CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mason v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

Charlie Mason, a 53-year-old truck driver, died of a heart attack while working a night shift in freezing weather. His widow filed a worker's compensation claim, asserting the heart attack was an occupational disease or an accidental injury resulting from his strenuous work conditions and long hours. The jury determined Mason had a heart attack but found it did not occur in the course of his employment. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's 'take nothing' judgment, finding no error in the jury instructions regarding the definition of 'occupational disease' or the refusal to include a specific definition of 'accidental injury'.

Worker's CompensationHeart AttackOccupational DiseaseCourse of EmploymentJury InstructionsAccidental InjuryAppellate ReviewCausationTexas LawTruck Driver
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dickie

This worker's compensation case concerns James Rhabb Dickie, an appellee, who suffered a heart attack while working as a carpenter. He sued for total and permanent disability benefits and medical expenses, claiming the heart attack was work-related. The appellant, Western Casualty and Surety Co., appealed the trial court's judgment, arguing insufficient evidence of 'strain, overexertion, or shock' and a defective jury charge. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding adequate evidence that Dickie's physically taxing work and the work environment causally contributed to his heart attack, and that the jury instruction on causation was proper.

Worker's CompensationHeart AttackOccupational InjuryDisability BenefitsMedical ExpensesCausationStrainOverexertionJury VerdictAppellate Review
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Clark v. Nashville MacHine Elevator Co.

The employee, Eddie W. Clark, Jr., suffered a fatal heart attack while driving home from work in his employer's vehicle. His widow and son were awarded death benefits by the trial court. The employer, Nashville Machine Elevator Co., Inc., appealed, arguing the heart attack was not causally related to employment activities and that no physical exertion occurred at the moment of the heart attack. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that physical exertion or strain is not required at the instant of a heart attack if there is evidence linking employment activities to it. Medical testimony indicated that the physical demands of the job 'could have' or 'might have' caused the heart attack, which was deemed sufficient for causation.

References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Courtney

Venita Courtney was awarded death benefits as the widow of Bennie R. Courtney after a jury found he suffered a fatal heart attack during employment. The Appellant challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that no specific strain or exertion caused the heart attack while on the job. Medical experts offered conflicting testimonies regarding whether lifting a tool box lid precipitated the heart attack, with one doctor supporting the link and another denying it. The court affirmed the judgment, upholding the jury's finding that the heart attack occurred in the course of employment, citing precedents where minor exertions coupled with pre-existing conditions were deemed sufficient.

Heart AttackCourse of EmploymentSufficiency of EvidenceMedical TestimonyPre-existing ConditionJury VerdictAppellate ReviewCausationOccupational InjuryDeath Benefits
References
12
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Wells

Homer Baxter Wells obtained a judgment against Aetna Life Insurance Company for medical expenses related to a heart attack, based on a jury finding that the heart attack was not an accidental injury. This meant it was not covered by worker's compensation. However, Wells had previously settled a worker's compensation claim with Highlands Insurance Company, asserting the heart attack *was* an accidental injury, leading to a double recovery for the same medical expenses. Aetna argued that Wells was estopped or barred from asserting the heart attack was not an accidental injury due to his prior successful claim. The Supreme Court of Texas found that Aetna's arguments regarding judicial admissions or judicial estoppel were not sufficiently established and were not properly urged in the lower court. Consequently, the writ of error sought by Aetna was refused, with no reversible error.

Double RecoveryJudicial EstoppelWorker's Compensation ClaimMedical ExpensesWrit of ErrorTexas Civil ProcedureInconsistent Legal PositionsHeart Attack InjuryInsurance Dispute
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cooley v. New York State Police

In January 1985, a State Trooper experienced a heart attack, leading him to file a workers' compensation claim asserting work stress and wood-cutting for fitness as causes. The State Insurance Fund controverted the claim, arguing the heart attack was due to wood-cutting for a personal second job. Initially, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge found occupational disease and awarded benefits, but the Workers' Compensation Board later rescinded this decision, determining that the claimant was not under undue work stress and his heart attack stemmed from personal activity. This appeal affirmed the Board's disallowance, citing substantial evidence that the personal wood-cutting precipitated the heart attack, rather than work-related stress. The court found medical evidence of job-related causation speculative and upheld the Board's resolution of conflicting medical opinions.

Heart AttackOccupational DiseaseJob StressPersonal ActivityCausal RelationshipMedical OpinionSubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewWorkers' Compensation BoardClaim Disallowance
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Peggy C. Allison

This case involves an appeal by New Hampshire Insurance Company against a jury's finding that William Allison's fatal heart attack was a compensable injury under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. William Allison, an operator at Sterling Chemical, suffered a heart attack after attending a mandatory fire training school. The core dispute revolved around whether the heart attack was caused by the natural progression of a pre-existing heart condition or by a specific event during his employment. The appellate court addressed the admissibility of the causation expert's testimony and the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence presented. Ultimately, the court affirmed the trial court's judgment, upholding the jury's determination.

Workers' CompensationHeart AttackCompensable InjuryCausation Expert TestimonyLegal SufficiencyFactual SufficiencyTexas Labor CodeMedical EvidencePlaque RupturePhysical Exertion
References
24
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Flowers v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision to grant worker's compensation benefits to employee Mr. Flowers for permanent total disability resulting from a heart attack. The heart attack was found to have arisen out of and in the course of his employment with South Central Bell, despite a pre-existing heart condition. The court reiterated that employers take employees as they find them and that a causal connection between employment activities and a heart attack is a question of fact. Additionally, the court affirmed the commutation of the award to a lump sum, finding that Mr. Flowers demonstrated a special need to purchase a condominium due to his health, which was deemed to be in his best interest. The court also found the appeal was not frivolous.

Workers' CompensationHeart AttackPermanent Total DisabilityCausal ConnectionArteriosclerotic Heart DiseasePre-existing ConditionLump Sum AwardCommutation of BenefitsEmployee BenefitsEmployment-related Injury
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Helton v. Food Lion, Inc.

The plaintiff, a produce supervisor for Food Lion, Inc., suffered a heart attack four days after an abrasive confrontation with his new supervisor, Mr. Anderson. The trial court denied worker's compensation benefits, finding that the heart attack did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Medical testimony indicated job stress was a contributing factor, but also noted the plaintiff's pre-existing severe arteriosclerotic heart disease and other risk factors. The Supreme Court of Tennessee affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding that the stress, occurring four days prior to the heart attack, was of a general nature and not the "acute, sudden, or unexpected emotional stress directly attributable to employment" required for a compensable accident.

Worker's CompensationHeart AttackEmotional StressCausationPre-existing ConditionScope of EmploymentMedical EvidenceJob-related StressDenial of BenefitsTennessee Supreme Court
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Stone v. City of McMinnville

Charles Stone, a McMinnville police officer, suffered a heart attack and sought workers' compensation benefits, relying on a statutory presumption that heart disease for law enforcement officers is an employment-related injury. The City of McMinnville challenged this, presenting medical evidence from three physicians who attributed Stone's heart attack to lifestyle factors such as high cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking, rather than job stress. While Stone initially established a prima facie case with the statutory presumption, the court found that the competent medical evidence successfully rebutted this presumption. Consequently, Stone failed to prove a direct causal link between his employment and his heart attack, as no specific physical or emotional event precipitated the condition. Therefore, the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel's decision, which reversed the trial court's award of benefits and dismissed the suit, was affirmed.

Workers' CompensationHeart AttackPolice OfficerCausationStatutory PresumptionRebuttalMedical EvidenceLifestyle FactorsEmployment-related InjuryTennessee Law
References
15
Showing 1-10 of 712 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational