Updated Daily
Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board suspends the privilege of Javier Jimenez to appear as a party representative for 180 days, with the suspension continuing until he complies with prior sanction orders, following his failure to respond to a Notice of Intention.
The Appeals Board suspended the privilege of Javier Jimenez to appear as a representative for 180 days due to his failure to respond to a Notice of Intention to Suspend, which was based on non-compliance with prior sanction orders.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued a notice of its intention to suspend Javier Jimenez's privilege to appear as a representative for 180 days due to a pattern of misconduct, frivolous tactics, and failure to comply with sanction orders.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued a notice of intention to suspend Javier Jimenez's privilege to appear as a representative for 180 days, citing a pattern of bad-faith tactics, frivolous actions, and repeated failure to comply with sanction orders.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Javier Rodriguez's Petition for Reconsideration. Rodriguez alleged inadequate notice of a lien conference, claiming the hearing was improperly converted from a status conference. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the hearing was automatically deemed a lien conference by regulation, requiring payment of a lien activation fee. The underlying case was previously resolved by a Compromise and Release.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Petition for Removal filed by the applicant, Javier Guzman. The WCAB adopted the report of the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) as the basis for its denial. While acknowledging a factual inaccuracy in the WCJ's report regarding the Agreed Medical Examiner, the WCAB found no grounds to grant removal. Therefore, the petition was formally denied.
This case involves a defendant seeking reconsideration of an award for 8 hours of daily home care services for the applicant, Javier Banuelos, based on an Agreed Medical Examiner's opinion. The defendant argued the award was improper due to a waived issue regarding a Utilization Review denial and improper reliance on the AME's reports. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant waived the UR denial issue by raising it post-trial, and failed to argue against the substantial evidence provided by the AME. Therefore, the original Findings and Award for home care services were upheld.
This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by applicant Javier Lucatero regarding a January 4, 2013 decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has granted this petition, acknowledging the need for further study of the factual and legal issues. This action is intended to ensure a complete understanding of the record and to allow for a just decision. All future communications must be filed in writing with the WCAB Commissioners' office, not with the Santa Ana District Office or through e-filing.
This case concerns the calculation of the average weekly wage for death benefits following the industrial death of Anamaria Vital. The applicant, Javier Vital Sr., contended the WCJ erred by calculating the wage based on a 52-week period instead of the decedent's earnings at the time of death, which included recent pay increases. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and found the decedent's average weekly wage to be $1,912.04. This revised calculation entitles the applicant to the maximum rate for death benefits.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Maribel Jimenez's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Workers' Compensation Judge's finding that she was not credible and suffered no industrial injury. The Judge found Jimenez's testimony regarding two slip-and-fall incidents lacked credibility due to inconsistencies and her failure to report or seek treatment for nearly two years. Furthermore, the Board agreed with the Judge's assessment of Jimenez's credibility, giving it great weight as per *Garza v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.* The Board adopted and incorporated the Judge's report, concluding no further development of the record was warranted.
Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.