CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1529722
Regular
Apr 23, 2012

ALEXANDRA JAMISON vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, TRAVELERS INSURANCE

This case involves an applicant, Alexandra Jamison, and defendants Wells Fargo Bank and Travelers Insurance. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued an order denying reconsideration of a prior decision. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the reasons presented in the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report for their denial. Therefore, the applicant's petition for reconsideration was unsuccessful.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAlexandra JamisonWells Fargo BankTravelers InsuranceADJ1529722LAO 0830997Order Denying ReconsiderationPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJ
References
Case No. ADJ7518237; ADJ7518238
Regular
Nov 28, 2011

MARCELA ACOSTA vs. FLOYD'S 99 BARBERSHOP, STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, Administered by ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE COMPANY, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Administered by ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal in this case and issued a notice of intent to sanction attorney Daniel V. Anaya $500.00 for unspecified reasons. No objection was filed by Anaya, and the $500.00 sanction was subsequently paid. The WCAB confirms the sanction and acknowledges the payment has been transmitted to the General Fund.

RemovalSanctionsWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDaniel V. AnayaFloyd's 99 BarbershopStar Insurance CompanyTower Select Insurance CompanyIllinois Midwest Insurance CompanyGeneral FundBradford & Barthel
References
Case No. ADJ3638574
Regular
May 12, 2011

FRANK GARCIA vs. U.S. PIPE AND FOUNDRY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Defendant's petition for disqualification and removal. The WCAB found that the petition was not properly verified and lacked the required supporting affidavit detailing grounds for disqualification. Therefore, the Defendant's procedural failures led to the dismissal of their requests.

WCABPetition for DisqualificationPetition for RemovalLabor Code section 5311WCAB Rule 10452WCAB Rule 10843WCJbiasdiscoveryunverified petition
References
Case No. ADJ6683258
Regular
Jun 08, 2010

HILLMAN BARRERA vs. JAMM INDUSTRIESI CORPORATION, ILLINOIS MIDWEST SPRINGFIELD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) considered a Petition for Removal filed by the applicant. The WCAB reviewed the petition and the report of the administrative law judge. Based on their review, the WCAB adopted the judge's report and denied the Petition for Removal. The order officially denies the applicant's request for removal, affirming the administrative law judge's decision.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardJAMM INDUSTRIESI CORPORATIONILLINOIS MIDWEST SPRINGFIELDADJ6683258Administrative Law Judgedeny removalDeidra E. LoweFrank M. BrassJames C. Cuneo
References
Case No. MISSING
Regular
May 07, 2012

VLORDELIZA SERRANO GAMBOA vs. GRANCELL LEBOVITZ ET AL

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior WCJ decision. The Board rescinded the previous decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This action is not a final determination on the merits of the case. Parties retain their right to seek reconsideration of the WCJ's subsequent decision.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeWCJReconsideration GrantedDecision RescindedFurther ProceedingsTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation CaseMedical-Legal
References
Case No. SFO 0440404, SFO 0488633
Regular
Jan 09, 2008

XIAO MIN LAM vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT HOTEL, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the WCJ's decision, amending it to include findings of fact regarding attorney's fees and temporary disability indemnity. Specifically, the applicant's attorney was awarded $1,200 for penalty petition services, and the applicant received additional temporary disability and penalties totaling $109.44 and $27.36 respectively. The Board deferred ruling on other issues including rehabilitation, attorney's fees under LC 4607, and a hospital lien.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationTemporary Total DisabilityLabor Code §5814Penalty AwardSelf-Produced Medical ExpenseAttorney's FeesLabor Code §5814.5Rehabilitation UnitLien Claim
References
Case No. ADJ8721311
Regular
Mar 25, 2014

JOSE ANDRES GAYTON HERNANDEZ vs. AL PAK LABOR, OLD REPUBLIC, Administered by CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant is Jose Andres Gayton Hernandez, and the defendants are AL PAK LABOR and Old Republic. A Petition for Removal was filed and subsequently withdrawn by the petitioner. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petition. No further action will be taken on this matter.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalDismissedPetitionerApplicantDefendantAdministeredCannon Cochran Management ServicesOld RepublicAl Pak Labor
References
Case No. ADJ8915327
Regular
Apr 22, 2015

MARIA HERNANDEZ vs. WAREHOUSE DEMO SERVICES, INC., ESIS

This case involves a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Warehouse Demo Services, Inc. and ESIS regarding an award of total temporary disability (TTD) to applicant Maria Hernandez. The defendants argued the award was unsupported by evidence regarding Hernandez's ability to drive or perform modified duty while experiencing dizziness. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning. The WCAB also admonished defense counsel for improperly citing and attaching an unadmitted deposition. The WCJ found applicant's testimony credible, supported by medical reports indicating dizziness and inability to drive or work safely.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportADJ8915327deniedPaul E. ZayatGrancell Standerdeposition10842Lynn Devine
References
Case No. ADJ1381123 (VNO 0509657)
Regular
May 23, 2014

JERRY DILEVA vs. NORTHRUP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered by AIG CLAIMS, INC.

In this workers' compensation case, the defendant, Northrup Grumman Systems Corp., petitioned for reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted this petition for reconsideration. This action allows the WCAB further opportunity to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues presented. The WCAB intends to issue a just and reasoned decision after their complete review and any necessary further proceedings.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONGRANTEDSTATUTORY TIME CONSTRAINTSFACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUESJUST AND REASONED DECISIONFURTHER PROCEEDINGSOFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONERSSAN FRANCISCOELECTRONIC ADJUDICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
References
Showing 1-9 of 9 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational