CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Polan v. STATE INS. DEPT.

Charlene Polan, suffering from a chronic psychiatric disability, challenged her insurer's 24-month limitation on long-term disability benefits for mental disorders, while physical disabilities were covered until age 65. She argued this violated Insurance Law § 4224 (b) (2), which prohibits insurers from limiting coverage solely due to disability without actuarial justification. After the New York State Insurance Department rejected her complaint, Polan initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Both the Supreme Court and Appellate Division denied her petition, concluding that § 4224 (b) (2) does not mandate equal benefits for mental and physical disabilities. The Court of Appeals affirmed, interpreting the statute to prohibit discrimination against an individual based on their disability, not to require parity of benefits across different types of disabilities for all insureds.

DiscriminationDisability InsuranceMental DisabilityPhysical DisabilityInsurance LawStatutory InterpretationAntidiscrimination StatutesEmployee BenefitsLong-term DisabilityActuarial Principles
References
13
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Harrigan v. Friend

The Supreme Court's order, which denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment, was unanimously affirmed on appeal. The defendants sought to dismiss the complaint based on the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, specifically sections 11 and 29 [6]. However, the defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was a special employee of defendant Video-seal Corp. at the time of the accident. This failure meant that the exclusive remedy provisions could not be applied. The appellate court thus upheld the lower court's decision, affirming the order with costs.

Exclusive RemedySpecial EmploymentSummary Judgment MotionAppellate ReviewWorkers' Compensation Law § 11Workers' Compensation Law § 29(6)Video-seal Corp.Niagara County CourtAffirmed OrderEmployer Liability
References
2
Showing 1-2 of 2 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational