CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2019 NY Slip Op 06859
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 26, 2019

Matter of Sariyah L.J. (Antonio J.)

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a Family Court order that denied Antonio J.'s motion to vacate a default order which determined him to be a notice-only father. The court found that Antonio J. failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default, having chosen to attend a meeting with his shelter worker without notifying his attorney or the court. Furthermore, he failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense, as his affidavit did not establish substantial and continuous contact or financial support for the child, Sariyah L.J., in accordance with Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]. The appeal from the underlying August 20, 2018 order was dismissed as nonappealable.

Family LawPaternityDefault JudgmentVacaturParental RightsChild CustodyAppellate ProcedureDue ProcessInfant CaseMotion Practice
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 25, 1982

Claim of Fabrizio v. J. R. J. Concrete Corp.

Claimant, a construction foreman, sustained injuries in 1976 while employed by J. R. J. Concrete Corporation and was subsequently awarded workers' compensation benefits. The employer and its carrier appealed the award amount, contending that the claimant had intentionally limited his income after the injury to continue receiving Social Security benefits. The Workers' Compensation Board concluded that the claimant did not limit his income. The appellate court found substantial evidence to support the board's determination regarding factual questions and credibility, thus affirming the decision.

Workers' CompensationReduced EarningsSocial Security BenefitsAccidental DisabilityCredibilitySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewConstruction ForemanInjury ClaimBoard Determination
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Region v. W. J. Woodward Construction, Inc.

This case concerns an appeal regarding the electrocution death of a construction worker and the application of Labor Law § 240. The decedent, Grover J. Region, an ironworker employed by McBrearity's Metal Building Erectors, was fatally injured on November 18, 1982, when a crane cable he was helping to operate came into contact with high tension electric lines at a construction site in Ulster County. The plaintiff, administratrix of the decedent's estate, filed a lawsuit against property owner William J. Woodward and contractor W. J. Woodward Construction, Inc., among others, alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) due to the failure to provide proper safety measures for crane operation near electrical hazards. The Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against Woodward and Woodward Construction, who subsequently appealed this decision. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that the defendants had violated Labor Law § 240 (1) by failing to implement necessary safety precautions for the crane, which was being used as a hoist, thereby incurring absolute liability for the injuries proximately caused.

ElectrocutionConstruction AccidentCrane OperationLabor Law § 240Absolute LiabilityWorker SafetySummary JudgmentAppellate ReviewContractor LiabilityOwner Liability
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 14, 1981

J. A. R. Management Corp. v. Sweeney

J. A. R. Management Corp. sold an apartment building to J. R. R. Realty Co., allegedly violating a collective bargaining agreement with Local 32B-32J S.E.I.U., AFL-CIO by failing to give notice and ensure the buyer adopted the agreement. The union initiated arbitration against both J. A. R. and J. R. R. and filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against J. R. R. Petitioners J. A. R. and J. R. R. sought to vacate the arbitration notice, arguing NLRB pre-emption. The Supreme Court granted their motion. On appeal, the judgment was modified: the notice to arbitrate was vacated only for J. R. R. Realty Co., while the motion against J. A. R. Management Corp. was denied. Arbitration against J. A. R. is stayed pending the NLRB's resolution of claims against J. R. R., after which arbitration may proceed for any unresolved disputes arising from the collective bargaining agreement.

ArbitrationCollective Bargaining AgreementNLRB Pre-emptionVacate Notice to ArbitrateEmployer-Union DisputeSale of BusinessSuccessor EmployerUnfair Labor PracticesStay of ArbitrationAppellate Review
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Michael Anthony Vincent J.

The Family Court of Bronx County initially dismissed petitions to terminate the parental rights of Lillian T. and Kevin Vincent J. concerning their children, Michael Anthony Vincent J. and Rose Antionette J. This appellate court reversed that decision, finding clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner agency, St. Christopher-Ottilie and the Commissioner of Social Services, made diligent efforts to reunite the family. The respondents were found to have permanently neglected their children by failing to maintain consistent contact and refusing to cooperate with necessary services. Consequently, the appellate court reinstated the petitions, entered findings of neglect, and remanded the matter for a dispositional hearing.

Parental Rights TerminationChild NeglectDiligent EffortsSocial Services LawFamily Court AppealBronx CountyFoster Care PlacementParental Non-cooperationEvidentiary StandardsAppellate Reversal
References
1
Case No. 2007 NY Slip Op 27390
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 04, 2007

Matter of A. J.

The Administration for Children's Services (ACS) filed a petition alleging that four-year-old T.J. sustained multiple injuries, including a second-degree burn, while in the care of her biological parents, Toni N. and Tyrell J. The parents had previously been found to have abused T.J. The court found the parents' explanations for the injuries incredible and inconsistent with medical testimony from Dr. Philip Hyden, an expert in pediatrics and child abuse. The court entered findings of abuse against both parents for T.J. under Family Court Act § 1012 (e) (i) and derivative abuse findings for her siblings, J.W., J.N., A.J., A.N., and T.S., under Family Court Act § 1012 (e) (ii). Furthermore, the court determined that T.J. was "repeatedly abused" as defined by Social Services Law § 384-b (8) (b) due to the prior abuse findings and the unsuccessful efforts to rehabilitate the parents. However, derivative findings of repeated abuse were not made for the siblings.

Child AbuseRepeated AbuseDerivative AbuseFoster CareParental RightsFamily Court ActSocial Services LawPhysical InjuryMedical ExpertChild Protection Unit
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Orneika J. v. Harriet J.

This case concerns an appeal of a Family Court order from Bronx County, entered on August 5, 1983, which terminated the mother's parental rights to her daughter, Orneika J., and awarded custody to Sheltering Arms Children’s Service for adoption. The appellate court found substantial evidence supporting the termination due to the mother's chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia and inability to provide adequate care, including a history of hospitalizations. However, the decision was unanimously reversed because the mother was denied her statutory right to counsel during both the fact-finding and dispositional hearings. Her attorney remained mute due to an inability to communicate with the hospitalized client, and the court failed to investigate the lack of communication or possibilities for the client's presence. The matter was remanded for a new hearing within 30 days to ensure the mother's due process rights are observed.

Parental Rights TerminationRight to CounselMental IllnessAppellate ReviewDue ProcessAdjournment DenialGuardian Ad LitemSchizophreniaChild CustodyFamily Court Act
References
2
Case No. 2021 NY Slip Op 04274
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 08, 2021

Matter of J.D. (S.A.--M.A.)

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed orders of disposition from the Bronx County Family Court, which found a respondent neglected and abused J.D. and derivatively neglected and abused adoptive children M.A. and E.A. The court based its decision on J.D.'s detailed out-of-court statements, corroborated by an older sibling's testimony and explicit photographs. The Family Court's decision to quash a subpoena for J.D.'s testimony due to potential psychological harm was also upheld. The ruling emphasized the respondent's impaired parental judgment demonstrated by long-term sexual abuse, creating a substantial risk to his children.

child abuseneglectFamily CourtAppellate Divisionparental judgmentout-of-court statementscorroborationsubpoenaPTSDderivative neglect
References
6
Case No. 811336/22E
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 19, 2024

J.M. v. Rozanov

The plaintiff, J.M., sued Victor Rozanov for intentional infliction of emotional distress and violations of New York City Administrative Code § 10-180 and Civil Rights Law § 50-b. The claims arose from the defendant's nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and videos of the plaintiff online, which included her face and full name. This malicious conduct, which continued even after a criminal conviction and a prior civil judgment in New Jersey, caused J.M. severe emotional distress, manifesting as panic attacks, depression, and anxiety. Following an inquest where the plaintiff's testimony and a clinical social worker's report were presented, the court found the defendant liable. Consequently, the court awarded J.M. $500,000 for past and future pain and suffering and an additional $2,500,000 in punitive damages.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional DistressNonconsensual Dissemination of Intimate ImagesRevenge PornCivil Rights ViolationsDamages AwardPunitive DamagesDefault JudgmentEmotional DistressMental HealthOnline Harassment
References
41
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 26, 1988

Tania J. v. Esther J.

The Commissioner of Social Services appealed a Family Court decision dismissing child protective proceedings against Esther J., the mother of Tania, who was sexually abused by Esther's live-in boyfriend, Arthur Leon Little. The Family Court found Little abused Tania but acquitted Esther J., claiming insufficient proof of her knowledge or failure to protect. The appellate court reversed, citing evidence from medical examinations and Tania's out-of-court statements to professionals, which demonstrated Esther J. had actual or constructive knowledge of the abuse. The court found Esther J. failed to protect Tania, especially after Tania's gonorrhea diagnosis and physical signs of chronic trauma, establishing a prima facie case of abuse and neglect. The case was remanded for a dispositional hearing.

Child Protective ProceedingsSexual AbuseChild NeglectParental ResponsibilityFamily Court ActAppellate ReviewOut-of-Court StatementsCorroboration of AbusePrima Facie EvidenceGonorrhea Diagnosis
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 1,302 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational