CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ469779 (RIV 0067408)
Regular
Apr 13, 2009

REGINALD LESLIE, JR. vs. SUN BOSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the original award to include injury to the applicant's low back and bilateral wrists, correcting a clerical error based on prior stipulations. The Board affirmed the original temporary disability award, finding the applicant's medical evidence for continuing disability lacked substantial evidence. New evidence from Dr. Kessler was deemed insufficient to warrant a change in the original decision. Therefore, the original award was affirmed with the corrected finding of injury to the low back and wrists.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryBilateral ShouldersNeckHeadClosed Head InjuryJaw and TeethLumbar Spine
References
Case No. ADJ617754 (VNO 0442409)
Regular
Feb 17, 2012

SHABANA QADRI vs. SELECT PERSONNEL, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CMS

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error in the original Findings and Award. This error had stated that the applicant sustained injury to her back and neck, then immediately stated she did not. The Board clarified that the applicant did not sustain injury to her neck or back. The Board affirmed the original decision, upholding the finding that the applicant did not sustain industrial neurologic injury to her head, citing a lack of credible and contemporaneous medical evidence supporting her claim.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardQualified Medical ExaminerClerical ErrorCredibility DeterminationIndustrial InjuryBilateral KneesHead InjuryNeck Injury
References
Case No. MON 0316510
Regular
Jul 18, 2008

MIGUEL LOPEZ vs. MV TRANSPORTATION, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, BROADSPIRE CLAIM SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an amended award finding applicant incurred industrial injury causing 78% permanent disability. The Board found the applicant's neurologist's report regarding post-traumatic head syndrome lacked substantial evidence due to contradictions with applicant's testimony. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level to further address permanent disability and apportionment issues.

WCABMV TransportationAmerican Home AssuranceBroadsire Claim ServicesMIGUEL LOPEZBus DriverIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjuryRight Shoulder Injury
References
Case No. ADJ10160405
Regular
Dec 17, 2019

JEFFREY JENSEN vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This decision addresses Jeffrey Jensen's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Transportation. The Appeals Board affirmed the prior findings and award with a minor amendment. The amendment clarifies that the applicant stipulated to sustaining injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment to his head, neck, low back, shoulders, and knees. This amendment ensures consistency with the stipulated facts and awarded benefits.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationStipulationAOE/COEAmended Findings and AwardSupervising Environmental PlannerCalifornia Department of TransportationLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundHead Injury
References
Case No. ADJ14951750 (MF); ADJ15106978
Regular
Jul 07, 2025

JORGE ARMANDO GARAY SANCHEZ vs. BLAKE MCCLURE

Applicant Jorge Armando Garay Sanchez sought reconsideration of a Finding of Fact and Order (F&O) issued by a WCJ, which concluded he failed to prove industrial injuries on two separate dates. The Appeals Board granted the petition, finding that the defendant, Blake McClure, had admitted applicant's employment and failed to rebut the employment presumption. The Board rescinded the original F&O and substituted a new one, affirming that applicant claimed industrial injuries to his left knee, ankle, and foot on July 15, 2021, and to his head and neck on February 3, 2020, further noting the defendant was uninsured. The case has been returned to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

Petition for ReconsiderationFinding of Fact and OrderWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJIndustrial InjuryLeft KneeLeft AnkleLeft FootHead and NeckUninsured Employer
References
Case No. VNO 452114, VNO 452108
Regular
Aug 17, 2007

AURELIA SANCHEZ vs. PARACELSUS HEALTH CORP.

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, finding that the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding the applicant's neck injury was not substantial evidence. This was due to the AME's failure to review relevant medical records and consider the applicant's subsequent neck surgery. The case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record, including potentially obtaining a supplemental opinion from the AME or appointing a new medical examiner.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardAurelia SanchezParacelsus Health Corp.industrial injurybilateral handswristsneck injuryorthopedic agreed medical examinerAMEDr. Jeffrey A. Berman
References
Case No. ADJ7117814
Regular
Feb 11, 2011

JOSE JESUS PANTOJA vs. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, BROADSPIRE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior finding that applicant sustained industrial injury. The defendant argued the claim was barred by Labor Code sections 3600(a)(10) and 3208.3(e) as it was filed post-termination without sufficient evidence of notice or existing medical records prior to termination. The Board found the parties failed to properly frame issues and present evidence, particularly regarding the applicant's claimed date of injury and the defendant's post-termination defense. Therefore, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSecuritas Security ServicesBroadspireindustrial injurybackneckheadshoulderspsychesleep
References
Case No. ADJ3090848
Regular
Jan 27, 2010

BOB CROUSE vs. ALADDIN'S ELECTRIC COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's award, which found applicant 100% permanently disabled following an industrial injury. Defendant argued against the 100% disability finding, citing insufficient medical evidence and procedural errors. While affirming the 100% disability finding as supported by substantial evidence, the Board amended the award to explicitly state applicant failed to prove industrial injury to his heart or for diabetes. The Board also clarified that a prior petition for reconsideration by the defendant was already addressed and granted in 2007.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awardshop supervisorindustrial injuryleft shoulderleft clavicleright elbowright handheadneck
References
Case No. ADJ350092 (LBO 0372531)
Regular
Apr 23, 2010

PATRICK FOOTE vs. MEDADENT BIOMEDICAL; SCIF INSURED SANTA ANA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Patrick Foote's petition for reconsideration because it was unverified and lacked proof of service, violating Labor Code sections 5902 and 5905. The Board noted that the applicant had ample opportunity to cure these defects but failed to do so. Even if the procedural defects were overlooked, the Board would have denied the petition based on the original administrative law judge's findings. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed for non-compliance with procedural requirements.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalIndustrial InjuryPsycheUpper BackNeckHeadIn Pro PerUnverified Petition
References
Showing 1-10 of 749 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational