CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ7756309
Regular
Jan 09, 2012

Miguel Robles vs. Evolution Fresh, Inc., Amtrust North America

In **Robles v. Evolution Fresh, Inc.**, the applicant sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration. This action was taken to allow further study of the factual and legal issues presented in the case. The Board aims to issue a just and reasoned decision after thorough review and potential further proceedings.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Decisionstatutory time constraintsfactual and legal issuesjust and reasoned decisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersRonnie G. CaplaneDejdra E. Lowe
References
Case No. ADJ8172168, ADJ8075196
Regular
Dec 04, 2012

RONALD PROCK vs. COUNTY OF BUTTE, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involves petitions for reconsideration filed by both the applicant and defendants. The Board has granted these petitions to allow further study of the complex factual and legal issues. This action is deemed necessary to ensure a just and reasoned decision after a complete understanding of the record. Further proceedings may be ordered pending the Board's Decision After Reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetitions for ReconsiderationRonald ProckCounty of ButteJoint Powers AuthorityYork Risk Services GroupInc.ADJ8172168ADJ8075196September 17 2012 decision
References
Case No. ADJ3600842
Regular
Sep 21, 2009

THEMAS POULIN vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, the defendant, County of San Diego, petitioned for reconsideration of a prior decision. The Board has granted the petition to allow for a more thorough review of the factual and legal issues presented. This reconsideration is necessary to ensure a complete understanding of the record and to render a just and reasoned decision. Pending further proceedings, all communications are to be directed to the Board's Office of the Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationSan Diego CountyPermissibly Self-InsuredJuly 2 2009 decisionStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionDecision After Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ2789507 (VNO 0455132)
Regular
Jun 15, 2012

JOSE GUADALUPE FLORES vs. HARBOR RAIL TRANSPORTATION, U.S. FIDELITY \u0026 GUARANTY CORPORATION

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, involving applicant Jose Guadalupe Flores against Harbor Rail Transportation and its insurer, is being reconsidered. Both the applicant and defendant petitioned for review of a prior decision. The Board granted reconsideration to allow further study of the factual and legal issues, aiming for a just and reasoned decision. All future communications must be filed in writing with the Board's Office of the Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationFactual IssuesLegal IssuesJust DecisionReasoned DecisionFurther ProceedingsCommissionersSan Francisco
References
Case No. ADJ6833713
Regular
Dec 14, 2012

LUIS ENRIQUEZ (DECEASED) vs. COUTO DAIRY, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration in the case of Luis Enriquez (deceased) vs. Couto Dairy and Zenith Insurance Company. This decision was made after an initial review of the record, due to statutory time constraints. The WCAB requires further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. All future filings in this matter must be submitted directly to the WCAB Commissioners in San Francisco, not to district offices or via e-filing.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Reconsiderationgranting petitiondecisionstatutory time constraintsfactual and legal issuesjust and reasoned decisionfurther proceedingsfiling requirementsElectronic Adjudication Management System
References
Case No. STK 206161
Regular
Mar 14, 2008

PAM ELLIOTT vs. MOSAIC SALES SOLUTIONS, THE HARTFORD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a prior decision. This action was taken to allow for further study of the case's factual and legal issues, ensuring a complete understanding before issuing a just and reasoned decision. Pending the new decision, all communications must be directed to the Board's Reconsideration Unit.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionFurther ProceedingsReconsideration UnitService Made by Mail
References
Case No. ADJ3821535
Regular
Jun 07, 2010

CARLETTE MOOREHEAD CALDWELL vs. SCIF/HR DEPARTMENT, SCIF SCIF EMPLOYEES ALL

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the defendant against a March 18, 2010 decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted this petition. The WCAB deems reconsideration necessary to further study the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Pending a Decision After Reconsideration, all future communications must be directed to the Office of the Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting ReconsiderationStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersService by MailSCIF/HR Department
References
Case No. ADJ322024 (FRE 0248360)
Regular
Dec 29, 2011

KEVIN MILLER vs. CA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO, SEDGWICK CLAIMS

Defendant CA State University Fresno sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the petition to allow further study of the factual and legal issues. This action is deemed necessary to ensure a just and reasoned decision after thorough review. Pending the decision after reconsideration, all communications must be filed with the WCAB's Office of the Commissioners.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCA State University FresnoSedgwick ClaimsDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned DecisionFurther Proceedings
References
Case No. ADJ2104277 (LBO 0294626)
Regular
Jun 14, 2013

JEANETTE COOK vs. THE BOEING COMPANY/MCDONNEL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, CIGA by its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES for FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a March 27, 2013, decision regarding Jeanette Cook's claim against The Boeing Company/McDonnell Douglas Corporation. This action was taken to allow for further review of the case's factual and legal issues, ensuring a just and reasoned decision. Pending a decision after reconsideration, all future communications must be filed in writing with the Board's Commissioners and not electronically.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationStatutory time constraintsFactual and legal issuesJust and reasoned decisionFurther proceedingsOffice of the CommissionersElectronic Adjudication Management SystemDistrict Office
References
Showing 1-10 of 9,740 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational