative traumapsyche injurypredominant causeLabor Code section 3208.3good faith personnel actionssubstantial medical evidence
References
1
Case No. ADJ6784503-M; ADJ7336025
Regular
Aug 24, 2012

WILLIAM AGUILAR vs. TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

This case involves William Aguilar's claim for psychiatric injury against Time Warner Cable, stemming from two periods of employment. The Administrative Law Judge found Aguilar sustained industrial psychiatric injuries in both roles and ruled the defendant waived the "good faith personnel action" defense under Labor Code section 3208.3(h). While the majority affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the defense was not raised properly and not proven even if considered, Commissioner Lowe dissented. Commissioner Lowe argued the defense was timely raised and that the employer's reassignment of territories constituted a good faith personnel action, thereby barring compensation.

Labor Code 3208.3(h)Good Faith Personnel ActionPsychiatric InjuryCumulative Industrial InjuryReconsiderationWCJ ReportDissenting OpinionObjective Good Faith StandardSubstantial CausePredominant Cause
References
9
Case No. ADJ8670595, ADJ8670435
Regular
Nov 24, 2015

PATRICIO PEREZ vs. FRONT PORCH

This case involves an applicant seeking workers' compensation for back and psychiatric injuries. The employer contested findings regarding temporary disability, psychiatric injury, and self-procured medical treatment, arguing the WCJ erred by not applying the good faith personnel action defense. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and remanded for further proceedings. Specifically, the Board requires a full analysis of the good faith personnel action defense and clarification on the duration of modified work provided.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings Award and OrderIndustrial InjuryPsychiatric InjuryTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilitySelf-Procured Medical TreatmentMedical Provider Network (MPN)Qualified Medical Examiner (PQME)
References
5
Case No. ADJ7371382
Regular
Jun 02, 2014

EARL SMITH vs. TIME WARNER CABLE; CHARTIS, administered by ACE USA

This case involves a worker claiming psychiatric injury. The defendant seeks to dismiss the claim based on the "good faith personnel action" defense under Labor Code section 3208.3(h). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration because the administrative law judge (WCALJ) failed to address the elements of this defense. The WCAB rescinded the previous findings and returned the case for further proceedings, requiring the WCALJ to specifically address whether the personnel actions were lawful, nondiscriminatory, and in good faith, and if they substantially caused the injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPsychiatric injuryLabor Code section 3208.3(h)Good faith personnel actionPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of FactWCJPanel Qualified Medical ExaminerPredominant causeSubstantial cause
References
3
Case No. ADJ10434987
Regular
Jan 06, 2023

EZRA CENTENO vs. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION, CORVEL CORPORATION

This case involves an applicant claiming psychological injury, neck pain, headaches, and sleep disorder due to events at Harbor Freight Tools. The defendant argues the injury was substantially caused by lawful, non-discriminatory, good faith personnel actions, which would bar compensation under Labor Code section 3208.3(h). The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award, finding the trial judge used too narrow a standard for "good faith personnel actions" and did not adequately analyze them under the required multi-level approach. The case is returned for further proceedings to properly develop the medical record and reassess the personnel action defense.

Psychiatric injuryGood faith personnel actionLabor Code section 3208.3(h)Substantial causePredominant causeTemporomandibular joint disorderAOE/COEWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardFindings and AwardReconsideration
References
6
Case No. ADJ1259913 (LBO 0390101) ADJ4077421 (LBO 0390100)
Regular
Feb 24, 2014

BELINDA WEATHERSBY vs. ABBOT LABORATORIES, FINANCIAL INSURANCE GUARANTY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board vacated a prior award concerning applicant's psychological injury claim. The Board found that the administrative law judge did not fully address the employer's affirmative defenses of a good faith personnel action. Therefore, the case is remanded for the judge to conduct a *Rolda* analysis and re-evaluate the good faith personnel action defense. Issues regarding post-termination claims and temporary disability benefits were addressed, with the post-termination claims being dismissed, but the question of temporary disability benefits requires further development.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjuryPsyche InjurySales AssociateTemporary Disability IndemnityAffirmative DefenseLawful Personnel ActionPost-Termination ClaimLabor Code Section 3208.3(h)Labor Code Section 3600(a)(10)
References
7
Case No. ADJ13303390
Regular
Feb 15, 2023

JULIO PINEDA vs. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's (WCJ) finding of a compensable psychiatric injury. The defendant argued the psychiatric Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) opinion lacked substantial evidence and that a "good faith personnel action" defense applied. The WCAB rescinded the award, finding the WCJ's decision failed to include a detailed analysis of the "good faith personnel action" defense as required by *Rolda v. Pitney Bowes*. The matter is returned to the WCJ to issue a new decision addressing all relevant issues under the preponderance of evidence standard.

Psychiatric injuryGood faith personnel action defenseRolda analysisSubstantial causePredominant causeQualified Medical Examiner (QME)Findings and Award (F&A)RescindReturn to WCJLabor Code section 3208.3
References
2
Case No. ADJ12294911
Regular
Apr 14, 2025

KHADIJAH BROWN vs. REGINALD AJAKWE, MD, RAYMOND TATEVOSSIAN, MD, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY

Applicant Khadijah Brown sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision that she did not sustain a psychiatric injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment (AOE/COE) and that a good faith personnel action defense was established. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that the WCJ erroneously concluded applicant did not sustain injury to her psyche AOE/COE and failed to recognize objective evidence of harassment. The Board rescinded the original findings and substituted new findings, determining that applicant did sustain injury to her psyche AOE/COE and that this injury resulted from actual events of employment. The issue of the defendant's good faith personnel action defense was deferred for further proceedings.

AOE/COEpsychiatric injuryLabor Code Section 3208.3(b)(1)actual events of employmentharassmentgood faith personnel actionVerga v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.racial epithetsuspensiontermination
References
8
Case No. ADJ9700517
Regular
Oct 05, 2018

JEANNE WILLIAMS vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board found the original decision on the good faith personnel action defense was unclear and required further development. Specifically, the WCJ must clarify which events constituted lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions. The parties will then need to re-address whether these specific actions were a substantial cause of the applicant's psychiatric injury with the medical evaluator.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPSYCHE INJURYGOOD FAITH PERSONNEL ACTIONLABOR CODE §3208.3(H)TEMPORARY DISABILITYPANEL QUALIFIED MEDICAL EVALUATOR (PQME)DR. ELATROZYROLDA ANALYSISSUBSTANTIAL CAUSELAWFUL PERSONNEL ACTION
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 10,347 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational