CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9839444; ADJ8274021; ADJ8272270; ADJ8272417
Regular
Jul 20, 2017

TONY NAVARRO (Deceased), JENNIFER NAVARRO (Widow) vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CALPERS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the decision awarding death benefits to the widow of Tony Navarro. The Board gave great weight to the Administrative Law Judge's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to overturn it. They also noted that the opinion of one physician can constitute substantial evidence, even if it conflicts with others. The judge's finding that Mr. Navarro's prescribed medications contributed to his death was deemed persuasive and analogous to established case law.

CALPERSSCIFCorrectional SergeantCardiac arrestGastric bleedHemorrhagic gastritisVentricular fibrillationQualified Medical ExaminationCoroner's opinionSubstantial evidence
References
3
Case No. CA 10-02273
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 07, 2011

MAZURETT, JUAN v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

The plaintiffs, Juan Mazurett and Theresa Mazurett, commenced a Labor Law and common-law negligence action against the Rochester City School District after Juan Mazurett was injured in a fall from a collapsing scaffold at a construction site. The accident occurred while he was attempting to climb the scaffold provided by his employer, the general contractor. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and partially denied the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment. The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's order, concluding that the plaintiffs established a prima facie violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) due to the scaffold's collapse. The court rejected the defendant's argument that the plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident, finding no evidence that the plaintiff refused to use available safety devices.

Personal InjuryScaffold AccidentLabor Law ViolationConstruction Site SafetyProximate CauseSummary Judgment MotionAppellate ReviewWorker SafetyStatutory DutyNew York Law
References
11
Case No. CV-24-0601
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 02, 2025

In the Matter of the Claim of Juan Duta-Zumba

In July 2022, claimant Juan Duta-Zumba filed a workers' compensation claim for injuries sustained in a ladder fall while working for Level 5 Carpentry. The employer and its carrier, Urban Atelier Group, LLC and SiriusPoint America Insurance, controverted the claim, disputing employment. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) credited claimant's testimony, establishing Level 5 Carpentry as the employer and confirming work-related injuries. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed this decision. The carrier appealed, contending the accident was unwitnessed and their due process rights were violated. The Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence supported the Board's findings regarding the accident and injuries, and that the carrier received adequate due process.

Workers' CompensationLadder FallWork-Related InjuryCredibility DeterminationDue ProcessStatutory PresumptionAppellate ReviewEmployment DisputeMedical EvidenceThird Judicial Department
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 03, 2009

Navarro v. City of New York

The injured plaintiff, Dorian Navarro, fell from a ladder while attempting to retrieve a dropped tool inside a public school's basement, alleging injuries due to violations of Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), 241 (6) and common-law negligence. The Supreme Court initially granted summary judgment to the defendants, dismissing most causes of action. However, the appellate court modified this order, reinstating the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims against the City of New York and the Board of Education, finding triable issues of fact regarding their liability concerning a dangerous ladder and a slippery grease condition. The claims against the New York City School Construction Authority and the Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) claims against all defendants were properly dismissed, as the accident was deemed too far removed from construction-related activity. The case was modified to deny summary judgment on certain claims and affirmed in part.

Personal InjuryLadder AccidentPremises LiabilityCommon-Law NegligenceSummary JudgmentAppellate DivisionDangerous ConditionProximate CauseTriable Issues of FactProperty Owner Liability
References
12
Case No. 533094
Regular Panel Decision
May 26, 2022

In the Matter of the Claim of Juan Bidot

Juan A. Bidot, a probation officer, filed an occupational disease claim for workers' compensation benefits, alleging he developed posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression due to prolonged exposure to sex offenders. Initially, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge established the claim. However, the Workers' Compensation Board reversed this decision, disallowing the claim because Bidot failed to demonstrate that his psychological stress was greater than that experienced by similarly situated officers. Bidot appealed the Board's denial of his request for reconsideration and/or full Board review. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding no abuse of discretion as Bidot failed to present newly discovered evidence or a material change in condition.

Occupational DiseasePosttraumatic Stress DisorderPTSDMental HealthWorkers' Compensation ClaimAppellate ReviewJudicial DiscretionReconsideration ApplicationBoard ReviewProbation Officer
References
9
Case No. 532061
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 21, 2022

In the Matter of the Claim of Juan Abad

Claimant Juan Abad, a general employee of Vanety's Service, LLC and special employee of ACME Furniture, sustained injuries from a fall and filed for workers' compensation benefits. Initially, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge found Vanety's 100% liable. The Workers' Compensation Board later modified this decision, establishing a general/special employment relationship and equally apportioning liability between Vanety's and ACME. ACME appealed, contesting the apportionment and alleging a denial of due process. The Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, affirmed the Board's decision, finding the apportionment to be within the Board's discretion and the due process claim to be unsubstantiated by the record.

Workers' Compensation BenefitsGeneral/Special EmploymentLiability ApportionmentStaffing AgencyAppellate DivisionDue ProcessBoard Decision ModificationCarrier AppealInjuryLadder Fall
References
6
Case No. 2020 NY Slip Op 02504
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 30, 2020

Matter of Navarro v. General Motors

Claimant Jose A. Navarro sustained work-related injuries in 1996 and was subsequently diagnosed with temporary partial and total disabilities. The Workers' Compensation Board made various decisions regarding his disability awards, particularly from April 1997 to September 2011, and issues related to his attachment to the labor market and alleged fraud under Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a. The Board modified some WCLJ decisions and remitted parts of the case for further consideration. Claimant appealed the Board's decision, but the Appellate Division, Third Department, dismissed the appeal, holding that the Board's decision was nonfinal and did not involve a threshold legal issue, thus precluding piecemeal review. A dissenting opinion argued that certain aspects of the temporary disability awards were final and reviewable.

Disability AwardsTemporary Partial DisabilityVoluntary Withdrawal from Labor MarketNonfinal DecisionAppeal DismissedMedical Evidence PreclusionJudicial RecusalWorkers' Compensation BoardAppellate DivisionClaimant's Testimony
References
13
Case No. ADJ6488616 ADJ6594232 ADJ6619612
Regular
Apr 20, 2003

Esperanza Navarro vs. MERVYNS, TRAVELLERS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Esperanza Navarro's petition for reconsideration in cases ADJ6488616, ADJ6594232, and ADJ6619612. The Board adopted the findings and reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. This decision upholds the original ruling, denying Navarro's request for further review.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportdeny reconsiderationADJ6488616ADJ6594232ADJ6619612Esperanza NavarroMervynsTravellers
References
0
Case No. ADJ8004147, ADJ8004039
Regular
Jul 25, 2016

NOE GUDINO vs. JUAN NAVARRO dba NAVARRO'S TREE SERVICE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

This case concerns applicant Noe Gudino's petition for reconsideration of two adverse Findings of Fact and Orders denying claims for cumulative and specific work injuries. Although Gudino's claims were initially presumed compensable under Labor Code section 5402, the defendant successfully rebutted this presumption. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding that any alleged evidentiary errors were invited by the applicant, and affording significant weight to the Workers' Compensation Judge's credibility determinations.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardNoe GudinoJuan NavarroUninsured Employers Benefits Trust FundFindings of Fact and OrdersCumulative InjurySpecific InjuryAOE/COELabor Code Section 5402Presumption of Compensability
References
3
Case No. ADJ1128865 (VNO 0244369), ADJ1909887 (VNO 0181430)
Regular
Jan 09, 2012

JOE NAVARRO vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision regarding Joe Navarro's claims against Lockheed Martin. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's report, which found Navarro to be an unreliable historian with significant symptom magnification. Consequently, the Board denied injury claims for heart and high blood pressure, and upheld a 27% permanent disability award for a psyche injury, based on the judge's credibility findings.

ADJ1128865ADJ1909887plastic parts fabricatorplastic parts fabricator supervisorcontinuous traumapsyche injurypermanent disabilitynon-industrial apportionmentcredible historiansymptom magnification
References
5
Showing 1-10 of 323 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational