CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ7828356
Regular
Dec 27, 2018

ELIZABETH ZAVALA vs. EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CASTLEPOINT NATIONAL, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION

This case involves lien claimant petitions for reconsideration of two WCJ orders. The first petition was dismissed as moot because the challenged Findings and Award was subsequently rescinded. The second petition was also dismissed because the Order Rescinding Findings and Award for Lien Claim is not a final order, and reconsideration is only permitted from final decisions. Therefore, both petitions for reconsideration were dismissed as they were procedurally improper.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardElizabeth ZavalaEmployment SolutionsTristar Risk ManagementCastlepoint NationalCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationADJ7828356Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardOrder Rescinding Findings and Award
References
Case No. ADJ864227 (LBO 350573) ADJ1635667 (LBO 350607)
Regular
Dec 29, 2008

LUIS ECHEVARRIA vs. FALCON WEST, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed the trial judge's award of attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5814.5. The Board reasoned that section 5814.5 requires an award of attorney's fees to be "in addition to" increased compensation under section 5814, which was not sought or awarded here. Furthermore, the Board found that any delay in payment was not unreasonable due to a good-faith dispute over the net settlement amount.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDLUIS ECHEVARRIAFALCON WESTINC.STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDADJ864227ADJ1635667OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATIONDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATIONFindings and Orders
References
Case No. ADJ11369357, ADJ11369329
Regular
May 21, 2025

GLORIA DAVIS vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Gloria Davis, the applicant, sought reconsideration of Findings and Orders issued on February 7, 2025. The original orders found she sustained a lumbar spine injury but denied her Labor Code section 132a claim for discrimination. Davis contended that the F&O was a result of fraud and WCJ bias, specifically regarding her termination from Kaiser Foundation Hospital for alleged HIPAA violations. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition, the defendant's answer, and the WCJ's report. The Board denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's credibility determination and finding no evidence that Davis was discriminated against due to her industrial injuries.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDGLORIA DAVISKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALSEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICESINC.ADJ11369357ADJ11369329Oakland District OfficeOPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONpatient care technician
References
Case No. ADJ6780734
Regular
Sep 08, 2011

Venessa Vielma vs. The Pape Group, Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the WCJ issued an Order Approving Compromise and Release one day after the jurisdictional 15-day period to act on the applicant's petition for reconsideration had expired. This untimely action rendered the WCJ's Order and the prior Findings, Award and Order without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Board rescinded both the Order Approving Compromise and Release and the Findings Award and Order. The matter is returned to the trial level for further review of the settlement by the WCJ.

Writ of MandatePetition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseFindings Award and OrderAdministrative Law JudgeAppeals BoardIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityApportionment
References
Case No. GRO 0027359 GRO 0031626
Regular
May 14, 2008

TERESA FOSTER-KENNEDY vs. SANSUM SANTA BARBARA MEDICAL FOUNDATION, ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, DYNAMIC CLAIM SERVICE

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming only the initial penalty and attorney's fee for the unreasonable delay in authorizing follow-up care with Dr. Billy. However, the Board reversed all other penalties and attorney's fees related to the payment of prior attorney's fees, finding those issues either rescinded, not properly presented, or mooted by settlement agreements. The employer is now liable for the initial penalty and associated attorney's fee regarding Dr. Billy, but not for any subsequent penalties or fees concerning attorney fee disputes.

Labor Code section 5814Labor Code section 5814.5unreasonable delayfollow-up careattorney's feespenalty petitionreconsiderationawardFindings of FactReport and Recommendation
References
Case No. ADJ3699701 (GRO 0033759) ADJ624834 (GRO 0033758)
Regular
Dec 19, 2011

Barbara Edwards vs. CALTRANS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed prematurely. The Board's prior decision rescinded the judge's findings and remanded the case for a new decision, explicitly stating no findings were made at that stage. Defendant mistakenly sought reconsideration of the Board's procedural order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also noted misrepresentations by the defendant regarding its prior opinion.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissing PetitionOpinion and OrderJoint Findings and AwardAmended Joint Findings and AwardPermanent Total DisabilityApportionmentMedical EvidenceLabor Code Section 4662(d)
References
Case No. ADJ7736993, ADJ8633868
Regular
Jul 29, 2016

HUGO IBARRA vs. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of the Joint Findings and Award. The applicant's argument focused on alleged errors in the WCJ's Opinion on Decision regarding advances, not the Findings and Award itself. The Board clarified that reconsideration is only available for final orders determining substantive rights or liabilities. Since the Findings and Award did not address advances or offsets, and no final order on that issue exists, the petition was denied. Any dispute regarding advances must first be litigated at the trial level.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings and AwardPermanent DisabilityDisability IndemnityAttorney's FeesOpinion on DecisionAdvancesOffsetsTrial Level
References
Case No. ADJ1097789 (VNO 0485505) ADJ3324551 (VNO 0549173)
Regular
Sep 12, 2011

EFRAIN CAZARES vs. CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL SERVICE, ACE USA

This case involves applicant Efrain Cazares's petition for reconsideration and removal regarding a WCAB order that rescinded a prior decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. The WCAB dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because the prior order was not final. The WCAB also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no significant prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant. This was based on the conclusion that the medical evidence regarding applicant's alleged psyche injury was insufficient and the issue needed to be revisited.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoint Findings and AwardOrder to Develop the RecordJoint Findings and AwardIndustrial InjuryPsychePermanent DisabilityApportionment
References
Showing 1-10 of 14,901 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational