CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Shelton v. City of Greeneville

The plaintiff initiated a suit against the city of Greeneville under the Workmen's Compensation Act to recover for injuries, specifically the loss of an eye, sustained during a street extension project. Although generally employed and paid by the Tennessee Emergency Relief Administration (TERA), the plaintiff argued that he was a loaned servant to the city at the time of the accident, making the city liable as his special employer. The trial judge dismissed the suit, prompting the plaintiff's appeal to this Court. The Court, however, found that TERA exercised proprietary control over the project, fixing work hours and bearing the majority of the cost, despite the city providing a foreman and a small financial contribution. Consequently, the Court affirmed the lower court's decision, concluding that the city of Greeneville was not the plaintiff's employer, either generally or specially, and thus bore no liability under the compensation statute for the plaintiff's injuries.

Workmen's CompensationLoaned Servant DoctrineEmployer-Employee RelationshipEmergency Relief AdministrationGovernmental LiabilityAccident InjuryLoss of EyeStreet Construction ProjectControl TestTERA
References
13
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Seay v. Town of Greeneville

Gordon Seay, an employee with limited education, suffered a significant back, hip, leg, and shoulder injury on March 25, 1977, while working for the Town of Greeneville when a 2,000-pound roller overturned. This incident led to his inability to perform heavy manual labor, a skill he had consistently utilized despite prior injuries, causing him to leave his job in October 1977. Medical evaluations by Dr. Sam Huddleston, an orthopedic surgeon, indicated a 50% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, while Dr. Harold Roberts also deemed Seay 100% disabled from manual labor. The employer appealed the chancellor's award of benefits, arguing against the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability causally related to the employment injury. However, the court found sufficient material medical and lay evidence to affirm the chancellor's decree, establishing a causal link between the 1977 injury and Seay's subsequent disability.

Permanent Partial DisabilityHeavy Manual LaborEmployment InjuryCausal RelationshipOrthopedic EvaluationChiropractic TreatmentDisability BenefitsEmployer AppealCourt AffirmationMedical Evidence
References
3
Case No. 2018-02-0063
Regular Panel Decision
May 17, 2018

Hall, Phillip v. Life C~re Center of Greeneville

Phillip Hall filed a Request for Expedited Hearing seeking additional medical benefits for an alleged December 2017 work-related mental injury suffered as a CNA at Life Care Center of Greeneville. He claimed racial and gender discrimination and harassment caused him nausea, shaking, anxiety, and depression. The Court made an on-the-record determination after reviewing the file. The authorized panel physician from IndustriCare noted the injury's work-relatedness as 'indeterminate' and did not find it primarily work-related. The Court concluded that Mr. Hall was not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits as the medical evidence did not support his claim, particularly regarding the requirement for a sudden or unusual stimulus for mental injury. Therefore, the Court denied the requested relief for additional medical benefits.

References
0
Case No. 2018-02-0048
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 27, 2018

Morrison, Leonard v. Walmart

Leonard Morrison, a Walmart loader, sustained a back injury on September 2, 2017, leading to light-duty restrictions from Greeneville Urgent Care and Dr. Nicholas Grimaldi. Despite Walmart offering alternative duty, Morrison alleged violations of his restrictions and insufficient work hours, while supervisors claimed he unilaterally violated restrictions and took unexcused absences. Morrison's request for a leave of absence due to pain was denied by Walmart, citing a lack of medical proof, resulting in his termination for not calling in during the pending leave period. He sought temporary disability benefits, arguing Walmart's non-compliance and his pain-induced inability to work full-time. The Court ultimately denied Morrison's request, finding insufficient evidence to prove entitlement to either temporary total disability, due to the absence of expert medical opinion, or temporary partial disability, as his self-limited hours and failure to adhere to company policy justified his termination.

Temporary Disability BenefitsBack InjuryWork RestrictionsUnexcused AbsencesTerminationMedical OpinionCausal ConnectionWorkplace RulesExpedited HearingWorkers' Compensation Claims
References
3
Showing 1-4 of 4 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational