CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 17, 2004

Two Trees Farm, Inc. v. Planning Board of Town of Southampton

This case involves a CPLR article 78 proceeding initiated by petitioners to challenge a determination made by the Planning Board of the Town of Southampton. The Planning Board had conditionally approved the petitioners' application for preliminary subdivision approval after amending their draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), citing concerns about the subdivision's consistency with a voluntary agricultural conservation program. The Supreme Court, Suffolk County, initially granted the petition, annulled the Planning Board's determinations, remitted the matter, and directed the Board to approve the application. However, the appellate court found the Planning Board's decision to amend the DEIS arbitrary and capricious, affirming the annulment of the determinations and the need for further environmental review based on the original DEIS. Crucially, the appellate court modified the judgment by removing the directive for the Planning Board to approve the subdivision, emphasizing that the court should not substitute its judgment for that of the Planning Board on substantive State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) matters.

CPLR Article 78Environmental ReviewSEQRAPlanning BoardSubdivision ApprovalDraft Environmental Impact StatementFinal Environmental Impact StatementArbitrary and CapriciousAbuse of DiscretionAnnulment
References
12
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Wilson v. Selsky

The petitioner, a prison inmate, initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge three separate determinations that found him guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules during his participation in a work release program. The first determination involved taking unapproved cash loans from a co-worker, supported by bank records and parole officer testimony, despite the petitioner's denials. The second determination concerned altering his work schedule without parole officer approval, substantiated by time sheets and employer testimony. The third determination accused him of unauthorized driving, which was supported by witness testimony. The court confirmed all determinations and dismissed the petition, finding them supported by substantial evidence and rejecting the petitioner's claims of procedural errors, prejudice, and bias.

prison disciplinary ruleswork release programunapproved loansaltered work scheduleunauthorized drivingsubstantial evidencehearsay evidencecredibilityprocedural errorsdue process
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Roberts v. Industrial Board of Appeals

The Commissioner of Labor initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul a determination by the Industrial Board of Appeals (IBA) which granted Soft Images, Inc. a permit for industrial homework. The Commissioner had initially denied the permit, arguing a lack of statutory authority to issue individual homework permits and that her determinations were not subject to IBA review. The Special Term dismissed the Commissioner's application. On appeal, the court affirmed the judgment, rejecting the Commissioner's arguments. The court found that the Commissioner has the authority to grant exceptions under the Labor Law and that the IBA is statutorily empowered to review, revoke, or modify the Commissioner's orders.

Industrial Homework PermitLabor Law ComplianceJudicial Review of Administrative DecisionsIndustrial Board of Appeals AuthorityCommissioner of Labor DiscretionStatutory InterpretationAdministrative ProcedureNew York Labor LawPermit Denial AppealSoft Images Inc.
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 04, 1993

Wappingers Central School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

The Wappingers Central School District initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). PERB had ordered the District to negotiate with the Wappingers Federation of Transit, Custodial and Maintenance Workers regarding a daily time sheet rule. The Supreme Court initially favored the District, but the Appellate Division found the Supreme Court's mootness argument flawed. After reviewing the record, the Appellate Division concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support PERB's finding that the School District refused to bargain or intend to negotiate the impact of the time sheets. Consequently, the Appellate Division granted the District's petition and annulled PERB's original determination.

Public Employment Relations BoardCPLR Article 78Administrative LawJudicial ReviewPublic Sector Labor LawCollective BargainingUnilateral ChangeTime SheetsMootness DoctrineSubstantial Evidence
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
May 22, 1992

Fedorczak v. Dolce

This case involves an appeal from a Supreme Court judgment that annulled determinations by the City of White Plains Commissioner of Public Safety regarding firefighter benefits. The petitioners, firefighters injured in the line of duty, were initially denied benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-a, with their time lost allocated to sick leave. The Supreme Court found that prior Workers' Compensation Board awards had already established that the injuries occurred in the performance of their duties, thus entitling them to benefits. The appellate court affirmed this decision, drawing parallels between General Municipal Law § 207-a and § 207-c, and deeming the respondents' initial determinations arbitrary and capricious. Consequently, the judgment directed the City of White Plains to provide the petitioners with the appropriate benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-a.

FirefightersGeneral Municipal Law § 207-aWorkers' Compensation BoardSick LeaveInjury in Line of DutyCPLR Article 78Appellate DivisionWestchester CountyMunicipal EmployeesPublic Safety
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Murphy's Disposal Services, Inc. v. Gardner

The petitioners, Murphy's Disposal Services, Inc. and its owner Michael J. Evereth, initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination that they willfully failed to pay prevailing wages. Their contracts with the Town of Colonie for waste collection did not always include prevailing wage schedules, and they initially relied on a 1996 Department of Labor opinion letter. However, the 2004 contract specified prevailing wages, and a Department investigator informed Evereth in 2006 that the opinion letter was incorrect. Despite this, petitioners continued to underpay their employees. Following an audit and hearing, a willful underpayment of approximately $70,000 was found. The Court confirmed this determination, asserting that knowledge or imputed knowledge of a violation suffices for a finding of willfulness, and dismissed the petitioners' arguments.

Prevailing wagewillful underpaymentLabor LawCPLR article 78waste collectionpublic contractsadministrative reviewemployee compensationDepartment of Laborbuilding service work
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

County of Orange v. Village of Kiryas Joel

The County of Orange challenged environmental determinations by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Kiryas Joel regarding the construction of a public water supply facility and pipeline. The Supreme Court granted the County's petition, annulled the determinations, and remitted the matter for a supplemental environmental impact statement. The appellate court modified the judgment, directing the preparation of an amended final environmental impact statement instead of a supplemental one, specifically requiring analysis of wetlands, sewage, wastewater discharge, a phase 1-B archaeological study, and growth-inducing effects. The court affirmed the Supreme Court's order denying the Village's motion to renew opposition to the petition, concluding that while deficiencies existed in the initial environmental review, the lead agency was not required to consider additional alternatives beyond those already identified. The case clarifies that an amended FEIS is appropriate for initial deficiencies, not an SEIS.

Environmental ReviewSEQRA ComplianceCPLR Article 78Wetlands ImpactWastewater DischargeArchaeological StudyGrowth-Inducing EffectsEnvironmental Impact StatementAmended FEISJudicial Discretion
References
19
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Smith v. New York State & Local Retirement System

Petitioner, a maintenance worker at Carthage Central School District, was injured after a ladder slid off an elevator roof while he was repairing masonry. He applied for disability retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law article 15, which was initially granted by a Hearing Officer but later denied by the Comptroller. The core issue revolves around whether the incident constituted an 'accident' for disability purposes. This CPLR article 78 proceeding was initiated to review the Comptroller's determination. The court found that the slipping of the ladder or plywood was a sudden and unexpected event, constituting an accident as a matter of law. Therefore, the court annulled the Comptroller's determination and remitted the matter for further proceedings.

Disability Retirement BenefitsAccidental InjuryLadder FallElevator ShaftMaintenance WorkerComptroller Decision ReviewCPLR Article 78 ProceedingWorkplace AccidentRetirement and Social Security LawJudicial Review
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Miele v. Town of Clarkstown

A police officer, after an initial back injury in 1998 for which he received General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits, later ceased working again in 2000 due to continued back pain. The Chief of Police of the Town of Clarkstown denied his request for GML § 207-c benefits for this subsequent absence, determining it was unrelated to the original injury based on a doctor's report. The officer initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding, challenging the denial as arbitrary and capricious and seeking to compel the Town to award benefits. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the Chief of Police's determination had a rational basis in the record, thus not arbitrary and capricious.

Workers' CompensationPolice OfficerLine of Duty InjuryBenefits DenialCPLR Article 78Arbitrary and CapriciousRational BasisAppellate ReviewBack InjuryGeneral Municipal Law 207-c
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mair-Headley v. County of Westchester

The petitioner, a correction officer, was terminated from her employment by the Westchester County Department of Corrections after being absent for over one year due to a nonoccupational injury, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 73. She challenged this determination through a CPLR article 78 proceeding, alleging denial of due process and violation of the Human Rights Law. The Supreme Court initially dismissed the due process claim and transferred the remaining issues to this Court. This Court confirmed the determination, finding that the petitioner received adequate pre-termination notice and a post-termination hearing, satisfying due process. Additionally, the Court concluded that the termination did not violate the Human Rights Law, as employers are not obligated to create new light-duty or permanent light-duty positions for accommodation.

Civil Service LawCPLR Article 78Due ProcessHuman Rights LawEmployment TerminationCorrection OfficerDisability AccommodationWestchester CountyAppellate ReviewPublic Employment
References
21
Showing 1-10 of 14,010 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational