CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ700106 (SAL 0075388) ADJ4293270 (SAL 0067937) ADJ3847224 (SAL 0067938) ADJ1646200 (SAL 0011386)
Regular
Sep 01, 2015

WILLIE PEARSON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Chamberlain's Children Center, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

In this workers' compensation case, CIGA sought to be relieved of liability for applicant's medical treatment, arguing that the State of California Department of Corrections ("the State") constituted "other insurance." The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the State does not qualify as "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)(A). Unlike private self-insured employers, the State is not required to obtain workers' compensation insurance or a certificate of self-insurance, and thus does not fall within the statutory definition of an "insurer." The Board further clarified that the State Compensation Insurance Fund's role in claim adjustment services for the State does not make it "other insurance" when the State is not otherwise insured with SCIF.

CIGASupernational Insurance Companylegally uninsuredother insurancecovered claimsInsurance Code Section 1063.1State of California Department of Correctionsreimbursementstipulated awardjoint and several liability
References
Case No. ADJ4415679 (OAK 0259031) ADJ2701101 (WCK0050594)
Regular
May 10, 2010

Stanley Sanders vs. REMEDY INTELLIGENT STAFFING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC. dba NAPA PIPE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a judge's decision, ruling that Napa Pipe, a self-insured special employer, is liable for applicant Stanley Sanders' workers' compensation benefits. Despite an agreement between the general employer (Remedy Temp) and Napa Pipe attempting to limit liability to Remedy Temp's insurer (Reliance), Napa Pipe's joint and several liability as a special employer cannot be contractually eliminated. Because Napa Pipe's self-insurance was not excluded for special employees and constitutes "other insurance" under Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), CIGA is relieved of its obligation to provide benefits following Reliance's insolvency. Therefore, Napa Pipe must now provide all workers' compensation benefits and administer the claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardStanley SandersRemedy Intelligent StaffingCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationReliance National Insurance CompanyOregon Steel MillsNapa PipeADJ4415679ADJ2701101Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration
References
Case No. GRO 0023124
Regular
Dec 31, 2007

CAROLINA CAMACHO vs. TEAMWORK, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, DEN-MAT, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

Zenith Insurance sought reconsideration of a WCAB decision that found CIGA not liable because other insurance was available, ordering Zenith to reimburse CIGA for benefits paid. Zenith argued the WCAB lacked jurisdiction, claiming the contribution issue was subject to mandatory arbitration under Labor Code § 5275. The WCAB denied reconsideration, ruling that § 5275 did not apply as this was a general/special employment situation, not a cumulative trauma case, and Zenith's insurance constituted "other insurance" relieving CIGA of liability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGAZenith Insurance CompanyContributionMandatory ArbitrationLabor Code Section 5275Labor Code Section 5500.5General EmploymentSpecial Employment
References
Case No. GOL 86641, GOL 99800
Regular
Aug 07, 2008

MIGUEL TORRES vs. HENDRY TELEPHONE PRODUCTS, CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY/ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE INSURANCE, HR3 STAFFING SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to correct errors in the original award, specifically the misidentification of employers and their insurers. The WCAB rescinded the prior award and returned the case for further proceedings to determine the existence of a cumulative injury and clarify employer liability. The Board also noted that Connecticut Indemnity's policy likely constitutes "other insurance," thus precluding CIGA's involvement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoint Findings and AwardReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryNeckRight Upper ExtremityCarpal Tunnel SyndromeCubital Tunnel SyndromeHeadachesDizziness
References
Case No. ADJ4684775 (VEN 0117727) ADJ4381820 (VEN 0117723)
Regular
Dec 19, 2011

JOANNE LUTZ, JOANN LUTZ vs. RUSSELL WARNER dba ROTO ROOTER SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, and for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, LINDA McDONALD, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior ruling, allowing CIGA to pursue reimbursement from State Farm for benefits paid due to applicant's industrial injuries. The Board found that unlike a request to alter a prior award, CIGA's petition sought to enforce its statutory right to reimbursement from "available" insurance under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9). Since State Farm, as a jointly and severally liable insurer, appears to be such "available" insurance, the case is remanded for further proceedings on CIGA's reimbursement claim.

California Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGAPaula Insurance CompanyFremont Insurance CompanyState Farm Insurance Companystipulated awardreconsiderationreimbursementcontributionother insurance
References
Case No. ADJ3816448 (LAO 0789900) ADJ335314 (LAO 0818843) ADJ1177078 (LAO 0789901)
Regular
Sep 25, 2015

RAYMUNDO PITONES vs. MEL CAST LITHO, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This case involves CIGA, the California Insurance Guarantee Association, seeking to be absolved of liability for workers' compensation benefits for an injured worker, Raymundo Pitones. CIGA argues that a settlement with another insurer for a subsequent, overlapping injury constitutes "other insurance" that should relieve CIGA of its obligations. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied CIGA's petition, finding that the subsequent settlement did not fully cover all of Pitones' injuries, particularly those that did not overlap. Therefore, CIGA remains liable for the benefits not covered by the prior settlement to ensure the applicant can recover his full benefits.

CIGACalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationMel Cast LithoInc.California Compensation Insurance CompanyliquidationSEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICESPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings of Fact and Orderworkers' compensation administrative law judge
References
Case No. ADJ1888124 (SAL 0111884) ADJ3322590 (SAL 0079903)
Regular
Oct 20, 2016

MARIA NUNEZ vs. MANN PACKING COMPANY, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation; STATE OF CALIFORNIA

This case concerns the California Insurance Guarantee Association's (CIGA) liability for an applicant's workers' compensation claims after Fremont Compensation Insurance Company became insolvent. CIGA argued it should be relieved of liability because the State of California, as the applicant's employer through IHSS, constituted "other insurance" under Insurance Code Section 1063.1. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, holding that the State of California does not qualify as "other insurance" under the relevant statutes. This distinction is based on the State not being required to obtain workers' compensation insurance or a certificate of self-insurance like private or other public employers.

CIGAFremont Compensation Insurance Companyliquidationlegally uninsuredother insuranceInsurance Code Section 1063.1covered claimsIn-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)statutory limitationsself-insurance
References
Case No. MON 0278744
Regular
Nov 26, 2007

JULIANA LAMBETH vs. RN NETWORK, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR PHICO INSURANCE, KAISER PERMANENTE

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant sustained an injury in 1999 while employed by both RN Network (general employer) and Kaiser Permanente (special employer). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Kaiser's petition for reconsideration, affirming the dismissal of CIGA and holding Kaiser solely liable. The Board found that Kaiser's self-insured status constituted "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9), thereby precluding CIGA's liability, regardless of contractual agreements between the employers attempting to shift liability.

SPECIAL EMPLOYERGENERAL EMPLOYERCIGAOTHER INSURANCESELF-INSURED STATUSWORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGEJOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITYCONTRACTUAL EXCLUSIONINDUSTRIAL INJURYLIQUIDATED INSURER
References
Case No. ANA 0324555
Regular
Aug 19, 2007

CONNIE CERVANTES vs. TEMPEST SERVICES INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, ITT CANON

This case concerns whether a self-insured special employer's coverage constitutes "other insurance" that would relieve the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) of liability for an injured worker's benefits. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's finding that ITT, a permissibly self-insured special employer, was liable for benefits. The Board relied on precedent establishing that self-insurance by an employer is considered "other insurance" under relevant statutes, thus excluding CIGA's coverage.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardGeneral employerSpecial employerPermissibly self-insuredCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGALiquidationCovered claimsOther insuranceInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)
References
Showing 1-10 of 10,525 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational